Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon game: what we know

13»

Comments

  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    UW certainly hasn’t looked all world against the run.

    Shocking since Nickel is our base D.

    That’s kind of par for the course in CFB.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    ^

    Champions don't complain, they overcome. We? won't be complaining about our tough schedule next year that begins with a showdown against SEC heavy hitter Auburn (they're not good this year, but still...) and ends with 3 straight road games against Stanford, USC and UW.
  • DawgWagonDanDawgWagonDan Member Posts: 789
    ntxduck said:

    Gladstone said:

    1. Herbert is good. Maybe great. Who knows? Has zero wins against any teams of consequence, but is super accurate and fast. He's what doogs think Locker was.
    2. Oregon played, according to S&P, the worst OOC schedule in the history of the FBS. Stanford has been exposed. Likewise Cal. Embarrassing levels of bad.
    3. Every intangible favors Oregon. Home game. Bye week rest. Revenge (lol). UW is beaten up and missing multiple key starters, Gaskin is hobbled, and Browning is QB

    Oregon is likely somewhere between mediocre and mildly decent, with a porous secondary, but no one really knows.

    No idea how this game shakes out. Reading too much into a sleepwalk performance against UCLA is dumb.

    What happened to gaskin?
    "like we say, he's fine" Coach Pete
Sign In or Register to comment.