Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
HHB Glossary of Terms
Comments
-
Is it 34-17 or 35-17? I've seen both used.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I thought win rather easily was 2008 and the win rather easily was 35-17RoadDawg55 said:
5 reasons was certainly 2008 because the OL in 2008 really did average 332 pounds. Goodwin, Chris Polk, Jordan Polk, Kearse, etc were newbies, but they did add the speed. However, winning rather easily, say 34-17 came from the Oklahoma game in 2006.MikeDamone said:
It was originally Oregon, 2008RoadDawg55 said:
I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.RaceBannon said:
Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this oneMikeDamone said:
34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon gameCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"dhdawg said:I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from
flagged for leaving out ossaiHe_Needs_More_Time said:
It was part of the same one.TheKobeStopper said:
Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.DerekJohnson said:
What's the story behind this one?BAMAdawg10 said:We win rather easily, say, 34-17?
BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.
2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.
3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.
4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.
5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.
I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"
This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
-
abundanceRoadDawg55 said:
Is it 34-17 or 35-17? I've seen both used.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I thought win rather easily was 2008 and the win rather easily was 35-17RoadDawg55 said:
5 reasons was certainly 2008 because the OL in 2008 really did average 332 pounds. Goodwin, Chris Polk, Jordan Polk, Kearse, etc were newbies, but they did add the speed. However, winning rather easily, say 34-17 came from the Oklahoma game in 2006.MikeDamone said:
It was originally Oregon, 2008RoadDawg55 said:
I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.RaceBannon said:
Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this oneMikeDamone said:
34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon gameCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"dhdawg said:I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from
flagged for leaving out ossaiHe_Needs_More_Time said:
It was part of the same one.TheKobeStopper said:
Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.DerekJohnson said:
What's the story behind this one?BAMAdawg10 said:We win rather easily, say, 34-17?
BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.
2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.
3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.
4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.
5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.
I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"
This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008. -
This is the case. 5 reasons had nothing to do with Bondawg and Oklahoma was before 2008. Some of you need to learn the differenceRoadDawg55 said:
5 reasons was certainly 2008 because the OL in 2008 really did average 332 pounds. Goodwin, Chris Polk, Jordan Polk, Kearse, etc were newbies, but they did add the speed. However, winning rather easily, say 34-17 came from the Oklahoma game in 2006.MikeDamone said:
It was originally Oregon, 2008RoadDawg55 said:
I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.RaceBannon said:
Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this oneMikeDamone said:
34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon gameCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"dhdawg said:I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from
flagged for leaving out ossaiHe_Needs_More_Time said:
It was part of the same one.TheKobeStopper said:
Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.DerekJohnson said:
What's the story behind this one?BAMAdawg10 said:We win rather easily, say, 34-17?
BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.
2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.
3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.
4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.
5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.
I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"
This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008. -
So Damone was not right
-
Or two seperate posters made fucktarded predictions about the same game.
-
Since Race is spoilin' for a fight on this, I see the 7-11 thing is FINALLY going to happen.allpurpleallgold said:Damone's right you know.
Moved? Who the fuck would let me move there?TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
You are always there to point out all the times that Damone is wrong but what about all the times that he is right?RaceBannon said:So Damone was not right
-
This is how I remember it as well. Both 5 reasons and the win rather easily prediction were from 2008 but 2 separate items that we've combined.RaceBannon said:
This is the case. 5 reasons had nothing to do with Bondawg and Oklahoma was before 2008. Some of you need to learn the differenceRoadDawg55 said:
5 reasons was certainly 2008 because the OL in 2008 really did average 332 pounds. Goodwin, Chris Polk, Jordan Polk, Kearse, etc were newbies, but they did add the speed. However, winning rather easily, say 34-17 came from the Oklahoma game in 2006.MikeDamone said:
It was originally Oregon, 2008RoadDawg55 said:
I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.RaceBannon said:
Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this oneMikeDamone said:
34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon gameCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"dhdawg said:I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from
flagged for leaving out ossaiHe_Needs_More_Time said:
It was part of the same one.TheKobeStopper said:
Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.DerekJohnson said:
What's the story behind this one?BAMAdawg10 said:We win rather easily, say, 34-17?
BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.
2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.
3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.
4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.
5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.
I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"
This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
-
Has anyone covered the "never had to play a ranked oregon state" thing?
-
Yes. That has been covered. Please ask own of the living in the past, "win a Rose Bowl and then pop off," Huskieie fan.phineas said:Has anyone covered the "never had to play a ranked oregon state" thing?
A good place to start would be AuburnDawgFS.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
