Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Online Genius Figures Out 3 Things Experts "On the Inside" Could Not: #2 Will Bring You to Tears!
Dennis_DeYoung
Member Posts: 14,754
1. Our problem is the offense. Pete is in charge of it. I believe that when Jake was healthy, we had Ross and Pettis and (most importantly) Tedford - we were good. At all other times it's sucked. It sucked at the end of Pete's tenure at Boise and it's sucked here constantly outside of that 6 game window to start '16.
2. Pete is a great CEO. He is amazing at holding people to high standards and getting excellent performance from others around him. He is a good hearted, generous leader who is loyal and both commands and deserves respect. However, everything he's directly involved in he's proven himself to be a stubborn, incompetent control freak. Why are we playing Jake? Why don't we have a spring game? Why can't we stop this faggy madness on offense? Why can't we stop this faggy madness with the injury reporting? Why do we hire sycophantic offensive personnel and old white guys who can't recruit? Why run this horrible offense? WHY THE FUCK DO WE PLAY JAKE BROWNING?
Pete so intensely curates this program, B4L, OKG, all the details every day, everything measured, improved and optimized... and then he takes this fine wine he's crafted over years and dumps a Carnation Instant Breakfast in it before he serves it to prove a point.
3. Run the fucking ball.
2. Pete is a great CEO. He is amazing at holding people to high standards and getting excellent performance from others around him. He is a good hearted, generous leader who is loyal and both commands and deserves respect. However, everything he's directly involved in he's proven himself to be a stubborn, incompetent control freak. Why are we playing Jake? Why don't we have a spring game? Why can't we stop this faggy madness on offense? Why can't we stop this faggy madness with the injury reporting? Why do we hire sycophantic offensive personnel and old white guys who can't recruit? Why run this horrible offense? WHY THE FUCK DO WE PLAY JAKE BROWNING?
Pete so intensely curates this program, B4L, OKG, all the details every day, everything measured, improved and optimized... and then he takes this fine wine he's crafted over years and dumps a Carnation Instant Breakfast in it before he serves it to prove a point.
3. Run the fucking ball.
Comments
-
6 game window to start '16:
Rutgers
Idaho
Portland State
Arizona
Stanford with both of its starting CBs injured and out
Oregon with its worst statistical defense since 1974 -
We could have lined up in power sets all day yesterday and that team wouldn't have stopped us.
-
The gameplan for Stanford was amazing. Best gameplan we've had in years.Gladstone said:6 game window to start '16:
Rutgers
Idaho
Portland State
Arizona
Stanford with both of its starting CBs injured and out
Oregon with its worst statistical defense since 1974 -
AND LEARN HOW TO RUN A FUCKING SCREEN PLAY FUCK
-
I actually don't agree with this. When we had Dissly, Shelton, and Eldenkamp in 2016 we could. And t also helped having Ross and Pettis.PurpleJ said:We could have lined up in power sets all day yesterday and that team wouldn't have stopped us.
Now we have young TE's who aren't great blockers and a ravaged OL that isn't very good. -
It's almost as if playing young players means you have to put up with the ups and downs of their development in real time … shocking.
Go back to 2014 and the DBs that we were throwing out there were all young guys with Sidney and Budda true freshman … we played Nate Dogg Jr out there … it was a mess at times (go back and watch the UCLA game and a long TD that they had where the WR was open by 30 yards because of assignment errors). Many of those DBs turned out to be part of the best DB grouping that we've ever had at this school.
I suspect that our OL will get better throughout the year.
For better or worse, many of our more difficult games are at the start of the season this year … baptism by fire. -
They are good at run blocking. Pass blocking not so much. If we ever call a pass play, it should be a 3 step drop.RoadDawg55 said:
I actually don't agree with this. When we had Dissly, Shelton, and Eldenkamp in 2016 we could. And t also helped having Ross and Pettis.PurpleJ said:We could have lined up in power sets all day yesterday and that team wouldn't have stopped us.
Now we have young TE's who aren't great blockers and a ravaged OL that isn't very good.
Regardless, Utah wouldn't have stopped us if we kept running it down their throat. You crazy. -
Ok ... so we run 3 step drops and the initial read isn't there ... then what happens? Have you caught onto the fact that we have a QB that doesn't like to take hits and panics at a moment's notice? He also has a noodle arm and doesn't have the confidence to fit throws into tight windows (which are often required for 3 step drops)?PurpleJ said:
They are good at run blocking. Pass blocking not so much. If we ever call a pass play, it should be a 3 step drop.RoadDawg55 said:
I actually don't agree with this. When we had Dissly, Shelton, and Eldenkamp in 2016 we could. And t also helped having Ross and Pettis.PurpleJ said:We could have lined up in power sets all day yesterday and that team wouldn't have stopped us.
Now we have young TE's who aren't great blockers and a ravaged OL that isn't very good.
Regardless, Utah wouldn't have stopped us if we kept running it down their throat. You crazy.
That's a recipe for disaster IMO.
-
@Tequilla down vote means I'm right
-
