Genuine Question for the Quooks
He stated that the Ducks will have the best front 7 in the Pac-12. I know Jelks and Scott are really good players, as well as Dye.
But while I admittedly didn't watch enough of Oregon to know, I can't name another player in that front 7.
Is this Koolaid something that all Quooks are drinking right now? Genuinely curious.
TIA
Comments
-
Is Hopkins a Quook who's full of hyperbole? Yes. Did you forget the guy with the best chance at starting at UW in Justin Hollins? Yes.
It's a really good front seven with question marks at cornerback. -
I'm looking forward to steamrolling another Leavitt defense.
-
Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes. -
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need. -
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need. -
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next. -
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried. -
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact. -
@Swaye might as well add it to the total board now.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried. -
9-3 at best is the swan song. This will be fact. It took UW 25 years of trying to catch Oregon to lose a Rose Bowl and go back the mean four years later. Schweet.dnc said:
I didn't say he was better than Vea you dipshit.Mosster47 said:
Yeah, Gregory Gaines is better than Vea. This is going to be a long season for you.dnc said:
Gaines started ahead of Vea in 2015 and 2016. We've seen plenty of him without Vita and he looked great.Mosster47 said:
No they aren't. Your Haloti Ngata is gone. Now you get to see what Brett Haberly looks like in a normal defense. Sorry, but Byrd, Chung, Ward, and WT3 won't really make a difference.dnc said:
UW is going to have a top 10 defense in the country rather easily.Mosster47 said:Oregon and UW are opposites on D this year. UW is really good on the back end and will be average up front, Oregon the opposite. In the Pac-12 I'm not sure which is better. They play some stupid football out west.
As far as position breakdowns Jelks would be UW's top book end by a country mile. Hollins would probably start at the other end spot for them also as the 40 personnel works a lot differently. Oregon's backer group is way better top to bottom, no one would argue that. UW has better starters in the secondary. I would take Oregon's depth at safety and the corner depth is probably a wash. D-lineman is probably a wash too. Gaines and Scott are big time gap stuffers and everyone else is a Pac-12 D-lineman which equals mediocre at best.
Both of these defenses and going to get rail roaded a few times this year as they have holes.
Lots of good moments in here but major LOL at the corner depth is a wash.
Get all the screenshots you need.
Next.
I'll tell you what, if the Doogs finish the regular season better than 9-3 I'll give Stalin $200.
I'm not worried.
He started ahead of him for two seasons. Fact.
We've seen him without Vea. Fact.
He's looked great without Vea. Fact.
Quooks hate facts. Fact.
