Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Genuine Question for the Quooks

13

Comments

  • Options
    flatusflatus Member Posts: 877
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment First Anniversary
    Standard Supporter


    12 straight wins, yes, but Oregon never thoroughly demoralized Washington in that stretch the way UW did to slingblade in that game.

    Stanford obliterated Washington in every facet of the game in Seattle when they were fown in ways I've only dreamed of beating (off) Washington. Complete pwning. UW "guys" quitting by 13:23 in the 3rd. Kim Grinolds gargling Fetters' cum later that night. Wait, where was I going with this?

    Oh yeah. The 70-21 has been branded into the flesh of any duck who considered Autzen a special place. It'll never be the same. Not to me.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited August 2018
    flatus said:


    12 straight wins, yes, but Oregon never thoroughly demoralized Washington in that stretch the way UW did to slingblade in that game.

    Stanford obliterated Washington in every facet of the game in Seattle when they were fown in ways I've only dreamed of beating (off) Washington. Complete pwning. UW "guys" quitting by 13:23 in the 3rd. Kim Grinolds gargling Fetters' cum later that night. Wait, where was I going with this?

    Oh yeah. The 70-21 has been branded into the flesh of any duck who considered Autzen a special place. It'll never be the same. Not to me.
    Sure, dumbass. Nearly every game was a lopsided plungering. 12 straight years of shame that will never be erased.

    Stop acting like a faggot, man up, be a real duck and get ready for another playoff run in the next year or 3, or fuck off.
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.

    As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.

    Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.

    UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.

    Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.

    Get all the screenshots you need.
    No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.
    Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.

    Next.
    Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.

    I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.

    I'm not worried.
    I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.

    He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.

    We've seen him without Vea. Fact.

    He's looked great without Vea. Fact.

    Quooks hate facts. Fact.
    9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.
    25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.

    Fuck.

    Clearly....


    Quantity doesn't mean Quality fucktard … congrats on getting more warm bodies to replace the shitty ones that couldn't #FillTheSleeves

    Even if I was to believe that the talent being recruited was a wash (which it isn't … UW is getting better players) … there's such a massive gap between what you get with Pete and his staff vs Cristobal and his staff.

    Can't wait to watch the Quooks get their shit pushed in this year.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited August 2018
    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.

    As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.

    Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.

    UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.

    Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.

    Get all the screenshots you need.
    No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.
    Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.

    Next.
    Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.

    I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.

    I'm not worried.
    I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.

    He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.

    We've seen him without Vea. Fact.

    He's looked great without Vea. Fact.

    Quooks hate facts. Fact.
    9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.
    25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.

    Fuck.

    Clearly....


    Quantity doesn't mean Quality fucktard … congrats on getting more warm bodies to replace the shitty ones that couldn't #FillTheSleeves

    Even if I was to believe that the talent being recruited was a wash (which it isn't … UW is getting better players) … there's such a massive gap between what you get with Pete and his staff vs Cristobal and his staff.

    Can't wait to watch the Quooks get their shit pushed in this year.
    You sound somewhat angry. With a little jealousy mixed in. This is how blueblood programs operate. Even during down years, they still out-recruit stand-in upstarts, even ones that make the make the playoffs and lose in the first round.

    I know it's important that SC respects you guys. What you can't bring yourselves to admit is that it's important that Oregon respects you too. You're USC's favorite bitch. That will never change. You've been Oregon's favorite bitch for most of this decade and the last too. You can't sweep that under the rug. SC respects UW. Oregon doesn't and never will. How can we respect a program that lost 12 straight games to us?
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.

    As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.

    Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.

    UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.

    Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.

    Get all the screenshots you need.
    No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.
    Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.

    Next.
    Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.

    I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.

    I'm not worried.
    I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.

    He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.

    We've seen him without Vea. Fact.

    He's looked great without Vea. Fact.

    Quooks hate facts. Fact.
    9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.
    25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.

    Fuck.

    Clearly....


    Quantity doesn't mean Quality fucktard … congrats on getting more warm bodies to replace the shitty ones that couldn't #FillTheSleeves

    Even if I was to believe that the talent being recruited was a wash (which it isn't … UW is getting better players) … there's such a massive gap between what you get with Pete and his staff vs Cristobal and his staff.

    Can't wait to watch the Quooks get their shit pushed in this year.
    You sound somewhat angry. With a little jealousy mixed in. This is how blueblood programs operate. Even during down years, they still out-recruit stand-in upstarts, even ones that make the make the playoffs and lose in the first round.

    I know it's important that SC respects you guys. What you can't bring yourselves to admit is that it's important that Oregon respects you too. You're USC's favorite bitch. That will never change. You've been Oregon's favorite bitch for most of this decade and the last too. You can't sweep that under the rug. SC respects UW. Oregon doesn't and never will. How can we respect a program that lost 12 straight games to us?
    Why would I be angry?

