Genuine Question for the Quooks
He stated that the Ducks will have the best front 7 in the Pac-12. I know Jelks and Scott are really good players, as well as Dye.
But while I admittedly didn't watch enough of Oregon to know, I can't name another player in that front 7.
Is this Koolaid something that all Quooks are drinking right now? Genuinely curious.
TIA
Comments
-
Is Hopkins a Quook who's full of hyperbole? Yes. Did you forget the guy with the best chance at starting at UW in Justin Hollins? Yes.
It's a really good front seven with question marks at cornerback. -
I'm looking forward to steamrolling another Leavitt defense.
-
Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes. -
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need. -
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need. -
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next. -
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried. -
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact. -
@Swaye might as well add it to the total board now.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried. -
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact. -
25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.Mosster47 said:
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact.
Fuck.
-
Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.
You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.
You have 2 Pac titles in the last 25 years. Oregon has 7.
You've played in 3 BCS/NY6 level bowl in the last 25 years. Oregon played in 8.
2001 is when it all changed though, huh? -
Quooking is at a fever pitch - this is the hottest off season take yet.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes. -
From 94 to 03 Oregon won 5, UW won 4. Oregon hosted 5, UW hosted 4.Mosster47 said:Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.
You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.
From 94 to 03 Oregon finished above UW in the conference 4 times. UW finished above Oregon in the conference 4 times. And they tied two times.
There's no real reasonable argument for Oregon passing UW before 2001, but even then UW smashed them the next two years. Realistically Oregon passed UW in 2004. So 12 years. Call it 15 if you prefer I'm good with.
Major lol at 25. -
So the Doogs still haven't passed Oregon yet. They are 2-2 over the last four games. Both teams were in the playoff in that span.dnc said:
From 94 to 03 Oregon won 5, UW won 4. Oregon hosted 5, UW hosted 4.Mosster47 said:Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.
You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.
From 94 to 03 Oregon finished above UW in the conference 4 times. UW finished above Oregon in the conference 4 times. And they tied two times.
There's no real reasonable argument for Oregon passing UW before 2001, but even then UW smashed them the next two years. Realistically Oregon passed UW in 2004. So 12 years. Call it 15 if you prefer I'm good with.
Major lol at 25.
I'm basing this off your logic. -
MoosterFuckingStupid as usual
Oregons backers are better and have better pass rushers. Washingtons defensive line and secondary are better than Oregons with the secondary being leaps and bounds better. Oregon safety depth better get a fucking clue lol.
Oregon's defense will be improved but Washington's defense is still much better. -
Clearly....dnc said:
25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.Mosster47 said:
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact.
Fuck.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Clearly....dnc said:
25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.Mosster47 said:
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact.
Fuck.
-
Not in the last 4 years.Mosster47 said:
So the Doogs still haven't passed Oregon yet. They are 2-2 over the last four games. Both teams were in the playoff in that span.dnc said:
From 94 to 03 Oregon won 5, UW won 4. Oregon hosted 5, UW hosted 4.Mosster47 said:Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.
You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.
From 94 to 03 Oregon finished above UW in the conference 4 times. UW finished above Oregon in the conference 4 times. And they tied two times.
There's no real reasonable argument for Oregon passing UW before 2001, but even then UW smashed them the next two years. Realistically Oregon passed UW in 2004. So 12 years. Call it 15 if you prefer I'm good with.
Major lol at 25.
I'm basing this off your logic.
Yes in the last 2 years.
This is of course the problem with selective endpoints, we can make them say whatever we want to. -
Oregon football is dead. No one gave a fuck about the Vegas Bowl, not the team, not the fans. HTH. No one showed up to play. No one wanted to see faggot Freeman give a motivational speech while his fat ass sat on the bench. No one wanted to see the debut of Knight's discount aisle head coach. Only ultra quooks changed previously scheduled plans to watch that shit. HTFH.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Clearly....dnc said:
25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.Mosster47 said:
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact.
Fuck. -
Straight out of the doog playbook, recruiting rankings. How freaking cool for the quooks man.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Clearly....dnc said:
25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.Mosster47 said:
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact.
Fuck. -
He’s a hopeless quook.
