Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

HHB Glossary of Terms

1212224262730

Comments

  • Has friends in Portland who AGREE been added yet?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    dhdawg said:

    I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

    We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

    What's the story behind this one?
    I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

    BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
    Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.
    It was part of the same one.

    "1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

    2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

    3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

    4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

    5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

    I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

    This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
    flagged for leaving out ossai
    Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"
    34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club

    dhdawg said:

    I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

    We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

    What's the story behind this one?
    I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

    BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
    Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.
    It was part of the same one.

    "1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

    2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

    3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

    4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

    5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

    I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

    This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
    flagged for leaving out ossai
    Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"
    34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game
    Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,806 Founders Club

    dhdawg said:

    I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

    We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

    What's the story behind this one?
    I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

    BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
    Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.
    It was part of the same one.

    "1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

    2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

    3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

    4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

    5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

    I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

    This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
    flagged for leaving out ossai
    Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"
    34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game
    Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one
    That's how I remember it as well.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    From the relatively short time I've spent here this is how I perceive the HH Heirarchy :
    Derek Johnson - founder and benevolent dictator
    Race Bannon - a well respected elder, emissary to rival forums, originator of many famous stories (like those at Autzen).
    TierbsHsotBoobs - also known as Sven (I think), possible founding member or one of the original revolutionaries that started the war against Dawgman.com.
    DNC, CuntWaffle, He_needs_more_time and a few others - higher ranked minions that try to keep things dialed in.

    Am I very far off?

    Yes, you are.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club

    dhdawg said:

    I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

    We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

    What's the story behind this one?
    I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

    BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
    Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.
    It was part of the same one.

    "1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

    2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

    3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

    4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

    5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

    I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

    This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
    flagged for leaving out ossai
    Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"
    34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game
    Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one
    That's how I remember it as well.
    You've always been one of my favorite posters
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,405 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2014

    dhdawg said:

    I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

    We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

    What's the story behind this one?
    I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

    BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
    Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.
    It was part of the same one.

    "1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

    2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

    3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

    4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

    5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

    I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

    This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
    flagged for leaving out ossai
    Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"
    34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game
    Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one
    I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.

  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

    dhdawg said:

    I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

    We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

    What's the story behind this one?
    I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

    BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.
    Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.
    It was part of the same one.

    "1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

    2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

    3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

    4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

    5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

    I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

    This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.
    flagged for leaving out ossai
    Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"
    34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game
    Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one
    That's how I remember it as well.
    You've always been one of my favorite posters
    Classy post.















    Ps- I really like how you've embraced the quote function since our little chat.