Pete hates getting boat raced (hurts Yella Piss IMO)
Comments
-
Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
-
Hey Pete:
-
What's a pederast?YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
-
@CokeGreaterThanPepsi ?Mosster47 said:
What's a pederast?YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
-
Mosster47 said:
What's a pederast?YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
-
Utah in 2017 was 33-30.YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
-
DoogCourics said:
Utah in 2017 was 33-30.YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
-
YellowSnow said:DoogCourics said:
Utah in 2017 was 33-30.YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
-
Helps Trump
Imo -
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
-
DoogCourics said:
Utah in 2017 was 33-30.YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
He did say "over"....but still. -
If we take apart Cal, I think we come close to hanging 40+ in Autzen this year. New team. New attitude. The players will be stoked for this game.WilburHooksHands said:
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
If we take apart Cal, I think we come close to hanging 40+ in Autzen this year. New team. New attitude. The players will be stoked for this game.WilburHooksHands said:
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
-
Rather easily?oregonblitzkrieg said:
If we take apart Cal, I think we come close to hanging 40+ in Autzen this year. New team. New attitude. The players will be stoked for this game.WilburHooksHands said:
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
-
Nothing will cum easy, Washington will hang around in this game. But this prediction depends on a win vs Cal and a healthy team. The same team that played last Saturday. That's the team I want to see take the field for this game.doogville said:
Rather easily?oregonblitzkrieg said:
If we take apart Cal, I think we come close to hanging 40+ in Autzen this year. New team. New attitude. The players will be stoked for this game.WilburHooksHands said:
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
-
I think we'll need to get north of 35 to win the game. I don't see the Ducks getting past mid 30's.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nothing will cum easy, Washington will hang around in this game. But this prediction depends on a win vs Cal and a healthy team. The same team that played last Saturday. That's the team I want to see take the field for this game.doogville said:
Rather easily?oregonblitzkrieg said:
If we take apart Cal, I think we come close to hanging 40+ in Autzen this year. New team. New attitude. The players will be stoked for this game.WilburHooksHands said:
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
-
If I were you I'd be hoping to see a team that plays in the second half too.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nothing will cum easy, Washington will hang around in this game. But this prediction depends on a win vs Cal and a healthy team. The same team that played last Saturday. That's the team I want to see take the field for this game.doogville said:
Rather easily?oregonblitzkrieg said:
If we take apart Cal, I think we come close to hanging 40+ in Autzen this year. New team. New attitude. The players will be stoked for this game.WilburHooksHands said:
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
Just a thought.
I, too, hope the same team that played Stanford shows up for the UW game. -
It will be hard to get north of 35 points the way the duck's defense is stuffing the run. Stanford needed overtime to do it and it only happened because they have goliath receivers that can literally almost just stand there a catch a ball over the heads of our newbie midget cornerbacks. Cobra will need to play lights out.YellowSnow said:
I think we'll need to get north of 35 to win the game. I don't see the Ducks getting past mid 30's.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nothing will cum easy, Washington will hang around in this game. But this prediction depends on a win vs Cal and a healthy team. The same team that played last Saturday. That's the team I want to see take the field for this game.doogville said:
Rather easily?oregonblitzkrieg said:
If we take apart Cal, I think we come close to hanging 40+ in Autzen this year. New team. New attitude. The players will be stoked for this game.WilburHooksHands said:
This is why I love it when the Cougfarm/eQuook prediction threads have them dropping 40+ on usYellowSnow said:Remember when teams used to drop 50+ on us? Shout out to @puppylove_sugarsteel and the Lambo worship.
-
The defense under Peterman has been impressive and I can't believe more teams out west don't run a Nickel as their base package. People mistake it with a 4-2-5 but it really isn't.
As a Doog I would be worried about this long term with Peterman. The D isn't getting any better and he isn't letting go of the offense. It's year five, the QB and RB are four year starters, etc. The 2016 team had no chance of winning that Bama game and this year's team would get hammered even worse. There are zero big wins after five years.
Is this it? Is this the top of the mountain? I know, a freshman running back fumbled in Eugene and my college experience was way better than yours. Not an answer to a real question. -
I would say that's a fair point, but he said 30 to Furd.Fenderbender123 said:DoogCourics said:
Utah in 2017 was 33-30.YellowSnow said:Since the Utah game in 2015, we've only given up over 30 or more 3 times. 31 in the shitty 2015 bowl, 30 to Furd in 2017 and 35 to Pederast State.
He did say "over"....but still.
So either way he's wrong. But I still love Yella, even if Maff isn't for him. -
The defense has gotten better every year.
-
Hi there.Mosster47 said:The defense under Peterman has been impressive and I can't believe more teams out west don't run a Nickel as their base package. People mistake it with a 4-2-5 but it really isn't.
As a Doog I would be worried about this long term with Peterman. The D isn't getting any better and he isn't letting go of the offense. It's year five, the QB and RB are four year starters, etc. The 2016 team had no chance of winning that Bama game and this year's team would get hammered even worse. There are zero big wins after five years.
Is this it? Is this the top of the mountain? I know, a freshman running back fumbled in Eugene and my college experience was way better than yours. Not an answer to a real question.
Washington is recruiting on a completely different level than before, particularly on the lines and at QB.
We will be just fine going forward.
