It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.
Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.
I can't believe this is being discussed. Of course profiling has, should, and is being done.
What is the gender, age, and ethnicity of those that have perpetrated terrorist attacks in this country in the modern era ---- overwhelmingly, though, they constitute a small percentage of the population?
This has nothing to do with the Constitution. Jesus.
It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.
Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.
HTH
You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.
It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.
Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.
HTH
You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.
That really is all I need to say.
A meme would have been more effective but I was too lazy to grab one.
It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.
Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.
HTH
You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.
That really is all I need to say.
Cocktail and Road House made me the man I am today.
It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.
Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.
HTH
You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.
That really is all I need to say.
But for the definite wood hit of Elisabeth Shue, which gives you immunity, shame on you for referencing that FS horrible movie, Koopdog.
It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.
Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.
HTH
You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.
That really is all I need to say.
But for the definite wood hit of Elisabeth Shue, which gives you immunity, shame on you for referencing that FS horrible movie, Koopdog.
And a big fuck you for not recognizing Gina Gershon in that fuckfest of a movie. One damned fine woman.
Comments
HTH
What is the gender, age, and ethnicity of those that have perpetrated terrorist attacks in this country in the modern era ---- overwhelmingly, though, they constitute a small percentage of the population?
This has nothing to do with the Constitution. Jesus.
Grow up.
That really is all I need to say.