When Gaskin leaves....

LuxrayBeats said:

HillsboroDuck said:

LuxrayBeats said:

Gaskin is a great player. He is one of my favorite Huskies to ever suit up.

However, we will be just fine without him. Ahmed will get stronger and more refined this offseason, prepping for the increased amount of snaps. Right now, Ahmed has been statistically more effective. He is averaging 7.1 yards per carry, while Myles is averaging 4.5 yards per carry.

Stanford could have freaked out that they were losing McCaffery. They didn't, instead Bryce Love became a thing. It will be the same story with Ahmed. He has shown enough flashes to convince me that we will be just fine in 2019. Kamari Pleasant is also going to be really good, and I am sure they will also work Dick Newton in there, who's body looks incredible. Yeah and there is Sean McGrew, who actually looks pretty decent this year. Give all these young pups another year in the weight room, and I actually love our runningback situation in 2019. Don't forget about Cam Davis coming in either.

That is college football. You bring in new guys and you develop them. Ahmed will be better in a year than he is now. That's not up for debate. It's a given.

No, it's not.

Players get better the longer they play under Pete. When Ahmed was coming in, we didn't even know what side of the ball he was going to play on. Of COURSE he will get better.

Gaskin is the exact same runner he's always been with some minor improvements as a receiver which we never took advantage of. It's likely Ahmed will improve some going forward. It's far from a given..

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

Should we fire the running backs coach?

@NorwegianHusky tells me that running backs don't actually require any coaching and we should judge the coach based on how many 5* recruits they have in June.

You can't teach instincts like Gaskin's. Just look at Salvon. When Gaskin leaves you're gonna see how spoiled we have been with him. Or maybe you won't see it, because you're a retard.

Salvon will be a good running back. Or maybe you don't see it, because you're a retard.

Point is you wanted the RB coach fired in June because you didn't like his recruits. Well, the fact that we've had 2-3 good backs every year he's been here says differently. So does the head coach.

In short, the results say fuck you. Doogs hate results.

Learn to fucking read. I never said Salvon would be bad. I loved him as a recruit. I said he doesn't have the kind of instincts Gaskin has, and likely never will. The results on the field have been good, FOR NOW. However, the results in recruiting haven't been. That could lead to worse results in the future, but you don't like to look at more than one thing, because you're fucking stupid. Thankfully, we're getting Cameron Davis this year, and that might save us. But in between Davis and Ahmed, our RB recruiting has been like our WR recruiting under Pease. See how our WRs suck now outside of Fuller? Funny how that works. Now shut the fuck up.

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

Should we fire the running backs coach?

@NorwegianHusky tells me that running backs don't actually require any coaching and we should judge the coach based on how many 5* recruits they have in June.

You can't teach instincts like Gaskin's. Just look at Salvon. When Gaskin leaves you're gonna see how spoiled we have been with him. Or maybe you won't see it, because you're a retard.

Salvon will be a good running back. Or maybe you don't see it, because you're a retard.

Point is you wanted the RB coach fired in June because you didn't like his recruits. Well, the fact that we've had 2-3 good backs every year he's been here says differently. So does the head coach.

In short, the results say fuck you. Doogs hate results.

Learn to fucking read. I never said Salvon would be bad. I loved him as a recruit. I said he doesn't have the kind of instincts Gaskin has, and likely never will. The results on the field have been good, FOR NOW. However, the results in recruiting haven't been. That could lead to worse results in the future, but you don't like to look at more than one thing, because you're fucking stupid. Thankfully, we're getting Cameron Davis this year, and that might save us. But in between Davis and Ahmed, our RB recruiting has been like our WR recruiting under Pease. See how our WRs suck now outside of Fuller? Funny how that works. Now shut the fuck up.

When the running backs coach has done nothing but produce superior results year in year out and you want him fired in June because you don't think he is recruiting well enough, you leave me no choice but to incessantly mock your dumb ass. Yeah I'm sure he won't sign a decent back this year...sigh. Typical reactionary recruiting fag. Doogman is definitely more your speed.

CaptainPJ said:

Ahmed will gain another 15-20 lbs and be just fine between the tackles.

Think: Rahsaan Sheehee.

Or am I dealing with a bunch of dumbfuck Millenial doogs here?

Dumbfuck millennial here. I'm with you on this one.

