Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This is what shit strength and conditioning will do to you
HillsboroDuck
Member Posts: 9,186
3rd quarter team.
Comments
-
Obviously the play up front wasn't an issue. Good argument though.
-
Because conditioning only applies to the lines?Mosster47 said:Obviously the play up front wasn't an issue. Good argument though.
-
Mental conditioning wasn’t good. We? need to re-learn how to win
-
Yep. The 22 man is underclassmen and Sling holdovers that don't know how to kill the bunny yet.AZDuck said:Mental conditioning wasn’t good. We? need to re-learn how to win
-
Or tell your young RBs no matter what two hands on the ball. Even if they stop you short we have another play to run the clock to under 20 seconds.
-
this is what happens when ur team culture involves oiling eachother up at halftime for shirtless muscule picsDoogles said:Or tell your young RBs no matter what two hands on the ball. Even if they stop you short we have another play to run the clock to under 20 seconds.
-
Oregon's O line is garbage
-
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development. -
Luckily they've solved the S&C issue by hiring a skinny-fat guy with a hipster mustache who is essentially a meme at this point.
-
Stanford missed the plane to the game. When they showed up and Oregon's bag of tricks were empty it was overcreepycoug said:
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development.
Hubert is good but lots of 7-5 teams have big armed quarterbacks
ASU and UW had real power running games last night. Old fashioned slug fest
Oregon is Oregon
The big take away is that Stanford is average to poor on defense this year.
But as a wise man once said, Costello to Hyphen Name receiver can beat anyone -
Eh, that's a pretty Doogie take, even for you.RaceBannon said:
Stanford missed the plane to the game. When they showed up and Oregon's bag of tricks were empty it was overcreepycoug said:
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development.
Hubert is good but lots of 7-5 teams have big armed quarterbacks
ASU and UW had real power running games last night. Old fashioned slug fest
Oregon is Oregon
The big take away is that Stanford is average to poor on defense this year.
But as a wise man once said, Costello to Hyphen Name receiver can beat anyone
Herbert was sharp. Not just big arm, but sharp, he made a lot of great throws. Imagine what that that kid could do if he had even one of Stanford's hyphenated name big Receivers. Very little by way of bag of tricks from the Oregon offense. Have no idea what you're talking about there. I thinkall but two or three of the running plays for the entire game went straight between the tackles. There was very little RPO either. And I counted one jet sweep. And the D played pretty well, doing a pretty solid job of containing Love. That motherfucker ate you? up less than a year ago on a Very flat tire, and the husky defense is considerably better than Oregon's. Oregon's frontline couldn't stop any running attack last year.
No question that Oregon just didn't have an answer for Stanford's big receiver passing game. That, and some bad breaks, and a few mental breakdowns, is the tale of the tape. -
Jesus quook
-
-
Scoreboard
-
I am out of one word responses. You win.RaceBannon said:Scoreboard
-
I only watched the first half and while the scoreboard indicates that Herbert fucked up in the second half, in the 30 minutes I watched he looked like a top 10 draft pick. Duck fans better hope he pulls a Barkley and mistakenly returns for his senior year, because that team isn’t shit without him.
-
Stanford had a brutal defensive gameplan. You don't let Herbert sit back there with 6 seconds to throw and expect to stop him. Jesus the guy was 25/27 before OT. That's on Stanford's DC. I'm not gonna doog. Oregon looked markedly improved from the Taggert version. I hope Lake has some sort of pressure plan or Herbert will dink us to death. He won't be 25/27 but will still move the chains.creepycoug said:
Eh, that's a pretty Doogie take, even for you.RaceBannon said:
Stanford missed the plane to the game. When they showed up and Oregon's bag of tricks were empty it was overcreepycoug said:
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development.
Hubert is good but lots of 7-5 teams have big armed quarterbacks
ASU and UW had real power running games last night. Old fashioned slug fest
Oregon is Oregon
The big take away is that Stanford is average to poor on defense this year.
But as a wise man once said, Costello to Hyphen Name receiver can beat anyone
Herbert was sharp. Not just big arm, but sharp, he made a lot of great throws. Imagine what that that kid could do if he had even one of Stanford's hyphenated name big Receivers. Very little by way of bag of tricks from the Oregon offense. Have no idea what you're talking about there. I thinkall but two or three of the running plays for the entire game went straight between the tackles. There was very little RPO either. And I counted one jet sweep. And the D played pretty well, doing a pretty solid job of containing Love. That motherfucker ate you? up less than a year ago on a Very flat tire, and the husky defense is considerably better than Oregon's. Oregon's frontline couldn't stop any running attack last year.
No question that Oregon just didn't have an answer for Stanford's big receiver passing game. That, and some bad breaks, and a few mental breakdowns, is the tale of the tape. -
I think Stanford assumed, rationally, that they could get pressure on him without sending in extra bodies. The duck O line may be improved; or it's the doog take that Stanford is straight shit this year. We shall see. Either way, you know the rest.
-
You're struggling worse than insincere dawg in a Tug Tavern thread.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
-
Watch the game. STFU until you do.RaceBannon said:
Stanford missed the plane to the game. When they showed up and Oregon's bag of tricks were empty it was overcreepycoug said:
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development.
Hubert is good but lots of 7-5 teams have big armed quarterbacks
ASU and UW had real power running games last night. Old fashioned slug fest
Oregon is Oregon
The big take away is that Stanford is average to poor on defense this year.
But as a wise man once said, Costello to Hyphen Name receiver can beat anyone
TIA. -
Unless Washington is losing every week by 25 points, your as big a fucking doog as anyone.RaceBannon said:
Stanford missed the plane to the game. When they showed up and Oregon's bag of tricks were empty it was overcreepycoug said:
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development.
Hubert is good but lots of 7-5 teams have big armed quarterbacks
ASU and UW had real power running games last night. Old fashioned slug fest
Oregon is Oregon
The big take away is that Stanford is average to poor on defense this year.
But as a wise man once said, Costello to Hyphen Name receiver can beat anyone
-
I didn't know creep was a UO alum.
-
Is this news?MikeSeaver said:
Unless Washington is losing every week by 25 points, your as big a fucking doog as anyone.RaceBannon said:
Stanford missed the plane to the game. When they showed up and Oregon's bag of tricks were empty it was overcreepycoug said:
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development.
Hubert is good but lots of 7-5 teams have big armed quarterbacks
ASU and UW had real power running games last night. Old fashioned slug fest
Oregon is Oregon
The big take away is that Stanford is average to poor on defense this year.
But as a wise man once said, Costello to Hyphen Name receiver can beat anyone -
He always does.creepycoug said:
I am out of one word responses. You win.RaceBannon said:Scoreboard
-
You’ll have to remember, I’ve only known you since Washington sucked.RaceBannon said:
Is this news?MikeSeaver said:
Unless Washington is losing every week by 25 points, your as big a fucking doog as anyone.RaceBannon said:
Stanford missed the plane to the game. When they showed up and Oregon's bag of tricks were empty it was overcreepycoug said:
About 15 or 20 carries, close to 6 yards a pop, and almost exclusively handoffs that went between the tackles, would suggest that they may be north of garbage. That, and Herbert wasn't under a lot of duress.RaceBannon said:Oregon's O line is garbage
Mental break down. Which is worse. There were two or three moments in the second half at which Oregon could have iced the game. Instead, those were pivotal turnarounds.
I thought they were going to get their asses kicked last night. If they were able to clean up some of the bullshit, they might be decent this year.
They are still missing some pieces. In particular, the lack of at least one big receiver who can go up and fight for the ball, will catch up to them. That is the where the game has gone. But still, the offense is a lot less trickeration, misdirection, getting athletes in space, etc trademark Duck high-octane shit, and a lot more straight at you.
This may not be your daddy's Stanford Dline , but we don't really know yet do we?
.in any event, my cane boy Mario clearly intends to have his team reflect a more Jimmy Johnson/Nick Saban approach to the game.
Meanwhile, @haie is running academia smack in another thread. Not a good development.
Hubert is good but lots of 7-5 teams have big armed quarterbacks
ASU and UW had real power running games last night. Old fashioned slug fest
Oregon is Oregon
The big take away is that Stanford is average to poor on defense this year.
But as a wise man once said, Costello to Hyphen Name receiver can beat anyone
I thought, wrongly, you had some standards.
That was my fault. -
I mean my standards wouldn't allow me to pretend Cristobal doesn't suck but still
-
I’m talking about Washington, but you knew that.RaceBannon said:I mean my standards wouldn't allow me to pretend Cristobal doesn't suck but still
Oregon loses to Stanford. That was a bad Stanford team.
Washingron beats ASU, that was a GOOD Arizona State team.
-
I'm an expert so my opinion is validMikeSeaver said:
I’m talking about Washington, but you knew that.RaceBannon said:I mean my standards wouldn't allow me to pretend Cristobal doesn't suck but still
Oregon loses to Stanford. That was a bad Stanford team.
Washingron beats ASU, that was a GOOD Arizona State team.
Stanford is worse than I thought
ASU will beat Oregon -
Sorry, but your retarded call in 2014 for UCLA and Mora to win the conference calls your credibility into question.RaceBannon said:
I'm an expert so my opinion is validMikeSeaver said:
I’m talking about Washington, but you knew that.RaceBannon said:I mean my standards wouldn't allow me to pretend Cristobal doesn't suck but still
Oregon loses to Stanford. That was a bad Stanford team.
Washingron beats ASU, that was a GOOD Arizona State team.
Stanford is worse than I thought
ASU will beat Oregon -
That’s fine, I’m still showing up here around January with some hilarious memes about Washington still never winning anything.RaceBannon said:
I'm an expert so my opinion is validMikeSeaver said:
I’m talking about Washington, but you knew that.RaceBannon said:I mean my standards wouldn't allow me to pretend Cristobal doesn't suck but still
Oregon loses to Stanford. That was a bad Stanford team.
Washingron beats ASU, that was a GOOD Arizona State team.
Stanford is worse than I thought
ASU will beat Oregon
