Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
USC, 6 commits, all in the trenches
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
Even under sanctions Kitten gets it. I wonder what Sark would do with 15 free lunches. He'd prolly have 3WR's , 1 2-star DE, and 2 linebackers who wouldn't start at San Diego St. Kiffin recruits offensive linemen better under sanctions than Sark does with a full boat.
No worries, Micheal Kniep (a walk on) is going to start over Sark's entire 2011. on-line class. Then last years Big-3 is going to sit on the bench for 4 years, 2 of which will be under a new head coach. Way to go Sark, thanks for building up the most important position group on the team. uEven your new homicide offense wont work when NOBODY on the oline can get out and pull, run and block downfield. I'd hate to be Sankey. poor dude is going to have to shake and bake, spin, make people miss to reach 1000 yards like last year. Imagine if he had a Andrew Peterson or Benji Olson out in front of him on every play. screen passes to Sankey? (not in Sarks playbook)
I don't think I ever saw Sankey have a lead blocker @ the second level under Sark. If Sankey ran behind a good oline he'd be capable of the Doak Walker. That's how good he is .
0Please Sark go out and sign 5 good olinemen for our next head coach!
No worries, Micheal Kniep (a walk on) is going to start over Sark's entire 2011. on-line class. Then last years Big-3 is going to sit on the bench for 4 years, 2 of which will be under a new head coach. Way to go Sark, thanks for building up the most important position group on the team. uEven your new homicide offense wont work when NOBODY on the oline can get out and pull, run and block downfield. I'd hate to be Sankey. poor dude is going to have to shake and bake, spin, make people miss to reach 1000 yards like last year. Imagine if he had a Andrew Peterson or Benji Olson out in front of him on every play. screen passes to Sankey? (not in Sarks playbook)
I don't think I ever saw Sankey have a lead blocker @ the second level under Sark. If Sankey ran behind a good oline he'd be capable of the Doak Walker. That's how good he is .
0Please Sark go out and sign 5 good olinemen for our next head coach!
Comments
-
this is a solid, congruent poast.
-
Was it classy?DerekJohnson said:this is a solid, congruent poast.
I have to admit, it's one of a very few by PLSS that I could decipher on the first read through. -
Besides the LSU game, I thought Sankey got decent blocking. It wasn't great, but our OL was above average at run blocking. The problem was Sark does not stick with it and stalls drives by trying to get cute. He frequently wastes plays. He would try to pass after we were successfully running the ball and the result was often a sack or incomplete pass that would basically kill the drive. He also wastes the first play after every turnover by trying to go deep every time. The other team knows it is coming, and it never works. It's so fucking frustrating.
A smart coach tries to make it easy for his players to succeed. In other words, you play to your strengths. Last year, we had an OL that couldn't pass block and an immobile QB, but we still threw the ball often, and ran read option. Sark is stubborn and runs what he wants to run, whether he has the personnel to do it or not. -
Well Dabone, you've never been recognized as brilliant. Read more of my posts, you might learn something about college football instead of hiding your ignorance behind a wall of sarcasm and semanices. You and Kim are a lot alikeMikeDamone said:
Was it classy?DerekJohnson said:this is a solid, congruent poast.
I have to admit, it's one of a very few by PLSS that I could decipher on the first read through.
-
that would be" semantics" (word correct)
-
Or you could just edit the post, Cuntwaffle.puppylove_sugarsteel said:that would be" semantics" (word correct)
-
god I love that word. don't know why, but I do.
-
Good post. Aren't we on the big white kid from Tumwater? He should be good......
-
You don't win football game by having a legit line. You win games by throwing a bunch of bubble screens to 4* recievers for a gain of 2.
Simple fact. -
If we're going to start bashing 2-yard gains from bubble screens, I'm out
