Official game day thread Kavanaugh edition

AZDuck

TurdBuffer said:

AZDuck said:

TurdBuffer said:

SFGbob said:

Dude61 said:

SFGbob said:

Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.

I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.

And let's all ride the hype train and apply 2018 standards to events in 1982.

Okay, so if we stipulate that everything in Blasey-Ford's account is correct, it would have most definitely not been okay in my Texas high school (1984-1988) - at least not in my circle of friends

Who said it's okay? Can we stop asserting and attributing falsehoods?

The issue is whether such conduct at 17 years old, while ostensibly drunk, should prevent a SC seat 36 years later if the guy is otherwise qualified and has redeemed himself as an adult and federal judge for 30 years.

See... that's where all this gets interesting. There's the other accounts, his buddy's books, his buddy's girlfriend, the nominee's flat denials.

And oh by the way, there's some reasonably credible lying to Congress shit that happened pretty recently that the media doesn't care about but I do.

The Supreme Court is a big deal. I'm sure there's someone on that Federalist Society list the President has without Kavanaugh's baggage (Starr investigation, Bush AG *and* now this rapey stuff).

If I were a Repub I would drop this dude and go get one of them before it's too late. He can keep setting bad precedent at the DC circuit.

Pitchfork51

I want them to push him through no matter what

Need to see the meltdown

2001400ex

Pitchfork51 said:

I want them to push him through no matter what

Need to see the meltdown

The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTH

TierbsHsotBoobs

Pitchfork51 said:

I want them to push him through no matter what

Need to see the meltdown

Burning the country down to own the libs is still all you've got.

Thanks Comrade

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Dude61 said:

SFGbob said:

Does this one brief encounter really rise to the level of sexual abuse?

There is no corroborating evidence the encounter happened.

I know but assuming it was true. Is it really abuse? If women are this sensitive then we seriously need to rethink our current system.

And comments like that. Are exactly what will take kavanaugh down.

You're right, my comments here have probably doomed him.

Given you are parroting that from someone else.. Who people actually listen to. But keep with the "women just need to brush it off" talk. That'll win people over.

Pretty obvious response to the bullshit you're peddling Hondo. Great minds think alike

Sledog

2001400ex said:

Pitchfork51 said:

I want them to push him through no matter what

Need to see the meltdown

The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTH

Because the left lives in fear of a constitutional supreme court.

2001400ex

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Pitchfork51 said:

I want them to push him through no matter what

Need to see the meltdown

The meltdown if he isn't confirmed will be way worse than anything from the Trump victory. HTH

Because the left lives in fear of a constitutional supreme court.

Did you read what I wrote? Clearly not.

AZDuck

Dude, this guy's demeanor is horrible. Did anyone even prep him to be a witness? He reminds me of a rookie CID agent that wanted to fight the defense attorney and almost single-handedly lost a rape case I prosecuted.

Sledog

AZDuck said:

Sledog said:

AZDuck said:

Sledog said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

AZDuck said:

https://twitter.com/amyklobuchar/status/1045350313262284800

Be a better poaster

Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

you clearly know nothing about polygraphs

The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.

Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."

Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.

He only asked two. They were about the written story line prepared while the examiner was not in the room. It was heavily changed, scribbled and had parts inserted and redacted.

"The interviewer asked Ford whether “any part” of her statement was false or whether she made up any detail included in her initial report."

Funny experts think this isn't a valid poly. But please enlighten me.

who?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/experts-doubt-claim-of-truthful-polygraph-result-from-kavanaugh-accuser

https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/09/report-ford-polygraph-expert-says-victims-like-ford-you-believe-them-dont-ask-specific-questions/

Doogles

Pitchfork51 said:

As a man who is in many compromising sexual situations...I always support the guy with my mouth.