Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
USC, 6 commits, all in the trenches
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
Even under sanctions Kitten gets it. I wonder what Sark would do with 15 free lunches. He'd prolly have 3WR's , 1 2-star DE, and 2 linebackers who wouldn't start at San Diego St. Kiffin recruits offensive linemen better under sanctions than Sark does with a full boat.
No worries, Micheal Kniep (a walk on) is going to start over Sark's entire 2011. on-line class. Then last years Big-3 is going to sit on the bench for 4 years, 2 of which will be under a new head coach. Way to go Sark, thanks for building up the most important position group on the team. uEven your new homicide offense wont work when NOBODY on the oline can get out and pull, run and block downfield. I'd hate to be Sankey. poor dude is going to have to shake and bake, spin, make people miss to reach 1000 yards like last year. Imagine if he had a Andrew Peterson or Benji Olson out in front of him on every play. screen passes to Sankey? (not in Sarks playbook)
I don't think I ever saw Sankey have a lead blocker @ the second level under Sark. If Sankey ran behind a good oline he'd be capable of the Doak Walker. That's how good he is .
0Please Sark go out and sign 5 good olinemen for our next head coach!
No worries, Micheal Kniep (a walk on) is going to start over Sark's entire 2011. on-line class. Then last years Big-3 is going to sit on the bench for 4 years, 2 of which will be under a new head coach. Way to go Sark, thanks for building up the most important position group on the team. uEven your new homicide offense wont work when NOBODY on the oline can get out and pull, run and block downfield. I'd hate to be Sankey. poor dude is going to have to shake and bake, spin, make people miss to reach 1000 yards like last year. Imagine if he had a Andrew Peterson or Benji Olson out in front of him on every play. screen passes to Sankey? (not in Sarks playbook)
I don't think I ever saw Sankey have a lead blocker @ the second level under Sark. If Sankey ran behind a good oline he'd be capable of the Doak Walker. That's how good he is .
0Please Sark go out and sign 5 good olinemen for our next head coach!
Comments
I have to admit, it's one of a very few by PLSS that I could decipher on the first read through.
A smart coach tries to make it easy for his players to succeed. In other words, you play to your strengths. Last year, we had an OL that couldn't pass block and an immobile QB, but we still threw the ball often, and ran read option. Sark is stubborn and runs what he wants to run, whether he has the personnel to do it or not.
Simple fact.
This is a daunting task for a collegiate football program to get this far into a rebuilding program with no proven results in either the offensive or defensive lines. I had a thought during Spring practices that Sark and staff had gone to the no-huddle hurry-up offense in scrimmages not so much to introduce a new offense for the purpose of compensating for the lack of a proven offensive line, but perhaps to prepare an equally unproven defensive front to stop such offenses run by opponents. Thus, we might steal one or two more upset wins with tough defense like the Dawgs did last season over Stanford and OSU.
Wouldn't it be nice to start winning games again with defense and not have to worry so much about Sark's playground youth club offense?
If Sark calls a pass on 1st and 10, and if its incomplete or like you said a "failed" pass play he calls a run play almost every time. It's annoying that a drunk fuck like me can notice that shit. How easy do you think it is for an opposing college football coach that gets paid millions of dollars to see more complicated shit than that?