Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Athlon predicts Washington to go undefeated through regular season

2»

Comments

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,691
    AEB said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,452
    jfc we? so fucked.

    i heard the 2018 holiday bowel will be special.
  • HUSKYFANATIC
    HUSKYFANATIC Member Posts: 1,651
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,520 Swaye's Wigwam

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    Oregon sucks.
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 3,023

    AEB said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
    Maybe. NGAF about Williams west of the Sierras.
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194

    UW is NOT going undefeated in pac-12 play with Browning. Good shite who u going to believe Athlon or Puppy? I know the smart pick.

    This is the most compelling argument I've heard for UW going undefeated yet.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,691
    AEB said:

    AEB said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
    Maybe. NGAF about Williams west of the Sierras.
    I dont know what williams is either
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,832 Founders Club
    edited August 2018

    AEB said:

    AEB said:

    12-0 should be the expectation.

    Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

    Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?
    I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.
    I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw
    Williams knows what tuff looking real purple and real gold looks like. Plus they have the small liberal arts college academis and 2.5 billion endowment to give Creep major wood.