Genuine Question for the Quooks

DoogCourics said:

So the Quook King of all Quooks, Justin Hopkins, said something yesterday on the radio during his Oregon preview that legitimately caused me to question if I heard correctly.

He stated that the Ducks will have the best front 7 in the Pac-12. I know Jelks and Scott are really good players, as well as Dye.

But while I admittedly didn't watch enough of Oregon to know, I can't name another player in that front 7.

Is this Koolaid something that all Quooks are drinking right now? Genuinely curious.

TIA

He's full of it. He's selling the brand because it's in his best interest.

Mosster47 said:

Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.

As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.

Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.

I’m embarrassed for you.

I’ll buy the Oregon run. Always have. But this drivel is a new low, even for you.

Ever thought of rehab? Consider this an intervention. At least have your eyes checked. Get your cataracts removed.

dtd said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.

You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.

From 94 to 03 Oregon won 5, UW won 4. Oregon hosted 5, UW hosted 4.

From 94 to 03 Oregon finished above UW in the conference 4 times. UW finished above Oregon in the conference 4 times. And they tied two times.

There's no real reasonable argument for Oregon passing UW before 2001, but even then UW smashed them the next two years. Realistically Oregon passed UW in 2004. So 12 years. Call it 15 if you prefer I'm good with.

Major lol at 25.

Flash in the pan.

Certainly not saying that. Oregon was better than UW for quite awhile and was an incredible program under Chip and Chip residuals. Not sure you'll be getting back to that level anytime soon, very sure we won't be dropping back to our 00's level anytime soon.

oregonblitzkrieg said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.

As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.

Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.

UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.

Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.

Get all the screenshots you need.

No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.

Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.

Next.

Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.

I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.

I'm not worried.

I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.

He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.

We've seen him without Vea. Fact.

He's looked great without Vea. Fact.

Quooks hate facts. Fact.

9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.

25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.

Fuck.

Clearly....

Quantity doesn't mean Quality fucktard … congrats on getting more warm bodies to replace the shitty ones that couldn't #FillTheSleeves

Even if I was to believe that the talent being recruited was a wash (which it isn't … UW is getting better players) … there's such a massive gap between what you get with Pete and his staff vs Cristobal and his staff.

Can't wait to watch the Quooks get their shit pushed in this year.

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Tequilla said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

dnc said:

Mosster47 said:

Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.

As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.

Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.

UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.

Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.

Get all the screenshots you need.

No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.

Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.

Next.

Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.

I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.

I'm not worried.

I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.

He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.

We've seen him without Vea. Fact.

He's looked great without Vea. Fact.

Quooks hate facts. Fact.

9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.

25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.

Fuck.

Clearly....

Quantity doesn't mean Quality fucktard … congrats on getting more warm bodies to replace the shitty ones that couldn't #FillTheSleeves

Even if I was to believe that the talent being recruited was a wash (which it isn't … UW is getting better players) … there's such a massive gap between what you get with Pete and his staff vs Cristobal and his staff.

Can't wait to watch the Quooks get their shit pushed in this year.

You sound somewhat angry. With a little jealousy mixed in. This is how blueblood programs operate. Even during down years, they still out-recruit stand-in upstarts, even ones that make the make the playoffs and lose in the first round.

I know it's important that SC respects you guys. What you can't bring yourselves to admit is that it's important that Oregon respects you too. You're USC's favorite bitch. That will never change. You've been Oregon's favorite bitch for most of this decade and the last too. You can't sweep that under the rug. SC respects UW. Oregon doesn't and never will. How can we respect a program that lost 12 straight games to us?

Why would I be angry?

There are few recruits that Oregon has that UW REALLY wanted … in fact when we went after one of your existing verbals it took about 3 seconds for him to essentially change his mind and decide to go to UW.

Blueblood programs don't have 3 coaches in 3 years … that's not an opinion … that's fact. Blueblood programs don't have a coach leave after 1 year and take over the sloppy seconds of Jimbo. The only attribute about the Oregon program that is blueblood at all is Uncle Phil … and the reality is that Uncle Phil turned 80 this year and we'll see what Oregon has to separate itself in the future because let's be real, there's a MASSIVE difference between Eugene and Seattle and there's a MASSIVE difference between UW and Oregon from an academics standpoint.

Why would anybody associated with UW want Oregon's respect? Likewise, why would we care whether Wazzu respects us? You sound like you still need big brother to acknowledge that you did good. The reality is that throughout your run from 1994 until 2014, the only real high water mark for the program came under Chip. Most of Belotti's teams were above average but nothing special. Once Chip left everything essentially went back to shit. So congrats for Chip ... good luck finding another version of him.

haie said:

I support @flatulence

Of course you do. He's a duck with a coog mentality.

The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.

oregonblitzkrieg said:

The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.

dnc said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.

haie said:

By the way what's with the blue blood shit between quooks and doogs? I could care less whether UW is a blue blood or not. They're not.

It almost makes winning real trophies such as the 91 national championship that much more satisfying in the midst of starving fans of actual blue bloods.

“IM GLAD WE UNLY HAVE ONE CHAMPIONSHIP, YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!”