USC, 6 commits, all in the trenches
Comments
-
You can't just run the ball every time! You have to keep the defense guessing. Those 2 yard bubble screens loosen the defense up.DerekJohnson said:If we're going to start bashing 2-yard gains from bubble screens, I'm out
-
The running game also suffered due to extremely predictable play calling... I tracked play calling for a few games last year and shortly discovered a disturbing trend. If Sark ran a "failed" pass play (incomplete, sack, or less than 2 yards) on first down Sark's next call was a running play over 80% of the time, this trend continued at a similar rate for the rest of the year. If I can figure that out, any fucktard defensive coach not named AWESOME Holt can. The offensive line blocking is pretty inconsistent and seems to fluctuate wildly from game to game. Sankey is pretty good, RB development has been surprisingly good during the Sark era. However I think that the RB coach has moved on?
-
How come when Oregon or Arizona run bubble screens on us the guy is wide open and has blockers and it goes for 15 yards but when we run it, the WR already has a CB draped over him when he catches the ball and falls forward for 1 yard?
-
Bubble screen in Sark's playbook has an asterisk and at the bottom of the page the caption reads, "Bubble Screen a.k.a. Our O-line can't pass block for shit...the defense will never know it's coming...Oregon runs it, so can we!"
-
Those bubble screens are an extension of the running game!!!!!RoadDawg55 said:
You can't just run the ball every time! You have to keep the defense guessing. Those 2 yard bubble screens loosen the defense up.DerekJohnson said:If we're going to start bashing 2-yard gains from bubble screens, I'm out
-
Burn!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Well Dabone, you've never been recognized as brilliant. Read more of my posts, you might learn something about college football instead of hiding your ignorance behind a wall of sarcasm and semanices. You and Kim are a lot alikeMikeDamone said:
Was it classy?DerekJohnson said:this is a solid, congruent poast.
I have to admit, it's one of a very few by PLSS that I could decipher on the first read through. -
Sark will be starting his 5th season without a proven unit of interior offensive linemen of Pac-12 starting quality or caliber. The operative word on this kafuffle is proven which means that whomever starts from tackle to tackle will have to prove themselves immediately with dominating performances at home against Boise State and against Illinois on the road where Sark's offenses have hardly been dominating against anybody. And then they'll have to stay healthy against Idaho State and beyond for there is no proven OL depth in backup and when was the last Husky OL to make through a 12-game season without injury.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Even under sanctions Kitten gets it. I wonder what Sark would do with 15 free lunches. He'd prolly have 3WR's , 1 2-star DE, and 2 linebackers who wouldn't start at San Diego St. Kiffin recruits offensive linemen better under sanctions than Sark does with a full boat.
No worries, Micheal Kniep (a walk on) is going to start over Sark's entire 2011. on-line class. Then last years Big-3 is going to sit on the bench for 4 years, 2 of which will be under a new head coach. Way to go Sark, thanks for building up the most important position group on the team. uEven your new homicide offense wont work when NOBODY on the oline can get out and pull, run and block downfield. I'd hate to be Sankey. poor dude is going to have to shake and bake, spin, make people miss to reach 1000 yards like last year. Imagine if he had a Andrew Peterson or Benji Olson out in front of him on every play. screen passes to Sankey? (not in Sarks playbook)
I don't think I ever saw Sankey have a lead blocker @ the second level under Sark. If Sankey ran behind a good oline he'd be capable of the Doak Walker. That's how good he is .
0Please Sark go out and sign 5 good olinemen for our next head coach!
This is a daunting task for a collegiate football program to get this far into a rebuilding program with no proven results in either the offensive or defensive lines. I had a thought during Spring practices that Sark and staff had gone to the no-huddle hurry-up offense in scrimmages not so much to introduce a new offense for the purpose of compensating for the lack of a proven offensive line, but perhaps to prepare an equally unproven defensive front to stop such offenses run by opponents. Thus, we might steal one or two more upset wins with tough defense like the Dawgs did last season over Stanford and OSU.
Wouldn't it be nice to start winning games again with defense and not have to worry so much about Sark's playground youth club offense?
-
I noticed this his first few games and it has driven me nuts for the last 3 years.Houhusky said:The running game also suffered due to extremely predictable play calling... I tracked play calling for a few games last year and shortly discovered a disturbing trend. If Sark ran a "failed" pass play (incomplete, sack, or less than 2 yards) on first down Sark's next call was a running play over 80% of the time, this trend continued at a similar rate for the rest of the year. If I can figure that out, any fucktard defensive coach not named AWESOME Holt can. The offensive line blocking is pretty inconsistent and seems to fluctuate wildly from game to game. Sankey is pretty good, RB development has been surprisingly good during the Sark era. However I think that the RB coach has moved on?
If Sark calls a pass on 1st and 10, and if its incomplete or like you said a "failed" pass play he calls a run play almost every time. It's annoying that a drunk fuck like me can notice that shit. How easy do you think it is for an opposing college football coach that gets paid millions of dollars to see more complicated shit than that? -
If you guys keep revealing this sort of info you won't be allowed to watch practices or games anymore.CheersWestDawg said:
I noticed this his first few games and it has driven me nuts for the last 3 years.Houhusky said:The running game also suffered due to extremely predictable play calling... I tracked play calling for a few games last year and shortly discovered a disturbing trend. If Sark ran a "failed" pass play (incomplete, sack, or less than 2 yards) on first down Sark's next call was a running play over 80% of the time, this trend continued at a similar rate for the rest of the year. If I can figure that out, any fucktard defensive coach not named AWESOME Holt can. The offensive line blocking is pretty inconsistent and seems to fluctuate wildly from game to game. Sankey is pretty good, RB development has been surprisingly good during the Sark era. However I think that the RB coach has moved on?
If Sark calls a pass on 1st and 10, and if its incomplete or like you said a "failed" pass play he calls a run play almost every time. It's annoying that a drunk fuck like me can notice that shit. How easy do you think it is for an opposing college football coach that gets paid millions of dollars to see more complicated shit than that? -
Sad that you still don't get it and are completely lost on every thread. Might want to take a step back from the key board for a while and pour some gasoline on yourself.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Well Dabone, you've never been recognized as brilliant. Read more of my posts, you might learn something about college football instead of hiding your ignorance behind a wall of sarcasm and semanices. You and Kim are a lot alikeMikeDamone said:
Was it classy?DerekJohnson said:this is a solid, congruent poast.
I have to admit, it's one of a very few by PLSS that I could decipher on the first read through.