Thank you for your concern. -
Yep, I'm sure the defense won't have a chance to be better in the coming years with the massive influx of talent coming in from the 2017- 19 classes. JFC...the guys we have contributed on defense right now like BBK and Tevis Bartlett wouldn't even get and offer now from UDub post 2016. They are Boise level talent. By the time 2019 and 2020 roll around, we'll have elite athletes in the trenches the likes of which Oregon never had during the 2009- 14 run.Mosster47 said:The defense under Peterman has been impressive and I can't believe more teams out west don't run a Nickel as their base package. People mistake it with a 4-2-5 but it really isn't.
As a Doog I would be worried about this long term with Peterman. The D isn't getting any better and he isn't letting go of the offense. It's year five, the QB and RB are four year starters, etc. The 2016 team had no chance of winning that Bama game and this year's team would get hammered even worse. There are zero big wins after five years.
Is this it? Is this the top of the mountain? I know, a freshman running back fumbled in Eugene and my college experience was way better than yours. Not an answer to a real question. -
Mosster47 said:
The defense under Peterman has been impressive and I can't believe more teams out west don't run a Nickel as their base package. People mistake it with a 4-2-5 but it really isn't.
As a Doog I would be worried about this long term with Peterman. The D isn't getting any better and he isn't letting go of the offense. It's year five, the QB and RB are four year starters, etc. The 2016 team had no chance of winning that Bama game and this year's team would get hammered even worse. There are zero big wins after five years.
Is this it? Is this the top of the mountain? I know, a freshman running back fumbled in Eugene and my college experience was way better than yours. Not an answer to a real question.
Meanwhile, in the land of reality:
UW #4 in scoring defense, have only given up 1 passing touchdown (first drive of the season), and have only given up 1 play over 30 yards.
Even if the D isn't getting any better, it's still better than you could dream of.
-
Thanks for the Make-A-Wish perspective. Keep in touch!Mosster47 said:The defense under Peterman has been impressive and I can't believe more teams out west don't run a Nickel as their base package. People mistake it with a 4-2-5 but it really isn't.
As a Doog I would be worried about this long term with Peterman. The D isn't getting any better and he isn't letting go of the offense. It's year five, the QB and RB are four year starters, etc. The 2016 team had no chance of winning that Bama game and this year's team would get hammered even worse. There are zero big wins after five years.
Is this it? Is this the top of the mountain? I know, a freshman running back fumbled in Eugene and my college experience was way better than yours. Not an answer to a real question. -
If we had elite talent in the trenches we would have won a title or two by now. Especially with Marcus at the helm. 2009-2014 was legendary. It was the best thing to emerge from the conference since peak USC, but that wasn't the ceiling. Honestly there might not be a ceiling on what Oregon can accomplish. Smoke and mirrors high octane only gets you so far. It got us a playoff trophy, a Heisman and two title game appearances, but it wasn't enough to go the distance. We? learned from that experience and changed. We're playing Auburn, a home and home with tOSU and Georgia. You need to face teams like that head on and play tuff, smash-mouth, SEC ball to beat them. There's just no other way around it, so we've made the necessary changes. Welcome to the Cristobal era.YellowSnow said:
Yep, I'm sure the defense won't have a chance to be better in the coming years with the massive influx of talent coming in from the 2017- 19 classes. JFC...the guys we have contributed on defense right now like BBK and Tevis Bartlett wouldn't even get and offer now from UDub post 2016. They are Boise level talent. By the time 2019 and 2020 roll around, we'll have elite athletes in the trenches the likes of which Oregon never had during the 2009- 14 run.Mosster47 said:The defense under Peterman has been impressive and I can't believe more teams out west don't run a Nickel as their base package. People mistake it with a 4-2-5 but it really isn't.
As a Doog I would be worried about this long term with Peterman. The D isn't getting any better and he isn't letting go of the offense. It's year five, the QB and RB are four year starters, etc. The 2016 team had no chance of winning that Bama game and this year's team would get hammered even worse. There are zero big wins after five years.
Is this it? Is this the top of the mountain? I know, a freshman running back fumbled in Eugene and my college experience was way better than yours. Not an answer to a real question. -
May it last foreveroregonblitzkrieg said:
If we had elite talent in the trenches we would have won a title or two by now. Especially with Marcus at the helm. 2009-2014 was legendary. It was the best thing to emerge from the conference since peak USC, but that wasn't the ceiling. Honestly there might not be a ceiling on what Oregon can accomplish. Smoke and mirrors high octane only gets you so far. It got us a playoff trophy, a Heisman and two title game appearances, but it wasn't enough to go the distance. We? learned from that experience and changed. We're playing Auburn, a home and home with tOSU and Georgia. You need to face teams like that head on and play tuff, smash-mouth, SEC ball to beat them. There's just no other way around it, so we've made the necessary changes. Welcome to the Cristobal era. -
Mosster has made an art form out of quietly being the dumbest motherfucker on this board
-
Quietly? I feel like he’s pretty overt about it.WilburHooksHands said:Mosster has made an art form out of quietly being the dumbest motherfucker on this board
-
I don't think this is the top of the mountain for Pete. You can say the QB and RB are four year starters so that's as good as it gets, but as others have pointed out, the talent can get (is getting?) better, particularly at QB and on the lines.
A top shelf QB can make a huge difference. It would also be nice if Bonerpopper recruited some pro RBs.
