Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What's the deal with Gaines?
Comments
-
I think much like a lot of our "talent" our receivers will be good against lesser talent but inadequate against the big boys. I'm hoping that at the end of the year getting Hunter back and maybe being able to burn those four games for a redshirt freshmen will give us the talent depth needed in the Pac championship and our bowel game.dnc said:
I know it's going to be an unpopular take but hear me out.Gladstone said:
Right now Aaron Fuller is our best pass catcher. I like Fuller and think he's underrated here but he's best suited as a #3, at best.
Bryant would be by far our best threat in the passing game, at least out of the gate. We have no BTEs behind him who can stretch the defense unless Culp is far more ready than I expect.
I think the people behind and around Gaines are more ready to fill in for him than the people and around behind Bryant.
I'm not saying for the whole season but for the Auburn game, which basically is the season.
I think our receiving core will be very good by the end of the year but like Auburn's OL I don't think they'll be good out of the gate. For this game I think we can handle Auburn's OL without Gaines. I think Bryant would be a bigger difference maker. -
Appreciate youMeek said:he lost 20lbs and he's home sick.
i believe he will start week 1....
for Bama -
Fuck you fat ass. Nobody cares what you think. You're a WSU fan on a UW board.AuburnFan said: -
At this point in his career they're going to hold him out if he gets a paper cut. Not worried about him. He'll be ready to go. It's good that some other guys behind him are getting more reps in practice. -
You explained your rationale well, but I still think it is wrong.dnc said:
I know it's going to be an unpopular take but hear me out.Gladstone said:
Right now Aaron Fuller is our best pass catcher. I like Fuller and think he's underrated here but he's best suited as a #3, at best.
Bryant would be by far our best threat in the passing game, at least out of the gate. We have no BTEs behind him who can stretch the defense unless Culp is far more ready than I expect.
I think the people behind and around Gaines are more ready to fill in for him than the people and around behind Bryant.
I'm not saying for the whole season but for the Auburn game, which basically is the season.
I think our receiving core will be very good by the end of the year but like Auburn's OL I don't think they'll be good out of the gate. For this game I think we can handle Auburn's OL without Gaines. I think Bryant would be a bigger difference maker. -
Reasonable people can disagree!AIRWOLF said:
You explained your rationale well, but I still think it is wrong.dnc said:
I know it's going to be an unpopular take but hear me out.Gladstone said:
Right now Aaron Fuller is our best pass catcher. I like Fuller and think he's underrated here but he's best suited as a #3, at best.
Bryant would be by far our best threat in the passing game, at least out of the gate. We have no BTEs behind him who can stretch the defense unless Culp is far more ready than I expect.
I think the people behind and around Gaines are more ready to fill in for him than the people and around behind Bryant.
I'm not saying for the whole season but for the Auburn game, which basically is the season.
I think our receiving core will be very good by the end of the year but like Auburn's OL I don't think they'll be good out of the gate. For this game I think we can handle Auburn's OL without Gaines. I think Bryant would be a bigger difference maker. -
I'll be honest with you. You see, here at Hardcore Husky, there's a lot of trolls. And before the games, they like to fuck with the opposing fanbase, sometimes by saying they're winning 34-17, sometimes by pretending the game is not on the right stadium, sometimes by making up players. "Gaines" is not injured because he does not exist. Sorry, my man. Good luck to your Tigers and let's hope for a clean game, with no injuries.
-
get fucked.dnc said:
Reasonable people can disagree!AIRWOLF said:
You explained your rationale well, but I still think it is wrong.dnc said:
I know it's going to be an unpopular take but hear me out.Gladstone said:
Right now Aaron Fuller is our best pass catcher. I like Fuller and think he's underrated here but he's best suited as a #3, at best.
Bryant would be by far our best threat in the passing game, at least out of the gate. We have no BTEs behind him who can stretch the defense unless Culp is far more ready than I expect.
I think the people behind and around Gaines are more ready to fill in for him than the people and around behind Bryant.
I'm not saying for the whole season but for the Auburn game, which basically is the season.
I think our receiving core will be very good by the end of the year but like Auburn's OL I don't think they'll be good out of the gate. For this game I think we can handle Auburn's OL without Gaines. I think Bryant would be a bigger difference maker. -
Gaines is a much bigger loss
-
Appreciate youGladstone said:
get fucked.dnc said:
Reasonable people can disagree!AIRWOLF said:
You explained your rationale well, but I still think it is wrong.dnc said:
I know it's going to be an unpopular take but hear me out.Gladstone said:
Right now Aaron Fuller is our best pass catcher. I like Fuller and think he's underrated here but he's best suited as a #3, at best.
Bryant would be by far our best threat in the passing game, at least out of the gate. We have no BTEs behind him who can stretch the defense unless Culp is far more ready than I expect.
I think the people behind and around Gaines are more ready to fill in for him than the people and around behind Bryant.
I'm not saying for the whole season but for the Auburn game, which basically is the season.
I think our receiving core will be very good by the end of the year but like Auburn's OL I don't think they'll be good out of the gate. For this game I think we can handle Auburn's OL without Gaines. I think Bryant would be a bigger difference maker.
