Athlon predicts Washington to go undefeated through regular season

DerekJohnson

https://athlonsports.com/college-football/outrageous-college-football-predictions-pac-12-2018

Mad_Son

The worst part about being relevant again is now there are a bajillion articles citing browning as a positive factor. It just highlights what we've already known that these national maroons don't know shit.

puppylove_sugarsteel

UW is NOT going undefeated in pac-12 play with Browning. Good shite who u going to believe Athlon or Puppy? I know the smart pick.

AEB

12-0 should be the expectation.

ApostleofGrief

Fake news

puppylove_sugarsteel

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

Baphomet

They aren't perfect, but they also predict Oregon will have a losing record this year and that sounds spot on to me.

Bread

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

I wouldn't bet on oregon to beat a oregon state.

BleachedAnusDawg

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

Stanford is a legit playoff team? They play ND, Oregon, and UW all on the road and have a mediocre defense.

AEB

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.

GrundleStiltzkin

AEB said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.

Pumpeii good at everything.

Pitchfork51

AEB said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.

I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw

rodmansrage

jfc we? so fucked.

i heard the 2018 holiday bowel will be special.

HUSKYFANATIC

Owen twelve

Kaepsknee

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

Whew! Football season has arrived when pump gets Rollin with the Hot Takes. It’s been too long.

RoadDawg55

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

Oregon sucks.

AEB

Pitchfork51 said:

AEB said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.

I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw

Maybe. NGAF about Williams west of the Sierras.

Mad_Son

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

UW is NOT going undefeated in pac-12 play with Browning. Good shite who u going to believe Athlon or Puppy? I know the smart pick.

This is the most compelling argument I've heard for UW going undefeated yet.

Pitchfork51

AEB said:

Pitchfork51 said:

AEB said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.

I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw

Maybe. NGAF about Williams west of the Sierras.

I dont know what williams is either

YellowSnow

Pitchfork51 said:

AEB said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AEB said:

12-0 should be the expectation.

Nothing to do with 'expectation' new fish. It's where an objective mag thinks a team will finish based on facts. Does anybody east of Rockies know how really fucking good the top of the north is? The answer is a resounding fucking NO! Stanford and Washington are legit playoff teams in a fair system. Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Now, is UW likely to go just undefeated in their own league?

I’ve skimmed your bullshit for years. I live way SouthEast of the Rockies and you’re right NGAF about the PAC North and frankly there’s little reason they should. I wear my 1990 purple W lid and people ask me if I went to Williams. If Athlon has UW at 12-0, they’re right, UW should be 12-0. I don’t think Oregon is as good as you say, and Stanford always has the same athletic limitations. You’re already setting up excuses for why UW loses to a tuff ASU team this year.

I assume the 90s W lid is a Williams hat too fwiw

Williams knows what tuff looking real purple and real gold looks like. Plus they have the small liberal arts college academis and 2.5 billion endowment to give Creep major wood.

whatshouldicareabout

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Oregon is good enough to beat 100% of big12, 13-14 in ACC (ND not a member), 11-14 in SEC or BIG10.

Oregon football is dead. No one gave a fuck about the Vegas Bowl, not the team, not the fans. HTH. No one showed up to play. No one wanted to see faggot Freeman give a motivational speech while his fat ass sat on the bench. No one wanted to see the debut of Knight's discount aisle head coach. Only ultra quooks changed previously scheduled plans to watch that shit. HTFH.