Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is a pretty balanced look at climate change

13468915

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited January 2014

    CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

    The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

    If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

    You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

    The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

    There's a sound bite.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

    The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

    If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

    You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

    The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

    There's a sound bite.
    image
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    edited January 2014
    Funny how CollegeDoog is so worried about these people yet has no issues with Todd Doxey jokes. Such a gentleman.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

    The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

    If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

    You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

    The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

    There's a sound bite.
    +1

    I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes

  • uw2010
    uw2010 Member Posts: 940
    I can't tell if this thread is full of win or full of fail.


    Abundance?
  • dnc said:

    CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

    The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

    If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

    You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

    The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

    There's a sound bite.
    +1

    I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes

    I'm for internet bullying.

    So there's that.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dnc said:

    CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

    The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

    If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

    You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

    The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

    There's a sound bite.
    +1

    I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes

    I support the troops
  • Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.

    You wouldn't even make the scout team

    Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.

    Two different kinds of skeptics.
    Are you talking about Lindzen or Derek Johnson?

    Abundance. As always.