    There are few recruits that Oregon has that UW REALLY wanted … in fact when we went after one of your existing verbals it took about 3 seconds for him to essentially change his mind and decide to go to UW.

    Blueblood programs don't have 3 coaches in 3 years … that's not an opinion … that's fact. Blueblood programs don't have a coach leave after 1 year and take over the sloppy seconds of Jimbo. The only attribute about the Oregon program that is blueblood at all is Uncle Phil … and the reality is that Uncle Phil turned 80 this year and we'll see what Oregon has to separate itself in the future because let's be real, there's a MASSIVE difference between Eugene and Seattle and there's a MASSIVE difference between UW and Oregon from an academics standpoint.

    Why would anybody associated with UW want Oregon's respect? Likewise, why would we care whether Wazzu respects us? You sound like you still need big brother to acknowledge that you did good. The reality is that throughout your run from 1994 until 2014, the only real high water mark for the program came under Chip. Most of Belotti's teams were above average but nothing special. Once Chip left everything essentially went back to shit. So congrats for Chip ... good luck finding another version of him.
  • Options
    uw2010uw2010 Member Posts: 940
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Name Dropper
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,465
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,465
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.

    As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.

    Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.

    UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.

    Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.

    Get all the screenshots you need.
    No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.
    Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.

    Next.
    Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.

    I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.

    I'm not worried.
    I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.

    He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.

    We've seen him without Vea. Fact.

    He's looked great without Vea. Fact.

    Quooks hate facts. Fact.
    9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.
    25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.

    Fuck.

    Clearly....


    Quantity doesn't mean Quality fucktard … congrats on getting more warm bodies to replace the shitty ones that couldn't #FillTheSleeves

    Even if I was to believe that the talent being recruited was a wash (which it isn't … UW is getting better players) … there's such a massive gap between what you get with Pete and his staff vs Cristobal and his staff.

    Can't wait to watch the Quooks get their shit pushed in this year.
    You sound somewhat angry. With a little jealousy mixed in. This is how blueblood programs operate. Even during down years, they still out-recruit stand-in upstarts, even ones that make the make the playoffs and lose in the first round.

    I know it's important that SC respects you guys. What you can't bring yourselves to admit is that it's important that Oregon respects you too. You're USC's favorite bitch. That will never change. You've been Oregon's favorite bitch for most of this decade and the last too. You can't sweep that under the rug. SC respects UW. Oregon doesn't and never will. How can we respect a program that lost 12 straight games to us?
    Pretty much every die-hard quook was saying you guys didn't recruit shit during the Helfrich years, which coming off of a Natty appearance is really damning of your whole "Oregon's a blue blood" troll non-troll quookism.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    haie said:

    I support @flatulence

    Of course you do. He's a duck with a coog mentality.
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,465
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    By the way what's with the blue blood shit between quooks and doogs? I could care less whether UW is a blue blood or not. They're not.

    It almost makes winning real trophies such as the 91 national championship that much more satisfying in the midst of starving fans of actual blue bloods.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.



  • Options
    BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker

    The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.

    20%. But still
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    dnc said:

    The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.




  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Baseman said:

    The doog heyday of the early 90's was a long time ago. Don James is gone, the grunge pussies are all dead and so is the era of voted 'championships.' Still waiting for that matchup with the '91 Canes. Meanwhile Oregon has played in 10% of CFB's real national championship games, won a playoff and several big time bowels. Stop living in the past.

    20%. But still
    Quook POTW
  • Options
    Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited August 2018
    haie said:

    By the way what's with the blue blood shit between quooks and doogs? I could care less whether UW is a blue blood or not. They're not.

    It almost makes winning real trophies such as the 91 national championship that much more satisfying in the midst of starving fans of actual blue bloods.

    Agreed. UW has half an NC and Oregon has zero. That means they combine to have basically nothing.
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment

    haie said:

    I support @flatulence

    Of course you do. He's a duck with a coog mentality.
    Whoa whoa... Pick on a team that you don’t steal coaches from every year.


    Kreist.
  • Options
    MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 4,405
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    haie said:

    By the way what's with the blue blood shit between quooks and doogs? I could care less whether UW is a blue blood or not. They're not.

    It almost makes winning real trophies such as the 91 national championship that much more satisfying in the midst of starving fans of actual blue bloods.

    “IM GLAD WE UNLY HAVE ONE CHAMPIONSHIP, YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!”

  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,465
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    By the way what's with the blue blood shit between quooks and doogs? I could care less whether UW is a blue blood or not. They're not.

    It almost makes winning real trophies such as the 91 national championship that much more satisfying in the midst of starving fans of actual blue bloods.

    “IM GLAD WE UNLY HAVE ONE CHAMPIONSHIP, YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!”

    Mike's upset, as usual.
Sign In or Register to comment.