Players on the sideline (more doog bait)
Comments
-
Utah championship game was awesome. Only people there were the UW and Utah fans that really give a shit. Groups of kids ripping on UW and I was wasted and thought they were Utah fans so I started saying shit back. Hammered ass schlubby chick walks up to me wanting to murder me and yells at me that they were just displaced from N California fires weeks prior and were at the game as a charity thing.
She then goes and tells on me to stadium staff who come over and make me move back back up to my paid for seats, which were 2-3 rows above where I sat in an entirely empty part of the stadium. -
JFC Petersen quit. I have an idea let’s keep that guy around as an advisor.Purple_Pills said:
I love this current phase where we still have Petersen as an advisor and his culture off the football field, with the new staff that is more new school in football philosophy but more old school in on the field culture.MikeDamone said:I'll remember our love for Petersen top 5 coach in the nation home run hire phase until we entered our hate Petersen too skinny, grumpy, no fun terrible scheme phase.
-
Fans remember the last RB win…they don’t remember playing teams close and losing. I didn’t say there was shame in playing Alabama close-ish for a while. But it did expose UW and the Pac 12 as not being ready to be on that stage.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disagree. Not celebrating it. But there isnt any shame in losing to Bama in Atlanta and finishing 4. Its a part of my argument 2016 was an unbelievable success to everyone besides you and BasemanMikeDamone said:
You're celebrating "playing them close" which is moral victory loser schtick which is not cute.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cute shtick but it was a 10 point game when the 4th quarter started. It was a decent effort by everyone besides Browning, John Ross XVIII, and Petersen/Smith playcallingMikeDamone said:
We held Alabama to 17 offensive points!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is an indictment on 17 to 19, which I getBaseman said:
A good coach would have parlayed 2016 into a dynasty. Oregon was shit. SC was loosing their guyz and reloading with Clay Helton. Meanwhile our big QB additions were Tony Fernandez? Rodriquez and Daniel Bridge Gadd. Didn't sign an inside LB for 3 years and the trot out Kyler Manu. NFL DBS. Gaines and Vita. Top 5 national defense year over year and our great linebacker coach can't sign anyone.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasn't me, but your take on 2016 is FSBaseman said:
That was you? good to knowPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Fuck offBaseman said:
I never lived the love Peterman phase. Took a lot of knocks from these boreds for my disdain. 2016 probably the biggest disappointing season I can remember. Lost opportunities abound but we made the playoffs!MikeDamone said:I'll remember our love for Petersen top 5 coach in the nation home run hire phase until we entered our hate Petersen too skinny, grumpy, no fun terrible scheme phase.
Shoutout to the Disneyland Doog who doubled down and had UW under Peterman as a perennial Playoff participant. At least the Doog, unlike Peterman, enjoyed Disneyland.
Biggest disappointment ever. No leveling up. Videos of expensive boats and fancy coffee. Meanwhile the Twin Towers still stood during our last NY6 victory.
I get for young fans like yourself, 2016 is the best you know. Nothing wrong with that but at some point you'll see Peterman for what he was. Burnt out and stubborn. 2016 was fools gold
But 2016 in a vacuum was pretty epic. Yeah losing to SC was a bummer but we were lucky not to lose at Zona
Defense played their fucking ass off every game. Down 2 of our best 3 players and they held Bama to 17 offensive points in Atlanta. Lowest Bammer output in 2 decades. Finished #4
It was a fun year, its okay to admit that
Losers with loser mentality lose.
Yesterday I heard an MSU fan say they "won the second half". Yay!
Race got all the pictures he needs. 7-0 on Bama
Everyone here would have taken that season no questions asked
2016 was fun. You know what was more fun? 2000 with Neu, Tui, winning a rose bowl and popping off.
If it was a game like MSU vs Bama in the playoff Id be more with you Damone.
But UW deserved to be there and finish 4th.
2000 was special. Purdue was not. -
A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have. -
What I’m trying to reconcile is this:GreenRiverGatorz said:A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have.
“DeBoer gets it, he’s fun, breath of fresh air, innovative, amazing coach, a real winner, Grubbs play calling is masterful, Peterson was a stiff no fun hack, DeBoer even looks like a coach..etc.”
“If Penix goes down to injury this week we are screwed and maybe only win 2 or 3 more games”.
If quote number 1 is true, quote number 2 shouldn’t be true. -
Why is this hard to understand? The qb’s inherited on the roster are currently not very good. Penix without DeBoer struggled last year and was not good.MikeDamone said:
What I’m trying to reconcile is this:GreenRiverGatorz said:A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have.
“DeBoer gets it, he’s fun, breath of fresh air, innovative, Grubbs play calling is masterful, Peterson was a stiff no fun hack, DeBoer even looks like a coach..etc.
“If Penix goes down to injury this week we are screwed and maybe only win 2 or 3 more game”
If quote number 1 is true, quote number 2 shouldn’t be true.
Together they seem to have a good thing and as long as it keeps going they are one of a few teams in the conference that can realistically make it to the championship game. -
Dylan Morris is well established as not good. Some might even say terrible. But Huard? Jury's out.AtomicDawg said:
Why is this hard to understand? The qb’s inherited on the roster are currently not very good. Penix without DeBoer struggled last year and was not good.MikeDamone said:
What I’m trying to reconcile is this:GreenRiverGatorz said:A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have.
“DeBoer gets it, he’s fun, breath of fresh air, innovative, Grubbs play calling is masterful, Peterson was a stiff no fun hack, DeBoer even looks like a coach..etc.
“If Penix goes down to injury this week we are screwed and maybe only win 2 or 3 more game”
If quote number 1 is true, quote number 2 shouldn’t be true.
Together they seem to have a good thing and as long as it keeps going they are one of a few teams in the conference that can realistically make it to the championship game.
Penix already looks several levels above what he was at Indiana. Meanwhile Haener isn't the same Heisman candidate he was last year. Seems clear that coaching matters and all indicators point to Deboer knowing how to squeeze performances out of his QBs. Seems a little premature to be laying out the excuses for Deboer should Penix go down. -
If it all hinges on 1 players, there are other issues. If quote #1 is true, it shouldn’t all hinge on 1 player. Why is that so hard to understand? There is a 5 star national recruit at QB. If he’s not been developed into a competent backup, that’s a coaching issue.AtomicDawg said:
Why is this hard to understand? The qb’s inherited on the roster are currently not very good. Penix without DeBoer struggled last year and was not good.MikeDamone said:
What I’m trying to reconcile is this:GreenRiverGatorz said:A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have.
“DeBoer gets it, he’s fun, breath of fresh air, innovative, Grubbs play calling is masterful, Peterson was a stiff no fun hack, DeBoer even looks like a coach..etc.
“If Penix goes down to injury this week we are screwed and maybe only win 2 or 3 more game”
If quote number 1 is true, quote number 2 shouldn’t be true.
Together they seem to have a good thing and as long as it keeps going they are one of a few teams in the conference that can realistically make it to the championship game.
And for all we know he has been developed and if Penix goes down we are fine. This has more to do with what is being said here than what could be the reality. -
If Dabo loses a pre-happy ending Deshaun Watson does he win the NC? Etc. A lot always rides on one player no matter the coach.MikeDamone said:
If it all hinges on 1 players, there are other issues. If quote #1 is true, it shouldn’t all hinge on 1 player. Why is that so hard to understand? There is a 5 star national recruit at QB. If he’s not been developed into a competent backup, that’s a coaching issue.AtomicDawg said:
Why is this hard to understand? The qb’s inherited on the roster are currently not very good. Penix without DeBoer struggled last year and was not good.MikeDamone said:
What I’m trying to reconcile is this:GreenRiverGatorz said:A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have.
“DeBoer gets it, he’s fun, breath of fresh air, innovative, Grubbs play calling is masterful, Peterson was a stiff no fun hack, DeBoer even looks like a coach..etc.
