Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Official game day thread Kavanaugh edition
Comments
-
who?Sledog said:
He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.AZDuck said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASledog said:
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Be a better poasterAZDuck said:
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
"The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."
Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me. -
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.SFGbob said: -
And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.SFGbob said: -
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friendsTurdBuffer said:
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.SFGbob said: -
fuck off
-
Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?AZDuck said:
Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friendsTurdBuffer said:
And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.SFGbob said:
The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years. -
The biggest line of unbelievable bullshit I've heard in this whole drama is this: "I thought he was going to kill me."
Bull. Fucking. Shit.
This is what happens when melodrama supplants facts. -
Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.SFGbob said:
