Trigger warning
Comments
-
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Get some new material you unoriginal piece of shit. You're a dog that's reached the end of its chain. The tug equivalent of a coog.dflea said:
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your demwit masters have nothing to run on. Nothing that actually works and hasn't caused catastrophes in other nations throughout history. Case closed. Suck a dick. Burn the fucking script.dflea said:
Yeah except I've never said anything even close to that, you little crying bitch.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dopes like you keep spouting off about how the dems should be crushing it in November. Explain why or shut the fuck up, no one has, you've got nothing, because you know demwit policies are completely fucktarded and you can't defend them. They can't run against Trump's failures, because he's been winning bigly for America in every category.dflea said:
Quit demanding answers for your stupid fucking questions like you're in charge around here you worthless fucking goat.oregonblitzkrieg said:
We've heard this same tired line over and over and over again with ZERO explanation as to why the Demwits should be kicking the shit out of the other party. Demwits support, among other feckless policies:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, if anything I think this hurts the Dems. Progressives can think they are going to win elections by veering far left all they want but there's a reason the Green Party gets shit for votes. It's the same FS thing the bible thumpers think on the Right, "If only we could get a candidate who will impose a Christian Theocracy we could win it all! Why doesn't the GOP see that?"2001400ex said:
See Race. He sounds scared.UW_Doog_Bot said:
She beat Joe Crowley who was the chair of the democratic congress. That's not a minor immaterial thing. She basically replaced one of the standard bearers and heads of the Dems.GrundleStiltzkin said:
But she did win, beating some kinda swinging dick incumbent as I recall. Conservative media is helping fan the flames for their own aims, but she got hugely mainstream coverage following that primary win. The DNC can't disavow her, so she'll continue to raise mucho dinero for both sides.2001400ex said:
She's not any more vocal that any other candidate. Look at it..... If she didn't win that race, she'd still be doing the same thing but we would never have heard about her. Her voice is loud now because the conservative media is giving her air time. Free pub if you will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh? Call it propaganda if you want, but it's nothing exotic. And by cooperative, I mean that Cortez is very vocal and out there trying to make herself the standard bearer for the nueva Democratic Party. Furthermore, it would be extremely touchy for the DNC to do anything overt to rein her in. Plus she's young and says stupid shit earnestly.2001400ex said:
Isn't saying cooperative boogeywoman implying it takes a propaganda machine? Just saying.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, that's electoral politics. She provides a cooperative boogeywoman to campaign against.2001400ex said:
Only idiots like you and propaganda machines are making her the face of the Democratic party.HoustonHusky said:
She has a BA in "Economics" and "International Relations" and she literally said "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family" . That just skims the surface of her crazy. She didn't say she wanted to replace ICE. She said and ran on the platform of abolishing Ice. She said she wanted to "Re-imagine" a new version.allpurpleallgold said:
Race is somewhat right about Ocasio-Cortez getting a free pub bump. The difference between her pub and Trump’s is Trump gets it for being crazy while Ocasio-Cortez is getting it by being accused of holding crazy positions that she doesn’t actually hold.dnc said:
yesallpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?dnc said:
Querey for APAG and Tommy. As our intelligent bored lefties, can you tell me if this chick is for real or is she just trolling conservatives?HoustonHusky said:Another stellar HondoFS poast...you will see why in a second.
A pertinent quote in the middle of it all..."if you don't pay attention to how they are going to pay for it or the rest of that..."
Her article that sparked it all...a much less flattering description of the event that basically says she sees how the HondoFSs of the world fall for it all. And here comes the man (?) himself on queue to prove her point...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/conservative-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-rally/
On a side note HondoFS...there is a much better twitter handle to follow if you want to follow her...
And the funniest news story of her today...
If she's just trolling I think she's kind of awesome. If she is really spending time and energy to go after Parker Brothers and Taco Bell, W.
JW.
Shes a young female version of HondoFS. There is a reason she was a bartender before she became the face of the new Democratic Party...I guess they are looking for a young, crazy Nancy Pelosi.
And no, her platform isn't my platform. But it is nice that it scares you, Race, sledog, and OBK. Pussies.
And yes she does say a bunch of stupid shit. In a bigger political race, she'll struggle to defend all the stupid shit she says. In her district, its mostly Democrats so they could run a communist and win.
The Dems should be kicking the shit out of the GOP at the mid-terms per the *script but they've got a serious problem in their own tent right now.
I'm pretty sure I'm on record saying that this girl getting elected in the primary was the best thing to happen for the GOP's midterms. Seems like that's how it's playing out to me. She's a great boogeyman that can't just be written off because of who it is she beat.
- Socialism
- Open borders
- Higher taxes
- "Gun control" (the end game here is gun confiscation or blocking gun sales, like socialist utopia Toronto is about to do)
- Restricted speech ('hate speech' laws, also rife in socialist Canada)
- A corrupt FBI/DOJ that they have no intention of investigating
- Racism and identity politics
Meanwhile Trump has been doing the following, among other accomplishments:
- Blitzed the EU and is forcing them to adopt a zero tariff policy
- Taking the offensive against China, building an alliance with other trade partners against them
- Passed tax cuts
- Increased American wealth in the stock market
- Is putting Kim Jong UN in his place
- Destroyed ISIS
Please explain why the fuck these imbeciles should be 'kicking the shit out of the GOP' in November. "Because it's the script," is not an acceptable answer.
You're a pussy and a liar at the same time. -
I see you all bashing cock suckers and pussies. Look, if it keeps happening, I'm fucking out.
-
Why haven't Republicans passed term limits then?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination. -
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait... -
The critical issue of our timeThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait... -
The socialist majority is really keeping us down, manRaceBannon said:
The critical issue of our timeThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait... -
ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH. -
I didn't know Bernie controlled Congress.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH. -
Uhhoregonblitzkrieg said:
The GOP isn't the same GOP anymore you dumb Mexikraut. Get your lips off of flea's cock and get up to speed. The GOP you keep bitching about is the old guard. Trump destroyed them in 2016. Most people who support Trump are against them too. They are the establishment and are just as bad as 'democratic socialists.' Trump isn't even GOP. He's something else. Democrats will lose because Trump supports the ideas they used to value, you know things like free speech, better trade deals, solid border security, CAPITALISM.Pitchfork51 said:Democrats should win because GOP panders to the religious right and very very few americans actually identify with that.
However they lose due to completely retarded shit that a monkey with half a brain would not do if in charge.
1. Immigration stance. Jesus fucking christ. It's been a loser forever.
2. Guns. See 1
3. Running people like Hillary Clinton.
If these 3 things were changed they would be winning a good amount right now.
They don't even have to go full on out the other direction. Just soften the wackiness a bit.
But fuck me, they won't and they aren't. It's mind boggling.
I'd agree trump isnt GOP. But the rest of congress and the senate are.
People reluctantly falling in line wasn't him destroying them. They are just pussies going with the flow.
There isn't a new guard as far as I know. -
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time -
Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
The issue isn't current socialists holding up progress on term limits, it's socialist intentions once they get in power. Socialists don't support term limits. Are you disputing that?ThomasFremont said:
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time
A fucking socialist made a very strong showing in his party's nomination for president, and another socialist took down a major democrat figure. So yeah, it's an issue that deserves attention.
So why don't socialists support term limits? Lets see if you have the balls to answer a question the other tug socialists won't. -
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to impose failed systems of government from the 20th century on America.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better.
-
You really shouldn't use words that you don't understandoregonblitzkrieg said:
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to re-impose failed systems of government from the 20th century.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
Still waiting for the revolution of the 'new democrats' who are going to drag the country kicking and screaming into the 21st century.BearsWiin said:
You really shouldn't use words that you don't understandoregonblitzkrieg said:
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to re-impose failed systems of government from the 20th century.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
It's laughable because the pachouli masses are convinced Bernie it an outsider. Fucker's been in congress for 25 years.ThomasFremont said:
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time -
This and 4 other words are pretty much Fleas entire response vocabulary.dflea said:
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your demwit masters have nothing to run on. Nothing that actually works and hasn't caused catastrophes in other nations throughout history. Case closed. Suck a dick. Burn the fucking script.dflea said:
Yeah except I've never said anything even close to that, you little crying bitch.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dopes like you keep spouting off about how the dems should be crushing it in November. Explain why or shut the fuck up, no one has, you've got nothing, because you know demwit policies are completely fucktarded and you can't defend them. They can't run against Trump's failures, because he's been winning bigly for America in every category.dflea said:
Quit demanding answers for your stupid fucking questions like you're in charge around here you worthless fucking goat.oregonblitzkrieg said:
We've heard this same tired line over and over and over again with ZERO explanation as to why the Demwits should be kicking the shit out of the other party. Demwits support, among other feckless policies:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, if anything I think this hurts the Dems. Progressives can think they are going to win elections by veering far left all they want but there's a reason the Green Party gets shit for votes. It's the same FS thing the bible thumpers think on the Right, "If only we could get a candidate who will impose a Christian Theocracy we could win it all! Why doesn't the GOP see that?"2001400ex said:
See Race. He sounds scared.UW_Doog_Bot said:
She beat Joe Crowley who was the chair of the democratic congress. That's not a minor immaterial thing. She basically replaced one of the standard bearers and heads of the Dems.GrundleStiltzkin said:
But she did win, beating some kinda swinging dick incumbent as I recall. Conservative media is helping fan the flames for their own aims, but she got hugely mainstream coverage following that primary win. The DNC can't disavow her, so she'll continue to raise mucho dinero for both sides.2001400ex said:
She's not any more vocal that any other candidate. Look at it..... If she didn't win that race, she'd still be doing the same thing but we would never have heard about her. Her voice is loud now because the conservative media is giving her air time. Free pub if you will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh? Call it propaganda if you want, but it's nothing exotic. And by cooperative, I mean that Cortez is very vocal and out there trying to make herself the standard bearer for the nueva Democratic Party. Furthermore, it would be extremely touchy for the DNC to do anything overt to rein her in. Plus she's young and says stupid shit earnestly.2001400ex said:
Isn't saying cooperative boogeywoman implying it takes a propaganda machine? Just saying.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, that's electoral politics. She provides a cooperative boogeywoman to campaign against.2001400ex said:
Only idiots like you and propaganda machines are making her the face of the Democratic party.HoustonHusky said:
She has a BA in "Economics" and "International Relations" and she literally said "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family" . That just skims the surface of her crazy. She didn't say she wanted to replace ICE. She said and ran on the platform of abolishing Ice. She said she wanted to "Re-imagine" a new version.allpurpleallgold said:
Race is somewhat right about Ocasio-Cortez getting a free pub bump. The difference between her pub and Trump’s is Trump gets it for being crazy while Ocasio-Cortez is getting it by being accused of holding crazy positions that she doesn’t actually hold.dnc said:
yesallpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?dnc said:
Querey for APAG and Tommy. As our intelligent bored lefties, can you tell me if this chick is for real or is she just trolling conservatives?HoustonHusky said:Another stellar HondoFS poast...you will see why in a second.
A pertinent quote in the middle of it all..."if you don't pay attention to how they are going to pay for it or the rest of that..."
Her article that sparked it all...a much less flattering description of the event that basically says she sees how the HondoFSs of the world fall for it all. And here comes the man (?) himself on queue to prove her point...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/conservative-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-rally/
On a side note HondoFS...there is a much better twitter handle to follow if you want to follow her...
And the funniest news story of her today...
If she's just trolling I think she's kind of awesome. If she is really spending time and energy to go after Parker Brothers and Taco Bell, W.
JW.
Shes a young female version of HondoFS. There is a reason she was a bartender before she became the face of the new Democratic Party...I guess they are looking for a young, crazy Nancy Pelosi.
And no, her platform isn't my platform. But it is nice that it scares you, Race, sledog, and OBK. Pussies.
And yes she does say a bunch of stupid shit. In a bigger political race, she'll struggle to defend all the stupid shit she says. In her district, its mostly Democrats so they could run a communist and win.
The Dems should be kicking the shit out of the GOP at the mid-terms per the *script but they've got a serious problem in their own tent right now.
I'm pretty sure I'm on record saying that this girl getting elected in the primary was the best thing to happen for the GOP's midterms. Seems like that's how it's playing out to me. She's a great boogeyman that can't just be written off because of who it is she beat.
- Socialism
- Open borders
- Higher taxes
- "Gun control" (the end game here is gun confiscation or blocking gun sales, like socialist utopia Toronto is about to do)
- Restricted speech ('hate speech' laws, also rife in socialist Canada)
- A corrupt FBI/DOJ that they have no intention of investigating
- Racism and identity politics
Meanwhile Trump has been doing the following, among other accomplishments:
- Blitzed the EU and is forcing them to adopt a zero tariff policy
- Taking the offensive against China, building an alliance with other trade partners against them
- Passed tax cuts
- Increased American wealth in the stock market
- Is putting Kim Jong UN in his place
- Destroyed ISIS
Please explain why the fuck these imbeciles should be 'kicking the shit out of the GOP' in November. "Because it's the script," is not an acceptable answer.
You're a pussy and a liar at the same time. -
Call me when Republicans pass a bill with term limits. Until then they are just lying to you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Still waiting for the revolution of the 'new democrats' who are going to drag the country kicking and screaming into the 21st century.BearsWiin said:
You really shouldn't use words that you don't understandoregonblitzkrieg said:
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to re-impose failed systems of government from the 20th century.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
Go kill yourself.Sledog said:
This and 4 other words are pretty much Fleas entire response vocabulary.dflea said:
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your demwit masters have nothing to run on. Nothing that actually works and hasn't caused catastrophes in other nations throughout history. Case closed. Suck a dick. Burn the fucking script.dflea said:
Yeah except I've never said anything even close to that, you little crying bitch.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dopes like you keep spouting off about how the dems should be crushing it in November. Explain why or shut the fuck up, no one has, you've got nothing, because you know demwit policies are completely fucktarded and you can't defend them. They can't run against Trump's failures, because he's been winning bigly for America in every category.dflea said:
Quit demanding answers for your stupid fucking questions like you're in charge around here you worthless fucking goat.oregonblitzkrieg said:
We've heard this same tired line over and over and over again with ZERO explanation as to why the Demwits should be kicking the shit out of the other party. Demwits support, among other feckless policies:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, if anything I think this hurts the Dems. Progressives can think they are going to win elections by veering far left all they want but there's a reason the Green Party gets shit for votes. It's the same FS thing the bible thumpers think on the Right, "If only we could get a candidate who will impose a Christian Theocracy we could win it all! Why doesn't the GOP see that?"2001400ex said:
See Race. He sounds scared.UW_Doog_Bot said:
She beat Joe Crowley who was the chair of the democratic congress. That's not a minor immaterial thing. She basically replaced one of the standard bearers and heads of the Dems.GrundleStiltzkin said:
But she did win, beating some kinda swinging dick incumbent as I recall. Conservative media is helping fan the flames for their own aims, but she got hugely mainstream coverage following that primary win. The DNC can't disavow her, so she'll continue to raise mucho dinero for both sides.2001400ex said:
She's not any more vocal that any other candidate. Look at it..... If she didn't win that race, she'd still be doing the same thing but we would never have heard about her. Her voice is loud now because the conservative media is giving her air time. Free pub if you will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh? Call it propaganda if you want, but it's nothing exotic. And by cooperative, I mean that Cortez is very vocal and out there trying to make herself the standard bearer for the nueva Democratic Party. Furthermore, it would be extremely touchy for the DNC to do anything overt to rein her in. Plus she's young and says stupid shit earnestly.2001400ex said:
Isn't saying cooperative boogeywoman implying it takes a propaganda machine? Just saying.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, that's electoral politics. She provides a cooperative boogeywoman to campaign against.2001400ex said:
Only idiots like you and propaganda machines are making her the face of the Democratic party.HoustonHusky said:
She has a BA in "Economics" and "International Relations" and she literally said "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family" . That just skims the surface of her crazy. She didn't say she wanted to replace ICE. She said and ran on the platform of abolishing Ice. She said she wanted to "Re-imagine" a new version.allpurpleallgold said:
Race is somewhat right about Ocasio-Cortez getting a free pub bump. The difference between her pub and Trump’s is Trump gets it for being crazy while Ocasio-Cortez is getting it by being accused of holding crazy positions that she doesn’t actually hold.dnc said:
yesallpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?dnc said:
Querey for APAG and Tommy. As our intelligent bored lefties, can you tell me if this chick is for real or is she just trolling conservatives?HoustonHusky said:Another stellar HondoFS poast...you will see why in a second.
A pertinent quote in the middle of it all..."if you don't pay attention to how they are going to pay for it or the rest of that..."
Her article that sparked it all...a much less flattering description of the event that basically says she sees how the HondoFSs of the world fall for it all. And here comes the man (?) himself on queue to prove her point...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/conservative-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-rally/
On a side note HondoFS...there is a much better twitter handle to follow if you want to follow her...
And the funniest news story of her today...
If she's just trolling I think she's kind of awesome. If she is really spending time and energy to go after Parker Brothers and Taco Bell, W.
JW.
Shes a young female version of HondoFS. There is a reason she was a bartender before she became the face of the new Democratic Party...I guess they are looking for a young, crazy Nancy Pelosi.
And no, her platform isn't my platform. But it is nice that it scares you, Race, sledog, and OBK. Pussies.
And yes she does say a bunch of stupid shit. In a bigger political race, she'll struggle to defend all the stupid shit she says. In her district, its mostly Democrats so they could run a communist and win.
The Dems should be kicking the shit out of the GOP at the mid-terms per the *script but they've got a serious problem in their own tent right now.
I'm pretty sure I'm on record saying that this girl getting elected in the primary was the best thing to happen for the GOP's midterms. Seems like that's how it's playing out to me. She's a great boogeyman that can't just be written off because of who it is she beat.
- Socialism
- Open borders
- Higher taxes
- "Gun control" (the end game here is gun confiscation or blocking gun sales, like socialist utopia Toronto is about to do)
- Restricted speech ('hate speech' laws, also rife in socialist Canada)
- A corrupt FBI/DOJ that they have no intention of investigating
- Racism and identity politics
Meanwhile Trump has been doing the following, among other accomplishments:
- Blitzed the EU and is forcing them to adopt a zero tariff policy
- Taking the offensive against China, building an alliance with other trade partners against them
- Passed tax cuts
- Increased American wealth in the stock market
- Is putting Kim Jong UN in his place
- Destroyed ISIS
Please explain why the fuck these imbeciles should be 'kicking the shit out of the GOP' in November. "Because it's the script," is not an acceptable answer.
You're a pussy and a liar at the same time.
3 other words.
-
You missed one.dflea said:
Go kill yourself.Sledog said:
This and 4 other words are pretty much Fleas entire response vocabulary.dflea said:
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your demwit masters have nothing to run on. Nothing that actually works and hasn't caused catastrophes in other nations throughout history. Case closed. Suck a dick. Burn the fucking script.dflea said:
Yeah except I've never said anything even close to that, you little crying bitch.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dopes like you keep spouting off about how the dems should be crushing it in November. Explain why or shut the fuck up, no one has, you've got nothing, because you know demwit policies are completely fucktarded and you can't defend them. They can't run against Trump's failures, because he's been winning bigly for America in every category.dflea said:
Quit demanding answers for your stupid fucking questions like you're in charge around here you worthless fucking goat.oregonblitzkrieg said:
We've heard this same tired line over and over and over again with ZERO explanation as to why the Demwits should be kicking the shit out of the other party. Demwits support, among other feckless policies:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, if anything I think this hurts the Dems. Progressives can think they are going to win elections by veering far left all they want but there's a reason the Green Party gets shit for votes. It's the same FS thing the bible thumpers think on the Right, "If only we could get a candidate who will impose a Christian Theocracy we could win it all! Why doesn't the GOP see that?"2001400ex said:
See Race. He sounds scared.UW_Doog_Bot said:
She beat Joe Crowley who was the chair of the democratic congress. That's not a minor immaterial thing. She basically replaced one of the standard bearers and heads of the Dems.GrundleStiltzkin said:
But she did win, beating some kinda swinging dick incumbent as I recall. Conservative media is helping fan the flames for their own aims, but she got hugely mainstream coverage following that primary win. The DNC can't disavow her, so she'll continue to raise mucho dinero for both sides.2001400ex said:
She's not any more vocal that any other candidate. Look at it..... If she didn't win that race, she'd still be doing the same thing but we would never have heard about her. Her voice is loud now because the conservative media is giving her air time. Free pub if you will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh? Call it propaganda if you want, but it's nothing exotic. And by cooperative, I mean that Cortez is very vocal and out there trying to make herself the standard bearer for the nueva Democratic Party. Furthermore, it would be extremely touchy for the DNC to do anything overt to rein her in. Plus she's young and says stupid shit earnestly.2001400ex said:
Isn't saying cooperative boogeywoman implying it takes a propaganda machine? Just saying.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, that's electoral politics. She provides a cooperative boogeywoman to campaign against.2001400ex said:
Only idiots like you and propaganda machines are making her the face of the Democratic party.HoustonHusky said:
She has a BA in "Economics" and "International Relations" and she literally said "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family" . That just skims the surface of her crazy. She didn't say she wanted to replace ICE. She said and ran on the platform of abolishing Ice. She said she wanted to "Re-imagine" a new version.allpurpleallgold said:
Race is somewhat right about Ocasio-Cortez getting a free pub bump. The difference between her pub and Trump’s is Trump gets it for being crazy while Ocasio-Cortez is getting it by being accused of holding crazy positions that she doesn’t actually hold.dnc said:
yesallpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?dnc said:
Querey for APAG and Tommy. As our intelligent bored lefties, can you tell me if this chick is for real or is she just trolling conservatives?HoustonHusky said:Another stellar HondoFS poast...you will see why in a second.
A pertinent quote in the middle of it all..."if you don't pay attention to how they are going to pay for it or the rest of that..."
Her article that sparked it all...a much less flattering description of the event that basically says she sees how the HondoFSs of the world fall for it all. And here comes the man (?) himself on queue to prove her point...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/conservative-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-rally/
On a side note HondoFS...there is a much better twitter handle to follow if you want to follow her...
And the funniest news story of her today...
If she's just trolling I think she's kind of awesome. If she is really spending time and energy to go after Parker Brothers and Taco Bell, W.
JW.
Shes a young female version of HondoFS. There is a reason she was a bartender before she became the face of the new Democratic Party...I guess they are looking for a young, crazy Nancy Pelosi.
And no, her platform isn't my platform. But it is nice that it scares you, Race, sledog, and OBK. Pussies.
And yes she does say a bunch of stupid shit. In a bigger political race, she'll struggle to defend all the stupid shit she says. In her district, its mostly Democrats so they could run a communist and win.
The Dems should be kicking the shit out of the GOP at the mid-terms per the *script but they've got a serious problem in their own tent right now.
I'm pretty sure I'm on record saying that this girl getting elected in the primary was the best thing to happen for the GOP's midterms. Seems like that's how it's playing out to me. She's a great boogeyman that can't just be written off because of who it is she beat.
- Socialism
- Open borders
- Higher taxes
- "Gun control" (the end game here is gun confiscation or blocking gun sales, like socialist utopia Toronto is about to do)
- Restricted speech ('hate speech' laws, also rife in socialist Canada)
- A corrupt FBI/DOJ that they have no intention of investigating
- Racism and identity politics
Meanwhile Trump has been doing the following, among other accomplishments:
- Blitzed the EU and is forcing them to adopt a zero tariff policy
- Taking the offensive against China, building an alliance with other trade partners against them
- Passed tax cuts
- Increased American wealth in the stock market
- Is putting Kim Jong UN in his place
- Destroyed ISIS
Please explain why the fuck these imbeciles should be 'kicking the shit out of the GOP' in November. "Because it's the script," is not an acceptable answer.
You're a pussy and a liar at the same time.
3 other words. -
Name one member of Congress pushing a bill to enforce term limits. This is hardly some socialist conspiracy. But I wouldn’t expect a community college Duck fan to have a sense of the larger historical picture. For anything.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The issue isn't current socialists holding up progress on term limits, it's socialist intentions once they get in power. Socialists don't support term limits. Are you disputing that?ThomasFremont said:
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time
A fucking socialist made a very strong showing in his party's nomination for president, and another socialist took down a major democrat figure. So yeah, it's an issue that deserves attention.
So why don't socialists support term limits? Lets see if you have the balls to answer a question the other tug socialists won't. -
You're struggling with basic reading comprehension and common historical knowledge. You're incapable of defending your movement. And I haven't even really torn into it yet. I'm going to use your movement's own literature against you to expose its true nature. I'm going to run the ball down your throat. You will know its coming and you won't be able to stop it. Because you're simply not equipped to. You should go back to school instead of tangling with someone who has a higher IQ and more knowledge than you. Leave the heavy lifting to APAG.ThomasFremont said:
Name one member of Congress pushing a bill to enforce term limits. This is hardly some socialist conspiracy. But I wouldn’t expect a community college Duck fan to have a sense of the larger historical picture. For anything.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The issue isn't current socialists holding up progress on term limits, it's socialist intentions once they get in power. Socialists don't support term limits. Are you disputing that?ThomasFremont said:
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time
A fucking socialist made a very strong showing in his party's nomination for president, and another socialist took down a major democrat figure. So yeah, it's an issue that deserves attention.
So why don't socialists support term limits? Lets see if you have the balls to answer a question the other tug socialists won't. -
Let me know when this high IQ person shows up. That might be interestingoregonblitzkrieg said:
You're struggling with basic reading comprehension and common historical knowledge. You're incapable of defending your movement. And I haven't even really torn into it yet. I'm going to use your movement's own literature against you to expose its true nature. I'm going to run the ball down your throat. You will know its coming and you won't be able to stop it. Because you're simply not equipped to. You should go back to school instead of tangling with someone who has a higher IQ and more knowledge than you. Leave the heavy lifting to APAG.ThomasFremont said:
Name one member of Congress pushing a bill to enforce term limits. This is hardly some socialist conspiracy. But I wouldn’t expect a community college Duck fan to have a sense of the larger historical picture. For anything.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The issue isn't current socialists holding up progress on term limits, it's socialist intentions once they get in power. Socialists don't support term limits. Are you disputing that?ThomasFremont said:
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time
A fucking socialist made a very strong showing in his party's nomination for president, and another socialist took down a major democrat figure. So yeah, it's an issue that deserves attention.
So why don't socialists support term limits? Lets see if you have the balls to answer a question the other tug socialists won't. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're struggling with basic reading comprehension and common historical knowledge. You're incapable of defending your movement. And I haven't even really torn into it yet. I'm going to use your movement's own literature against you to expose its true nature. I'm going to run the ball down your throat. You will know its coming and you won't be able to stop it. Because you're simply not equipped to. You should go back to school instead of tangling with someone who has a higher IQ and more knowledge than you. Leave the heavy lifting to APAG.
-
Hmmm. So you think the ones that win Congressional elections are the most talented ones? Are you now a parody account too? You should know that both parties require their elected Congress people to spend about 20 hours per week on the phones fund raising for the party and their own re-election campaign. You should also know that most of the bills that Congress people present to the floor were drafted by lobbyists that represent the ones that answered their phone and sent the money to the party. A House member, especially, is a lame duck as soon as they are elected.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better.
Sad you don’t know how our legislative gears are greased. -
Have any studies been done on whether term limits actually curb the abuses you perceive?salemcoog said:Hmmm. So you think the ones that win Congressional elections are the most talented ones? Are you now a parody account too? You should know that both parties require their elected Congress people to spend about 20 hours per week on the phones fund raising for the party and their own re-election campaign. You should also know that most of the bills that Congress people present to the floor were drafted by lobbyists that represent the ones that answered their phone and sent the money to the party. A House member, especially, is a lame duck as soon as they are elected.
Sad you don’t know how our legislative gears are greased.
I mean, the president is subject to a term limit of eight years, and yet those dudes spend a boatload of their time raising money and servicing their financial supporters. -
It's interesting how the socialists want to curb special interest money, but not their own power. Nah, not that. They need that to be unlimited for their agenda to work.
-
You got me. I tried, but I can't fool you.oregonblitzkrieg said:It's interesting how the socialists want to curb special interest money, but not their own power. Nah, not that. They need that to be unlimited for their agenda to work.
-
You need the power to exterminate people that disagree with you. Millions of dead people can't be wrong.oregonblitzkrieg said:It's interesting how the socialists want to curb special interest money, but not their own power. Nah, not that. They need that to be unlimited for their agenda to work.
-
This movement is potentially closer to Nazism than these ignoramuses are probably aware of. Combining socialism with shit like 'racial justice' and 'white privilege,' radical elements of leftist thought, it would be a dictatorship of the 'oppressed victims' exacting their revenge on a country that was founded on racism and white privilege, according to the DSA socialists.Sledog said:
You need the power to exterminate people that disagree with you. Millions of dead people can't be wrong.oregonblitzkrieg said:It's interesting how the socialists want to curb special interest money, but not their own power. Nah, not that. They need that to be unlimited for their agenda to work.