He doesn’t understand the difference between a closing gap and actually surpassing. The D-line and linebacking groups at Oregon are greatly improved, and have made progress closing the gap between them and Washington’s group. But Washington’s is still better, and it really isn’t debatable.
Quarterback play is the only thing that Oregon can hope for to end the Washington streak at 2. Herbert is unproven, but Browning is below average. -
Fucking bingogreenblood said:He’s a hopeless quook.
He doesn’t understand the difference between a closing gap and actually surpassing. The D-line and linebacking groups at Oregon are greatly improved, and have made progress closing the gap between them and Washington’s group. But Washington’s is still better, and it really isn’t debatable.
Quarterback play is the only thing that Oregon can hope for to end the Washington streak at 2. Herbert is unproven, but Browning is below average. -
So now any time a team wins two years in a row the program flip flop?dnc said:
Not in the last 4 years.Mosster47 said:
So the Doogs still haven't passed Oregon yet. They are 2-2 over the last four games. Both teams were in the playoff in that span.dnc said:
From 94 to 03 Oregon won 5, UW won 4. Oregon hosted 5, UW hosted 4.Mosster47 said:Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.
You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.
From 94 to 03 Oregon finished above UW in the conference 4 times. UW finished above Oregon in the conference 4 times. And they tied two times.
There's no real reasonable argument for Oregon passing UW before 2001, but even then UW smashed them the next two years. Realistically Oregon passed UW in 2004. So 12 years. Call it 15 if you prefer I'm good with.
Major lol at 25.
I'm basing this off your logic.
Yes in the last 2 years.
This is of course the problem with selective endpoints, we can make them say whatever we want to.
How long is this field goal? You keep moving the posts. -
Invalid argument, bro. Those aren't OKGs.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Clearly....dnc said:
25 years? We? didn't fall behind Oregon until 2001. We've clearly been ahead since 2016. So yeah, 25 years.Mosster47 said:
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact.
Fuck. -
I didn’t move them. We both know we passed you in 2016.Mosster47 said:
So now any time a team wins two years in a row the program flip flop?dnc said:
Not in the last 4 years.Mosster47 said:
So the Doogs still haven't passed Oregon yet. They are 2-2 over the last four games. Both teams were in the playoff in that span.dnc said:
From 94 to 03 Oregon won 5, UW won 4. Oregon hosted 5, UW hosted 4.Mosster47 said:Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.
You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.
From 94 to 03 Oregon finished above UW in the conference 4 times. UW finished above Oregon in the conference 4 times. And they tied two times.
There's no real reasonable argument for Oregon passing UW before 2001, but even then UW smashed them the next two years. Realistically Oregon passed UW in 2004. So 12 years. Call it 15 if you prefer I'm good with.
Major lol at 25.
I'm basing this off your logic.
Yes in the last 2 years.
This is of course the problem with selective endpoints, we can make them say whatever we want to.
How long is this field goal? You keep moving the posts.
HTH -
dnc said:
I didn’t move them. We both know we peaked in 2016.Mosster47 said:
So now any time a team wins two years in a row the program flip flop?dnc said:
Not in the last 4 years.Mosster47 said:
So the Doogs still haven't passed Oregon yet. They are 2-2 over the last four games. Both teams were in the playoff in that span.dnc said:
From 94 to 03 Oregon won 5, UW won 4. Oregon hosted 5, UW hosted 4.Mosster47 said:Your 1994 calendar is as good as mine.
You're 8-17 against Oregon over the last 25 years.
From 94 to 03 Oregon finished above UW in the conference 4 times. UW finished above Oregon in the conference 4 times. And they tied two times.
There's no real reasonable argument for Oregon passing UW before 2001, but even then UW smashed them the next two years. Realistically Oregon passed UW in 2004. So 12 years. Call it 15 if you prefer I'm good with.
Major lol at 25.
I'm basing this off your logic.
Yes in the last 2 years.
This is of course the problem with selective endpoints, we can make them say whatever we want to.
How long is this field goal? You keep moving the posts.
HTH -
@dnc was there for the original Bellotti is mediocre wars. He knows his stuff
-
@dnc was there for the original Bellotti is mediocre wars. He knows his stuff
-
@RaceBannon was there for the original Bellotti is mediocre wars. He knows his stuff
