HHB Glossary of Terms

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

Damone's right you know.

+1 and this.

The 2008 season ended when Willingham was hired in December of 2004.

RoadDawg55 said:

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

RaceBannon said:

MikeDamone said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

dhdawg said:

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

He_Needs_More_Time said:

TheKobeStopper said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

DerekJohnson said:

BAMAdawg10 said:

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one

I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.

It was originally Oregon, 2008

5 reasons was certainly 2008 because the OL in 2008 really did average 332 pounds. Goodwin, Chris Polk, Jordan Polk, Kearse, etc were newbies, but they did add the speed. However, winning rather easily, say 34-17 came from the Oklahoma game in 2006.

allpurpleallgold said:

phineas said:

Has anyone covered the "never had to play a ranked oregon state" thing?

He_needs_more_cock used it to favorably compare Sark to Don James.

MikeDamone said:

SandyHooker said:

RoadDawg55 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

RaceBannon said:

MikeDamone said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

dhdawg said:

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

He_Needs_More_Time said:

TheKobeStopper said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

DerekJohnson said:

BAMAdawg10 said:

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one

I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.

It was originally Oregon, 2008

5 reasons was certainly 2008 because the OL in 2008 really did average 332 pounds. Goodwin, Chris Polk, Jordan Polk, Kearse, etc were newbies, but they did add the speed. However, winning rather easily, say 34-17 came from the Oklahoma game in 2006.

I thought win rather easily was 2008 and the win rather easily was 35-17

Is it 34-17 or 35-17? I've seen both used.

abundance

Disagree. I copied 5 reasons directly in 2008 after it was posted and posted it without changes before every game that year. 34-17 was in the original. Maybe it was in Oklahoma 2006 too, but it was certainly part of the first 5 reasons.

RaceBannon said:

The longer they stay the worse they play

I can't wait to hate all our highly rated recruits in two years and call for the next highly rated recruits to replace them