Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

DM to Pope Francis

YellowSnow
YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    In other news about Pope Francis.

    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/baby-brain-tumor-underwent-miraculous-recovery-kiss-pope-francis-204550103.html
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    wasnt sandatsky married?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    dnc said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    wasnt sandatsky married?
    Axe @backthepack
    oh boy

    hurts HH imo
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Pitchfork51 said:

    dnc said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    wasnt sandatsky married?
    Axe @backthepack
    oh boy

    hurts HH imo
    but does it really?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    I understand the historical context somewhat for how having a celebrate clergy came about. But in this day and age how can the church think you are going to get anything but a very high percentage a strange dudes as priests with current policy? It's against the laws of nature to not be allowed some sexy time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    He’s a communist piece of shit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2018
    Current Pope is a socialist.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    He’s a communist piece of shit

    We're not talking about that. Is he for or against TBSing is the question at hand?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Hippopeteamus
    Hippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958
    They need more of guy's like this as bishops (even if they laicize them later, at least it will not be because they are pedos):

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club
    Hippopeteamus said:

    They need more of guy's like this as bishops (even if they laicize them later, at least it will not be because they are pedos):

    Talleyrand!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    I like the church. They seem nice.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,404 Founders Club
    Doog_de_Jour said:

    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    I understand the historical context somewhat for how having a celebrate clergy came about. But in this day and age how can the church think you are going to get anything but a very high percentage a strange dudes as priests with current policy? It's against the laws of nature to not be allowed some sexy time.
    The Catholic Church only stopped saying mass in Latin in the 60s. They’re a little slow when it comes to adapting to the times.
    I agree, but Joseph Campbell once explained why they kept doing it for so long. It was an attempt to make the experience of hearing mass the same no matter where you were on earth. You would feel at home no matter what, at least in theory. Campbell also said that the original Latin was much more eloquent to listen to than the English, French, Spanish and German translations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    DerekJohnson said:

    Doog_de_Jour said:

    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    I understand the historical context somewhat for how having a celebrate clergy came about. But in this day and age how can the church think you are going to get anything but a very high percentage a strange dudes as priests with current policy? It's against the laws of nature to not be allowed some sexy time.
    The Catholic Church only stopped saying mass in Latin in the 60s. They’re a little slow when it comes to adapting to the times.
    I agree, but Joseph Campbell once explained why they kept doing it for so long. It was an attempt to make the experience of hearing mass the same no matter where you were on earth. You would feel at home no matter what, at least in theory. Campbell also said that the original Latin was much more eloquent to listen to than the English, French, Spanish and German translations.
    Nothing makes me feel more at home than people speaking a language I don't understand.

    It's a romantic idea.

    FS in practice.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2018
    DerekJohnson said:

    Doog_de_Jour said:

    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    I understand the historical context somewhat for how having a celebrate clergy came about. But in this day and age how can the church think you are going to get anything but a very high percentage a strange dudes as priests with current policy? It's against the laws of nature to not be allowed some sexy time.
    The Catholic Church only stopped saying mass in Latin in the 60s. They’re a little slow when it comes to adapting to the times.
    I agree, but Joseph Campbell once explained why they kept doing it for so long. It was an attempt to make the experience of hearing mass the same no matter where you were on earth. You would feel at home no matter what, at least in theory. Campbell also said that the original Latin was much more eloquent to listen to than the English, French, Spanish and German translations.
    I don’t disagree with that in many ways. There’s something beautiful about hearing old Gregorian chants for example, and I don’t think any institution should throw out its traditions on a whim.

    However (and this is mostly my Protestant background talking) the Catholic Church for a long time looked down on the Bible or any other church materials being translated into the country’s native language because they didn’t want lay people reading it and interrupting things for themselves.

    Sadly I think it was more about control than preserving the liturgy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Hippopeteamus
    Hippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958
    YellowSnow said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    They need more of guy's like this as bishops (even if they laicize them later, at least it will not be because they are pedos):

    Talleyrand!!
    Man, Duff Cooper's (who was a friend of Churchill) biography of him is amazing. Basically, it comes across that Talleyrand was France, both during and after Napoleon. Also he Eugene Delacoix was also probably his bastard son. He also refused Aaron Burr when Burr came to France, having a messenger tell Burr a painting of Hamilton hung above his fireplace. Apparently during a coup he was largely responsible for in France, he spent his time playing wist with some lovely laddies of high society. He was also responsible along with Metternich and Castlereagh for establishing a lasting peace in Europe after Napoleon's defeat. As a Bishop, he apparently forgot the words to a service and had to be guided through by another priest.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter
    Doog_de_Jour said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Doog_de_Jour said:

    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    I understand the historical context somewhat for how having a celebrate clergy came about. But in this day and age how can the church think you are going to get anything but a very high percentage a strange dudes as priests with current policy? It's against the laws of nature to not be allowed some sexy time.
    The Catholic Church only stopped saying mass in Latin in the 60s. They’re a little slow when it comes to adapting to the times.
    I agree, but Joseph Campbell once explained why they kept doing it for so long. It was an attempt to make the experience of hearing mass the same no matter where you were on earth. You would feel at home no matter what, at least in theory. Campbell also said that the original Latin was much more eloquent to listen to than the English, French, Spanish and German translations.
    I don’t disagree with that in many ways. There’s something beautiful about hearing old Gregorian chants for example, and I don’t think any institution should throw out its traditions on a whim.