But hopeless doogs like @NorwegianHusky tell me that running backs don't actually need to be coached. What a retard.

LuxrayBeats said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

Should we fire the running backs coach?

@NorwegianHusky tells me that running backs don't actually require any coaching and we should judge the coach based on how many 5* recruits they have in June.

You can't teach instincts like Gaskin's. Just look at Salvon. When Gaskin leaves you're gonna see how spoiled we have been with him. Or maybe you won't see it, because you're a retard.

Salvon will be a good running back. Or maybe you don't see it, because you're a retard.

Point is you wanted the RB coach fired in June because you didn't like his recruits. Well, the fact that we've had 2-3 good backs every year he's been here says differently. So does the head coach.

In short, the results say fuck you. Doogs hate results.

Learn to fucking read. I never said Salvon would be bad. I loved him as a recruit. I said he doesn't have the kind of instincts Gaskin has, and likely never will. The results on the field have been good, FOR NOW. However, the results in recruiting haven't been. That could lead to worse results in the future, but you don't like to look at more than one thing, because you're fucking stupid. Thankfully, we're getting Cameron Davis this year, and that might save us. But in between Davis and Ahmed, our RB recruiting has been like our WR recruiting under Pease. See how our WRs suck now outside of Fuller? Funny how that works. Now shut the fuck up.

When the running backs coach has done nothing but produce superior results year in year out and you want him fired in June because you don't think he is recruiting well enough, you leave me no choice but to incessantly mock your dumb ass. Yeah I'm sure he won't sign a decent back this year...sigh. Typical reactionary recruiting fag. Doogman is definitely more your speed.

I just told you we did sign a decent back this year. That doesn't excuse overall poor recruiting results. Seriously, learn to read. Secondly, he hasn't produced superior results every year, Gaskin has. We've had Gaskin every year under this coachin staff. Gaskin is a rare talent. If you think that proves good coaching per se I seriously can't help you.

Poor recruiting results? Really? We have 3 backs that average 5+ ypc and you're complaining about results. Fuck outta here with that shit.

The recruiting results are fine. Cam Davis is one of the top backs in California. Dick Newton looks great. Hey maybe we get a shot at Kendall Milton, who knows. Are you unhappy with getting Ahmed? Not to mention Pleasant was a great find. I guess people hate McGrew but I think he'll get better when he puts some more muscle on. Who exactly did we miss on that is so tragic?

I’m pretty sure they tried putting weight on McGrew and he got slow.

NorwegianHusky said:

LuxrayBeats said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

Should we fire the running backs coach?

@NorwegianHusky tells me that running backs don't actually require any coaching and we should judge the coach based on how many 5* recruits they have in June.

You can't teach instincts like Gaskin's. Just look at Salvon. When Gaskin leaves you're gonna see how spoiled we have been with him. Or maybe you won't see it, because you're a retard.

Salvon will be a good running back. Or maybe you don't see it, because you're a retard.

Point is you wanted the RB coach fired in June because you didn't like his recruits. Well, the fact that we've had 2-3 good backs every year he's been here says differently. So does the head coach.

In short, the results say fuck you. Doogs hate results.

Learn to fucking read. I never said Salvon would be bad. I loved him as a recruit. I said he doesn't have the kind of instincts Gaskin has, and likely never will. The results on the field have been good, FOR NOW. However, the results in recruiting haven't been. That could lead to worse results in the future, but you don't like to look at more than one thing, because you're fucking stupid. Thankfully, we're getting Cameron Davis this year, and that might save us. But in between Davis and Ahmed, our RB recruiting has been like our WR recruiting under Pease. See how our WRs suck now outside of Fuller? Funny how that works. Now shut the fuck up.

When the running backs coach has done nothing but produce superior results year in year out and you want him fired in June because you don't think he is recruiting well enough, you leave me no choice but to incessantly mock your dumb ass. Yeah I'm sure he won't sign a decent back this year...sigh. Typical reactionary recruiting fag. Doogman is definitely more your speed.

I just told you we did sign a decent back this year. That doesn't excuse overall poor recruiting results. Seriously, learn to read. Secondly, he hasn't produced superior results every year, Gaskin has. We've had Gaskin every year under this coachin staff. Gaskin is a rare talent. If you think that proves good coaching per se I seriously can't help you.

Poor recruiting results? Really? We have 3 backs that average 5+ ypc and you're complaining about results. Fuck outta here with that shit.

