Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Voter suppression is a good idea

13

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    edited November 2018
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,691
    SFGbob said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days.
    I think we can all agree that things went down hill when they got the vote
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    SFGbob said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,050 Founders Club
    I don't see any reason to make it easy for stupid or lazy people to vote

    If that's your base that's your problem not mine
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
    Oh I know, the Rats have made an art form out of getting the votes of people who pay little if any taxes while demanding all kinds of "free" shit. The takers far, far out number the makers and the Rats have a hammer lock on that vote.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
    Oh I know, the Rats have made an art form out of getting the votes of people who pay little if any taxes while demanding all kinds of "free" shit. The takers far, far out number the makers and the Rats have a hammer lock on that vote.
    Yeah. Appalachian welfare is different than Harlem welfare, isn't it?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    dflea said:

    SFGbob said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
    Oh I know, the Rats have made an art form out of getting the votes of people who pay little if any taxes while demanding all kinds of "free" shit. The takers far, far out number the makers and the Rats have a hammer lock on that vote.
    Yeah. Appalachian welfare is different than Harlem welfare, isn't it?
    I don't put a skin color on parasites, appears you do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Sledog said:

    Voter suppression in Floriduh going on as we speak as dem operative excludes repub ballots.

    Outraged?

    Clockwork shill
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    edited November 2018
    In this thread sofuckinggayboob wants to take rights away from American citizens.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    BennyBeaver said:

    In this thread sofuckinggayboob wants to take rights away from American citizens.

    They want to steal my labor from me. I don't want anything from them. If they want to vote they can either join the military or start being a net tax payer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter