Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sankey is 50-50 on his decision
HeretoBeatmyChest
Member Posts: 4,295
Per Joe Schad Twitter.
Meeting with coach Petersen.
Sankey should go but I'd love to see him in CP's offense. Hope he comes back.
Meeting with coach Petersen.
Sankey should go but I'd love to see him in CP's offense. Hope he comes back.
Comments
-
He should leave - he has an NFL shelf life of what about 6-10 years, because of his size?
-
He should stay. He has a shot at the Heisman and Doak Walker. Also an actual championship. He can work on getting bigger, which he needs to so for the NFL..
Yeah yeah yeah..it's classy to throw out the cliches.. "he needs to take care of his family, he has done all he can at UW, he has a short shelf life , his stock won't go any higher, he is well spoken, etc." Classy shit.
I care about UW winning and the best way to do it next year is with Sankey. You all popped wood when Locker came back, Sankey needs to as well in order for the team to be better.
Fuck the classy platitudes. Fuck them, fuck you, fuck me, fuck everyone. -
Even though Sankey is projected as one of the better RBs in the draft people are still saying round 3/4 is looking most likely, just not a lot of demand for them in this draft.
Come back and win the Doak Walker, as well as be a Heisman finalist and get 2nd/1st round value. -
50/50 is nonsense. According to my buddy who knows one of the players, Sankey is a definite 56/44.
-
I was bummed when Locker returned.
The article Doog Millen wrote in the Times about why Locker should return was ignorant at best (unlikely) and dishonest at worst.
Sankey should go.
John Calipari is the only honest coach in college sports. -
I think Bishop should give his grandfather (cornea replacement 9/20/2013) the pleasure of seeing him play an entire collegiate season, which could include a Heisman and or Doak Walker while setting the UW career rushing record.
-
Cocks get hard, cunts get dirty, assholes get plungered, the sky is blue, running backs have a short shelf-life...zip up the pie hole bitch. Sankey didnt redshirt and his size is average for d-1 tailbacks. One more year isnt going to damage his body and pro career. Fuck I get sick of hole surfers like yourself who just spew out shit you hear from others who never played the game, of understand ANY fucking thing about the game.priapism said:He should leave - he has an NFL shelf life of what about 6-10 years, because of his size?
Running backs dont get drafted in the top5 anymore unless they're special. Sankey could get his degree and get drafted in that group. MUCH higher than Doug Martin did, IF he came back and rushed for 2000, won the heisman etc... plus shatter ever UW record .
Go back and learn from Y a le Dawgs film study then come back. You're not ready for the HH heavy hitters yet youngin! -
54/40 or fight
-
Sark should write Polk and Sankey in to his fucking will. They got him the job at USC.
Without those 2 he is a .350 coach. -
Whistler, WA would be totally sweet. But it would have sucked ass when I was 19 in college...RaceBannon said:54/40 or fight
-
Ifs ands or buts is doog speak.koopdog said:Sark should write Polk and Sankey in to his fucking will. They got him the job at USC.
Without those 2 he is a .350 coach.
A 34-29 coach. Nothing more.
-
I think it's more like 81 percent chance he stays.
-
What? Unbelievable! It can't be more than 79 % max. Leave!TheHB said:I think it's more like 81 percent chance he stays.
-
he could blow a knee on the first play against Grays Harbor Community College, too. and he wouldn't have a contract.
-
He wants to stay. He's leaning towards staying. He's excited about a new offense. He wants to know about how they plan on using him before he makes a decision.
-
-
81/19 is what i'm hearing
-
Bishop Sankey is Petersen's biggest "OKG" of his career. If Sankey comes back I expect UW to win the conference next year. I also think he'll be our first player since Steve Emtman invited to New York for the Heisman presentation.
-
Sankey is gone.
-
Do you think Sankey could have as big of an impact as Corey Dillon in 1996?He_Needs_More_Time said:Bishop Sankey is Petersen's biggest "OKG" of his career. If Sankey comes back I expect UW to win the conference next year. I also think he'll be our first player since Steve Emtman invited to New York for the Heisman presentation.
-
I think bigger since LamboFS didn't start Dillon until game 5(pretty sick to think what his stats could have been if he was a starter game one). Not to mention that team did go 9-3 and I expect worst case scenario 10-3 in the regular season next year.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Do you think Sankey could have as big of an impact as Corey Dillon in 1996?He_Needs_More_Time said:Bishop Sankey is Petersen's biggest "OKG" of his career. If Sankey comes back I expect UW to win the conference next year. I also think he'll be our first player since Steve Emtman invited to New York for the Heisman presentation.
-
Someone tweet this:
51/49. -
He might win the damn thing If we don't have too many late games.
-
There is just something about Lambo I don't like aside from the fact he sucked. Fucking AAANDY was intimating if not for blowing the USC game in 95 that Lambo would have had two Rose Bowls (coaching the 2000 team). He fucking cost us 2-3 Rose Bowls in the mid 90s.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I think bigger since LamboFS didn't start Dillon until game 5(pretty sick to think what his stats could have been if he was a starter game one). Not to mention that team did go 9-3 and I expect worst case scenario 10-3 in the regular season next year.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Do you think Sankey could have as big of an impact as Corey Dillon in 1996?He_Needs_More_Time said:Bishop Sankey is Petersen's biggest "OKG" of his career. If Sankey comes back I expect UW to win the conference next year. I also think he'll be our first player since Steve Emtman invited to New York for the Heisman presentation.
-
Cost us the 1995 season for sure, 1994 should have won the Pac-10 as well(I know wasn't eligible for Rose Bowl). In 1996 unfortunately the Pac-10 championship was the first game of the season so I don't fault him for that(was badly outcoached by Rick in the bowl game).HeretoBeatmyChest said:
There is just something about Lambo I don't like aside from the fact he sucked. Fucking AAANDY was intimating if not for blowing the USC game in 95 that Lambo would have had two Rose Bowls (coaching the 2000 team). He fucking cost us 2-3 Rose Bowls in the mid 90s.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I think bigger since LamboFS didn't start Dillon until game 5(pretty sick to think what his stats could have been if he was a starter game one). Not to mention that team did go 9-3 and I expect worst case scenario 10-3 in the regular season next year.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Do you think Sankey could have as big of an impact as Corey Dillon in 1996?He_Needs_More_Time said:Bishop Sankey is Petersen's biggest "OKG" of his career. If Sankey comes back I expect UW to win the conference next year. I also think he'll be our first player since Steve Emtman invited to New York for the Heisman presentation.
In 1997 blew a possible national title. That team was probably more talented than any James team minus the 1990-1992 run and was more talented than 2000.
13 fucking guys to the NFL and yet went 8-4.
Nothing gets me going than Lambo revisionist history especially the "That was Lambo's Rose Bowl team". Ummm no he would have fucked it up like he did in 1994, 1995 and 1997. -
we still will have a mediocre OL next year. More experienced, but not great on talent. And a talented but pretty new QB. Sark had many chances to give Miles experience this year, and did not do it. If ASJ goes, you lose his blocking and capabilities as a threat. People will focus more easily on Sankey. If he can stay healthy, he still will have an awesome year and I would love it. And the schedule points to 10-3 or above, even with some losses to graduation and the NFL.
-
I'm going to hope that a new coach will help the OL. Cozzetto coaching resume is so fucking spotty after he left ASU in 99. He hasn't done anything of note since then. I doubt Petersen will completely ignore the OL like Sark did either. There is no reason an OL full of guys going into their third year as starters should be anything less than a top 3-4 unit in the conference.Global said:we still will have a mediocre OL next year. More experienced, but not great on talent. And a talented but pretty new QB. Sark had many chances to give Miles experience this year, and did not do it. If ASJ goes, you lose his blocking and capabilities as a threat. People will focus more easily on Sankey. If he can stay healthy, he still will have an awesome year and I would love it. And the schedule points to 10-3 or above, even with some losses to graduation and the NFL.
I'm not really worried about QB. I'm confident either Miles or Williams will be good. Price had a good year, but he was a little inconsistent. I don't think Miles was that far behind him this year.
I think the offense will be very good next year. I'm more worried about the defense, particularly the secondary. It's time to have a defense that shows up every game.
-
Bishop Sankey spotted at Seatac Airport......
-
Having Sankey would be great for whoever wins the QB battle next year, whether it is Miles, Williams, or this Greene kid we look to be poaching. Bishop will be the focal point of the offense making it much easier for the QB to be successful and gain confidence.
-
Get those pencil armed fat futt fuckers in the weight room and kick their ass every day from now until September. Fuck Ivan and his useless shit. Get some HGH and a real strength coach.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