The recruiting results are fine. Cam Davis is one of the top backs in California. Dick Newton looks great. Hey maybe we get a shot at Kendall Milton, who knows. Are you unhappy with getting Ahmed? Not to mention Pleasant was a great find. I guess people hate McGrew but I think he'll get better when he puts some more muscle on. Who exactly did we miss on that is so tragic?

I just said Cam Davis is fine. I also said I liked Ahmed, but he was a local recruit like Gaskin, not someone we really had to fight for. Dick Newt sucks. McGrew is okay, but literally no one wanted him. He's not a starter. Pleasant is a pleasant suprise, but we can't rely on getting one underrated recruit here and there and having no depth behind him. That doesn't lead to a sustainable running game. Only recruiting well consistently both RBs and OL, AND coaching them well on top of that will lead to a consistenly good running game. At least the OL should be good going forward. Forget Milton, that's not fucking happening.

The fact that Oregon State has a good running back tells me that you can virtually find one anywhere. But, I’d credit Socha more with RB development than Boner.

NorwegianHusky said:

LuxrayBeats said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

NorwegianHusky said:

PurpleJ said:

Should we fire the running backs coach?

@NorwegianHusky tells me that running backs don't actually require any coaching and we should judge the coach based on how many 5* recruits they have in June.

You can't teach instincts like Gaskin's. Just look at Salvon. When Gaskin leaves you're gonna see how spoiled we have been with him. Or maybe you won't see it, because you're a retard.

Salvon will be a good running back. Or maybe you don't see it, because you're a retard.

Point is you wanted the RB coach fired in June because you didn't like his recruits. Well, the fact that we've had 2-3 good backs every year he's been here says differently. So does the head coach.

In short, the results say fuck you. Doogs hate results.

Learn to fucking read. I never said Salvon would be bad. I loved him as a recruit. I said he doesn't have the kind of instincts Gaskin has, and likely never will. The results on the field have been good, FOR NOW. However, the results in recruiting haven't been. That could lead to worse results in the future, but you don't like to look at more than one thing, because you're fucking stupid. Thankfully, we're getting Cameron Davis this year, and that might save us. But in between Davis and Ahmed, our RB recruiting has been like our WR recruiting under Pease. See how our WRs suck now outside of Fuller? Funny how that works. Now shut the fuck up.

When the running backs coach has done nothing but produce superior results year in year out and you want him fired in June because you don't think he is recruiting well enough, you leave me no choice but to incessantly mock your dumb ass. Yeah I'm sure he won't sign a decent back this year...sigh. Typical reactionary recruiting fag. Doogman is definitely more your speed.

I just told you we did sign a decent back this year. That doesn't excuse overall poor recruiting results. Seriously, learn to read. Secondly, he hasn't produced superior results every year, Gaskin has. We've had Gaskin every year under this coachin staff. Gaskin is a rare talent. If you think that proves good coaching per se I seriously can't help you.

Poor recruiting results? Really? We have 3 backs that average 5+ ypc and you're complaining about results. Fuck outta here with that shit.

The recruiting results are fine. Cam Davis is one of the top backs in California. Dick Newton looks great. Hey maybe we get a shot at Kendall Milton, who knows. Are you unhappy with getting Ahmed? Not to mention Pleasant was a great find. I guess people hate McGrew but I think he'll get better when he puts some more muscle on. Who exactly did we miss on that is so tragic?

I just said Cam Davis is fine. I also said I liked Ahmed, but he was a local recruit like Gaskin, not someone we really had to fight for. Dick Newt sucks. McGrew is okay, but literally no one wanted him. He's not a starter. Pleasant is a pleasant suprise, but we can't rely on getting one underrated recruit here and there and having no depth behind him. That doesn't lead to a sustainable running game. Only recruiting well consistently both RBs and OL, AND coaching them well on top of that will lead to a consistenly good running game. At least the OL should be good going forward. Forget Milton, that's not fucking happening.

Don't worry, we won't let you back on the #MYFIG bandwagon.

Who the fuck is Dick Newt? A recruit? Didn't you hear Coach Pete say that recruiting is a JOKE???

We have 3 good running backs every year. Fuck your opinions on recruiting!

haie said:

Everyone sleeping on little Sean McGreW

Do you sit behind me? Guy frigging loves McGrew