Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Athlon predicts Washington to go undefeated through regular season

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,259 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
https://athlonsports.com/college-football/outrageous-college-football-predictions-pac-12-2018
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 2,994
    12-0 should be the expectation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    Fake news
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baphomet
    Baphomet Member Posts: 1,511
    They aren't perfect, but they also predict Oregon will have a losing record this year and that sounds spot on to me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bread
    Bread Member Posts: 4,073
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I wouldn't bet on oregon to beat a oregon state.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,165 Standard Supporter
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    Stanford is a legit playoff team? They play ND, Oregon, and UW all on the road and have a mediocre defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 2,994
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    AEB said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    Pumpeii good at everything.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    AEB said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,376
    jfc we? so fucked.

    i heard the 2018 holiday bowel will be special.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HUSKYFANATIC
    HUSKYFANATIC Member Posts: 1,651
    Owen twelve
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,126
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    Oregon sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 2,994
    Pitchfork51 said:

    AEB said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
    Maybe. NGAF about Williams west of the Sierras.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    UW is NOT going undefeated in pac-12 play with Browning. Good shite who u going to believe Athlon or Puppy? I know the smart pick.

    This is the most compelling argument I've heard for UW going undefeated yet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    AEB said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    AEB said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
    Maybe. NGAF about Williams west of the Sierras.
    I dont know what williams is either
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,216 Founders Club
    edited August 2018
    Pitchfork51 said:

    AEB said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
    Williams knows what tuff looking real purple and real gold looks like. Plus they have the small liberal arts college academis and 2.5 billion endowment to give Creep major wood.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter