Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon game: what we know

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    edited October 2018

    Harv says Petersen should be fired for playing a hurt Gaskin

    So there's tbat

    Coogs forget that Leach gave one of his QBs fatal CTE.
  • RedRocket
    RedRocket Member Posts: 1,527

    Not to boast or anything, but I've got a 65-70% win ratio of picking teams on Saturday over the last two years. Said the Stanford game would come down to less than a touchdown, that we would beat a ranked Cal team on the road by 2-4 TDs.

    My call for this game hasn't changed. We establish the run vs UW and win by a margin of 1-2 touchdowns imo. Very different from last year, when I picked UW to win rather easily.

    Where was this confidence a few weeks ago when you didn't have the stones to make a bet with J?
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    RedRocket said:

    Not to boast or anything, but I've got a 65-70% win ratio of picking teams on Saturday over the last two years. Said the Stanford game would come down to less than a touchdown, that we would beat a ranked Cal team on the road by 2-4 TDs.

    My call for this game hasn't changed. We establish the run vs UW and win by a margin of 1-2 touchdowns imo. Very different from last year, when I picked UW to win rather easily.

    Where was this confidence a few weeks ago when you didn't have the stones to make a bet with J?
    I'm not going to look it up but J's original bet was virtually the same bet I ended up making with Doog De Jour. He took a comment I made about the gulag out of proportion and wanted to turn it into a year long gulag bet, not something I ever agreed to. To throw him a bone, I added a month long gulag penalty for backing out of the bet. Even after all of that, he didn't take the bet, so it's on him, not on me.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    PurpleJ said:

    RedRocket said:

    Not to boast or anything, but I've got a 65-70% win ratio of picking teams on Saturday over the last two years. Said the Stanford game would come down to less than a touchdown, that we would beat a ranked Cal team on the road by 2-4 TDs.

    My call for this game hasn't changed. We establish the run vs UW and win by a margin of 1-2 touchdowns imo. Very different from last year, when I picked UW to win rather easily.

    Where was this confidence a few weeks ago when you didn't have the stones to make a bet with J?
    I'm not going to look it up but J's original bet was virtually the same bet I ended up making with Doog De Jour. He took a comment I made about the gulag out of proportion and wanted to turn it into a year long gulag bet, not something I ever agreed to. To throw him a bone, I added a month long gulag penalty for backing out of the bet. Even after all of that, he didn't take the bet, so it's on him, not on me.
    Bet's still on the table you giant fucking pussy.
    You bailed so a bet was made. Ask Doog De Jour maybe you can still get in on it, maybe she'll give up 6 months of avatar control and let you have the other 6 if I lose. UW loses and I get to change both of your avatars. It's her call though, not mine. It's a way to prove you're really as confident and you want everyone to think you are.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,720 Founders Club
    lawsandl said:

    UW certainly hasn’t looked all world against the run.

    Shocking since Nickel is our base D.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    PurpleJ said:

    Avatar bet? What is this? Grade school? Be a MAN and bet your account on the game. Pussy.

    Avatar bet was your original bet. Hth.
  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW certainly hasn’t looked all world against the run.

    Shocking since Nickel is our base D.

    That’s kind of par for the course in CFB.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    ^

    Champions don't complain, they overcome. We? won't be complaining about our tough schedule next year that begins with a showdown against SEC heavy hitter Auburn (they're not good this year, but still...) and ends with 3 straight road games against Stanford, USC and UW.
  • DawgWagonDan
    DawgWagonDan Member Posts: 789
    ntxduck said:

    Gladstone said:

    1. Herbert is good. Maybe great. Who knows? Has zero wins against any teams of consequence, but is super accurate and fast. He's what doogs think Locker was.
    2. Oregon played, according to S&P, the worst OOC schedule in the history of the FBS. Stanford has been exposed. Likewise Cal. Embarrassing levels of bad.
    3. Every intangible favors Oregon. Home game. Bye week rest. Revenge (lol). UW is beaten up and missing multiple key starters, Gaskin is hobbled, and Browning is QB

    Oregon is likely somewhere between mediocre and mildly decent, with a porous secondary, but no one really knows.

    No idea how this game shakes out. Reading too much into a sleepwalk performance against UCLA is dumb.

    What happened to gaskin?
    "like we say, he's fine" Coach Pete