    However (and this is mostly my Protestant background talking) the Catholic Church for a long time looked down on the Bible or any other church materials being translated into the country’s native language because they didn’t want lay people reading it and interrupting things for themselves.

    Sadly I think it was more about control than preserving the liturgy.
    BTW, I should clarify my last statement because I just remembered something - the Catholic Church didn’t necessarily ban vernacular versions of the Bible, there had been translations done even before the Gutenberg press came along...they just got nervous about “unauthorized” / heretical copies getting into circulation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Doog_de_Jour said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Doog_de_Jour said:

    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    I understand the historical context somewhat for how having a celebrate clergy came about. But in this day and age how can the church think you are going to get anything but a very high percentage a strange dudes as priests with current policy? It's against the laws of nature to not be allowed some sexy time.
    The Catholic Church only stopped saying mass in Latin in the 60s. They’re a little slow when it comes to adapting to the times.
    I agree, but Joseph Campbell once explained why they kept doing it for so long. It was an attempt to make the experience of hearing mass the same no matter where you were on earth. You would feel at home no matter what, at least in theory. Campbell also said that the original Latin was much more eloquent to listen to than the English, French, Spanish and German translations.
    I don’t disagree with that in many ways. There’s something beautiful about hearing old Gregorian chants for example, and I don’t think any institution should throw out its traditions on a whim.

    However (and this is mostly my Protestant background talking) the Catholic Church for a long time looked down on the Bible or any other church materials being translated into the country’s native language because they didn’t want lay people reading it and interrupting things for themselves.

    Sadly I think it was more about control than preserving the liturgy.
    Take it to yellow board. Gregorian chanting sucks ass.

    I had to take a history of american music class and a whole test was devoted to gregorian chanting. I couldnt tell the difference between any of that shit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter
    Pitchfork51 said:

    Doog_de_Jour said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Doog_de_Jour said:

    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    YellowSnow said:

    You think now might finally be the time to recruit a few straight priests and let them marry?

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/cleansing-the-catholic-church-of-its-sins.html

    The priests can't marry thing is such chinsanity to me. It's just begging for trouble. And they've certainly found it.
    I understand the historical context somewhat for how having a celebrate clergy came about. But in this day and age how can the church think you are going to get anything but a very high percentage a strange dudes as priests with current policy? It's against the laws of nature to not be allowed some sexy time.
    The Catholic Church only stopped saying mass in Latin in the 60s. They’re a little slow when it comes to adapting to the times.
    I agree, but Joseph Campbell once explained why they kept doing it for so long. It was an attempt to make the experience of hearing mass the same no matter where you were on earth. You would feel at home no matter what, at least in theory. Campbell also said that the original Latin was much more eloquent to listen to than the English, French, Spanish and German translations.
    I don’t disagree with that in many ways. There’s something beautiful about hearing old Gregorian chants for example, and I don’t think any institution should throw out its traditions on a whim.

    However (and this is mostly my Protestant background talking) the Catholic Church for a long time looked down on the Bible or any other church materials being translated into the country’s native language because they didn’t want lay people reading it and interrupting things for themselves.

    Sadly I think it was more about control than preserving the liturgy.
    Take it to yellow board. Gregorian chanting sucks ass.

    I had to take a history of american music class and a whole test was devoted to gregorian chanting. I couldnt tell the difference between any of that shit
    How on earth did your instructor consider Gregorian chanting part of American music? Did they shoehorn it into the section on gospel music?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Catholics have always been fags. If Jesus came back today, they would probably persecute Him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    DerekJohnson said:

    Okay guys knock it off. Let's remember that the parents of popes read this board.

    Stalin, can we rename the TBS board to the Catholic Church? for a like a week
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    phineas said:


    race is that you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,072
    PurpleJ said:

    Catholics have always been fags. If Jesus came back today, they would probably persecute Him.

    That explains why a Catholic girl took the Throbber’s virginity. All her kind were fags so she needed the big Protestant Purple One.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    WeakarmCobra said:

    phineas said:


    race is that you?
    Hands too quick
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter