Recruiting IQ Test #2: How realistic are you?
Recruiting IQ Test #2: How realistic are you? 56 votes
8 votes
45 votes
3 votes
Comments
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?Answer key:No - IQ of 12. You should light yourself on fire and take a rocket into the sun.
Yes - IQ of 115+. Good, you can stay. You understand that there are no excuses for shitty classes. We need good players, period.
I'm Not Sure - IQ of 115 or below. In order for this species to survive, we can only have the cream of the crop. Kill yourself. -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
-
Appreciate you Dennis.
Also, worry about you, Dennis. -
I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.Crawfish said:I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
Awfully warm for Friday, but do it!!!!Dennis_DeYoung said:
There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.Crawfish said:I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
-
I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
Fine, you peer pressured me to vote for the "I'm not sure" option. Please let the record show that my vote was under duress.Dennis_DeYoung said:
There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.Crawfish said:I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
So noted.Crawfish said:
Fine, you peer pressured me to vote for the "I'm not sure" option. Please let the record show that my vote was under duress.Dennis_DeYoung said:
There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.Crawfish said:I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?Can't take years off either
Need to stack top 15 classes and league titles like cord wood to get to the top of the nation
And it's a long way
To the top
If you want to rock and roll -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.Crawfish said:I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
Race GETS IT.RaceBannon said:Can't take years off either
Need to stack top 15 classes and league titles like cord wood to get to the top of the nation
And it's a long way
To the top
If you want to rock and roll -
I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.We still let Bob Gregory recruit LBs to play behind Malloe’s DT’s and in front of Lakes secondary.
We launched Chris Strausser, CFB’s best tactical and development OL coach, for Huff. We traded Pete’s bosom buddy, Brent Pease, for unproven Matt Lubick and we keep a RB coach who prefers working beef over upgrading Kamari Pleasant and our new power back, Sean McGrew.
Considering my sub 116 IQ, I’m obviously missing something... -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?This.
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?I just want to note that I thoroughly enjoy when you Chin your own rants.
I just love Dennis being Dennis. -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?Your standards are too low Dennis ... Top 10 is the floor IMO going forward
-
No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!voted No because it was losing
-
I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
You have a big heart. Bless your soul.El_K said:voted No because it was losing
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?Are you allowed to "chincredible" your own post?
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
Only if you're a mod.Passion said:Are you allowed to "chincredible" your own post?
Some of us are more equal than others. -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
I have no idea what you’re talking about.HillsboroDuck said:
Only if you're a mod.Passion said:Are you allowed to "chincredible" your own post?
Some of us are more equal than others. -
No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!But not for the reason you stated. Pete doesn't let guys go so our classes are smaller. Which is why we do better on the composite ranking than the regular. And why Sark classes looked better on paper (cause he always had room for 26 recruits).
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
Jesus Christ. Top 15 overall, top 10 average recruit rating. You think we can’t do that?2001400ex said:But not for the reason you stated. Pete doesn't let guys go so our classes are smaller. Which is why we do better on the composite ranking than the regular. And why Sark classes looked better on paper (cause he always had room for 26 recruits).
I’m shaking and about to vomit. -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?Come watch hondo struggle on every bored
-
No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!
Every single year? We SHOULD be able to do that, yes. But the way Pete is, he wants to build him team on the BBKs of the world, and is arrogant enough to think he can win with them.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Jesus Christ. Top 15 overall, top 10 average recruit rating. You think we can’t do that?2001400ex said:But not for the reason you stated. Pete doesn't let guys go so our classes are smaller. Which is why we do better on the composite ranking than the regular. And why Sark classes looked better on paper (cause he always had room for 26 recruits).
I’m shaking and about to vomit.
HTH -
I think there's a degree of truth in thi statement. Love to have fatters bring this up in the weekly media scrum2001400ex said:
Every single year? We SHOULD be able to do that, yes. But the way Pete is, he wants to build him team on the BBKs of the world, and is arrogant enough to think he can win with them.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Jesus Christ. Top 15 overall, top 10 average recruit rating. You think we can’t do that?2001400ex said:But not for the reason you stated. Pete doesn't let guys go so our classes are smaller. Which is why we do better on the composite ranking than the regular. And why Sark classes looked better on paper (cause he always had room for 26 recruits).
I’m shaking and about to vomit.
HTH
-
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?I don't think Pete WANTS to have scrappy white guys, I think it was what he could get at Boise
You act like he could come in here after a decade plus of shit and bring in top ten classes. Its hard
Well now he his and I am pretty sure he is as unhappy with having our bend and then bend some more defense as we? are
He can do it and there is no reason to expect anything else unless you are hondoFS -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
This.RaceBannon said:I don't think Pete WANTS to have scrappy white guys, I think it was what he could get at Boise
You act like he could come in here after a decade plus of shit and bring in top ten classes. Its hard
Well now he his and I am pretty sure he is as unhappy with having our bend and then bend some more defense as we? are
He can do it and there is no reason to expect anything else unless you are hondoFS
Next year we are already top 2-5 for basically every good player on the West Coast. Does anyone think that for some reason recruiting will be worse?
The Doog is so strong in people, they just cannot fucking let it go. Let it go. -
No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!
The question was "is it realistic".... With Pete, he will never consistently recruit top 15 classes. I think we should, but that's not who he is. He loves the try hard white guy that is underrated.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This.RaceBannon said:I don't think Pete WANTS to have scrappy white guys, I think it was what he could get at Boise
You act like he could come in here after a decade plus of shit and bring in top ten classes. Its hard
Well now he his and I am pretty sure he is as unhappy with having our bend and then bend some more defense as we? are
He can do it and there is no reason to expect anything else unless you are hondoFS
Next year we are already top 2-5 for basically every good player on the West Coast. Does anyone think that for some reason recruiting will be worse?
The Doog is so strong in people, they just cannot fucking let it go. Let it go. -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
So, I think it's probably a bit premature to talk about 2022... but in 2019, 2020 and 2021 we have a good shot to end up top 15.2001400ex said:
The question was "is it realistic".... With Pete, he will never consistently recruit top 15 classes. I think we should, but that's not who he is. He loves the try hard white guy that is underrated.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This.RaceBannon said:I don't think Pete WANTS to have scrappy white guys, I think it was what he could get at Boise
You act like he could come in here after a decade plus of shit and bring in top ten classes. Its hard
Well now he his and I am pretty sure he is as unhappy with having our bend and then bend some more defense as we? are
He can do it and there is no reason to expect anything else unless you are hondoFS
Next year we are already top 2-5 for basically every good player on the West Coast. Does anyone think that for some reason recruiting will be worse?
The Doog is so strong in people, they just cannot fucking let it go. Let it go.
Is there a reason that's going to change?
I know Pete has as soft spot for try hards... but I don't see one try-hard in this year's commits:
Drew - probably the closest
Cam - no
Taj - no
Nate - hell no
Julius - no
Troy - F no
Corey - no
Pa'ama - F no
Ngalu - second closest?
Tuitele - fuck no
Bandes - no
Trice - the opposite
Ah You - close, but he's fast and 6-2
Tuputala - the opposite
KamFab - fuck no
Turner - Jesus no
Cam - he had a 3 hour commit announcement -
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
WTF is Drew? You mean Dylan old man?Dennis_DeYoung said:
So, I think it's probably a bit premature to talk about 2022... but in 2019, 2020 and 2021 we have a good shot to end up top 15.2001400ex said:
The question was "is it realistic".... With Pete, he will never consistently recruit top 15 classes. I think we should, but that's not who he is. He loves the try hard white guy that is underrated.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This.RaceBannon said:I don't think Pete WANTS to have scrappy white guys, I think it was what he could get at Boise
You act like he could come in here after a decade plus of shit and bring in top ten classes. Its hard
Well now he his and I am pretty sure he is as unhappy with having our bend and then bend some more defense as we? are
He can do it and there is no reason to expect anything else unless you are hondoFS
Next year we are already top 2-5 for basically every good player on the West Coast. Does anyone think that for some reason recruiting will be worse?
The Doog is so strong in people, they just cannot fucking let it go. Let it go.
Is there a reason that's going to change?
I know Pete has as soft spot for try hards... but I don't see one try-hard in this year's commits:
Drew - probably the closest
Cam - no
Taj - no
Nate - hell no
Julius - no
Troy - F no
Corey - no
Pa'ama - F no
Ngalu - second closest?
Tuitele - fuck no
Bandes - no
Trice - the opposite
Ah You - close, but he's fast and 6-2
Tuputala - the opposite
KamFab - fuck no
Turner - Jesus no
Cam - he had a 3 hour commit announcement
