Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Recruiting IQ Test #2: How realistic are you?

24

Comments

  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?

    Can't take years off either

    Need to stack top 15 classes and league titles like cord wood to get to the top of the nation

    And it's a long way

    To the top

    If you want to rock and roll

    Race GETS IT.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,381
    edited October 2018
    I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
    We still let Bob Gregory recruit LBs to play behind Malloe’s DT’s and in front of Lakes secondary.

    We launched Chris Strausser, CFB’s best tactical and development OL coach, for Huff. We traded Pete’s bosom buddy, Brent Pease, for unproven Matt Lubick and we keep a RB coach who prefers working beef over upgrading Kamari Pleasant and our new power back, Sean McGrew.

    Considering my sub 116 IQ, I’m obviously missing something...
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    This.
  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    I just want to note that I thoroughly enjoy when you Chin your own rants.

    I just love Dennis being Dennis.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,234
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Your standards are too low Dennis ... Top 10 is the floor IMO going forward
  • El_K
    El_K Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,532 Swaye's Wigwam
    No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!
    voted No because it was losing
  • Crawfish
    Crawfish Member Posts: 734
    I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
    El_K said:

    voted No because it was losing

    You have a big heart. Bless your soul.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Are you allowed to "chincredible" your own post?




  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Passion said:

    Are you allowed to "chincredible" your own post?




    Only if you're a mod.







    Some of us are more equal than others.