“If Penix goes down to injury this week we are screwed and maybe only win 2 or 3 more game”
If quote number 1 is true, quote number 2 shouldn’t be true.
Together they seem to have a good thing and as long as it keeps going they are one of a few teams in the conference that can realistically make it to the championship game.
And for all we know he has been developed and if Penix goes down we are fine. This has more to do with what is being said here than what could be the reality.
As far as coaching, given the same roster what would Jimmy Lake have done Saturday? He would have lost 35-7.
Deboner and Penix are both really good. -
Every team in the country is going to have a massive letdown if they lose their starting QB. It is known.
-
What 1 player on Oregon will result in 2-4 losses if he gets hurt? Because that's what I'm hearing Penix is worth.Kingdome_Urinals said:
If Dabo loses a pre-happy ending Deshaun Watson does he win the NC? Etc. A lot always rides on one player no matter the coach.MikeDamone said:
If it all hinges on 1 players, there are other issues. If quote #1 is true, it shouldn’t all hinge on 1 player. Why is that so hard to understand? There is a 5 star national recruit at QB. If he’s not been developed into a competent backup, that’s a coaching issue.AtomicDawg said:
Why is this hard to understand? The qb’s inherited on the roster are currently not very good. Penix without DeBoer struggled last year and was not good.MikeDamone said:
What I’m trying to reconcile is this:GreenRiverGatorz said:A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have.
“DeBoer gets it, he’s fun, breath of fresh air, innovative, Grubbs play calling is masterful, Peterson was a stiff no fun hack, DeBoer even looks like a coach..etc.
“If Penix goes down to injury this week we are screwed and maybe only win 2 or 3 more game”
If quote number 1 is true, quote number 2 shouldn’t be true.
Together they seem to have a good thing and as long as it keeps going they are one of a few teams in the conference that can realistically make it to the championship game.
And for all we know he has been developed and if Penix goes down we are fine. This has more to do with what is being said here than what could be the reality.
As far as coaching, given the same roster what would Jimmy Lake have done Saturday? He would have lost 35-7.
Deboner and Penix are both really good.
Certainly not Nix -
Jury is not out. Sam fucking sucks if he is sitting behind Dylan. Let be honest.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Dylan Morris is well established as not good. Some might even say terrible. But Huard? Jury's out.AtomicDawg said:
Why is this hard to understand? The qb’s inherited on the roster are currently not very good. Penix without DeBoer struggled last year and was not good.MikeDamone said:
What I’m trying to reconcile is this:GreenRiverGatorz said:A lot of fuckos expect a coach who can do it all. Deboer is a breath of fresh air because his offense is fun, innovative - the kids are going nuts on the sideline! Contrast that with the irascible and cantankerous Chris Petersen. Some might even say the difference is night and day!
Maybe, but doing it all is hard. For all the fun Deboer is, he's also presiding over hands down the worst secondary we've had since Nick Holt was fired. And that's fine if he can Lincoln Riley his way to 10+ wins. Or maybe Penix gets hurt, as is tradition, and Huard is yet another in a string of failed home grown QBs. Who knows, it's fucking September and we've been let down way worse than this in the past (everyone except for fudgie remembers).
Whatever, right now I'll doog it up and pretend I'm 100% certain that our new, just-pudgy-enough Dutch coach is leagues better than the old stick in the mud we used to have.
“DeBoer gets it, he’s fun, breath of fresh air, innovative, Grubbs play calling is masterful, Peterson was a stiff no fun hack, DeBoer even looks like a coach..etc.
“If Penix goes down to injury this week we are screwed and maybe only win 2 or 3 more game”
If quote number 1 is true, quote number 2 shouldn’t be true.
Together they seem to have a good thing and as long as it keeps going they are one of a few teams in the conference that can realistically make it to the championship game.
Penix already looks several levels above what he was at Indiana. Meanwhile Haener isn't the same Heisman candidate he was last year. Seems clear that coaching matters and all indicators point to Deboer knowing how to squeeze performances out of his QBs. Seems a little premature to be laying out the excuses for Deboer should Penix go down.
