Trigger warning
Comments
-
Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
The issue isn't current socialists holding up progress on term limits, it's socialist intentions once they get in power. Socialists don't support term limits. Are you disputing that?ThomasFremont said:
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time
A fucking socialist made a very strong showing in his party's nomination for president, and another socialist took down a major democrat figure. So yeah, it's an issue that deserves attention.
So why don't socialists support term limits? Lets see if you have the balls to answer a question the other tug socialists won't. -
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to impose failed systems of government from the 20th century on America.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better.
-
You really shouldn't use words that you don't understandoregonblitzkrieg said:
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to re-impose failed systems of government from the 20th century.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
Still waiting for the revolution of the 'new democrats' who are going to drag the country kicking and screaming into the 21st century.BearsWiin said:
You really shouldn't use words that you don't understandoregonblitzkrieg said:
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to re-impose failed systems of government from the 20th century.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
It's laughable because the pachouli masses are convinced Bernie it an outsider. Fucker's been in congress for 25 years.ThomasFremont said:
It doesn’t because Bernie Sanders is 1 senator out of 100. The implication that he’s responsible for no term limits on congress is laughable.oregonblitzkrieg said:ThomasFremont said:
All the socialists in government are keeping us from establishing term limits!!1!oregonblitzkrieg said:
Term limits have broad support. But for some reason the socialists don't like that idea. I wonder why. The Constitution needs to be amended to put term limits on Congress.2001400ex said:
Why are Republicans against term limits?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nice deflection and evasion. Why are socialists against term limits?allpurpleallgold said:Capitalism hasn’t always existed and will not always exist and America did not begin with a capitalist economy. Those are facts. You’re mad about facts.
This is where we get into the weird worship of capitalism. It has to be unquestioned. We can’t even think about making our country better because we must worship at the alter of capitalism. As I’ve said before, it’s the best system we’ve come up with but not being open to it evolving into a better system is crazy. In 1899 Charles Duell of the US Patent Office said “everything that can be invented has been invented”. That’s what you’re doing here. That’s what you’re saying. Nothing could ever be better than what we have right now. All of human history tells us you’re wrong.
The term limits thing is just weird. You’ve picked up on one point and turned a 28 year old that was a bartender 5 minutes ago and old ass Bernie Sanders into Pinky and the Brain, hell bent on world domination.
Wait...
HTFH.
Also, this is the critical issue of our time -
This and 4 other words are pretty much Fleas entire response vocabulary.dflea said:
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your demwit masters have nothing to run on. Nothing that actually works and hasn't caused catastrophes in other nations throughout history. Case closed. Suck a dick. Burn the fucking script.dflea said:
Yeah except I've never said anything even close to that, you little crying bitch.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dopes like you keep spouting off about how the dems should be crushing it in November. Explain why or shut the fuck up, no one has, you've got nothing, because you know demwit policies are completely fucktarded and you can't defend them. They can't run against Trump's failures, because he's been winning bigly for America in every category.dflea said:
Quit demanding answers for your stupid fucking questions like you're in charge around here you worthless fucking goat.oregonblitzkrieg said:
We've heard this same tired line over and over and over again with ZERO explanation as to why the Demwits should be kicking the shit out of the other party. Demwits support, among other feckless policies:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, if anything I think this hurts the Dems. Progressives can think they are going to win elections by veering far left all they want but there's a reason the Green Party gets shit for votes. It's the same FS thing the bible thumpers think on the Right, "If only we could get a candidate who will impose a Christian Theocracy we could win it all! Why doesn't the GOP see that?"2001400ex said:
See Race. He sounds scared.UW_Doog_Bot said:
She beat Joe Crowley who was the chair of the democratic congress. That's not a minor immaterial thing. She basically replaced one of the standard bearers and heads of the Dems.GrundleStiltzkin said:
But she did win, beating some kinda swinging dick incumbent as I recall. Conservative media is helping fan the flames for their own aims, but she got hugely mainstream coverage following that primary win. The DNC can't disavow her, so she'll continue to raise mucho dinero for both sides.2001400ex said:
She's not any more vocal that any other candidate. Look at it..... If she didn't win that race, she'd still be doing the same thing but we would never have heard about her. Her voice is loud now because the conservative media is giving her air time. Free pub if you will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh? Call it propaganda if you want, but it's nothing exotic. And by cooperative, I mean that Cortez is very vocal and out there trying to make herself the standard bearer for the nueva Democratic Party. Furthermore, it would be extremely touchy for the DNC to do anything overt to rein her in. Plus she's young and says stupid shit earnestly.2001400ex said:
Isn't saying cooperative boogeywoman implying it takes a propaganda machine? Just saying.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, that's electoral politics. She provides a cooperative boogeywoman to campaign against.2001400ex said:
Only idiots like you and propaganda machines are making her the face of the Democratic party.HoustonHusky said:
She has a BA in "Economics" and "International Relations" and she literally said "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family" . That just skims the surface of her crazy. She didn't say she wanted to replace ICE. She said and ran on the platform of abolishing Ice. She said she wanted to "Re-imagine" a new version.allpurpleallgold said:
Race is somewhat right about Ocasio-Cortez getting a free pub bump. The difference between her pub and Trump’s is Trump gets it for being crazy while Ocasio-Cortez is getting it by being accused of holding crazy positions that she doesn’t actually hold.dnc said:
yesallpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?dnc said:
Querey for APAG and Tommy. As our intelligent bored lefties, can you tell me if this chick is for real or is she just trolling conservatives?HoustonHusky said:Another stellar HondoFS poast...you will see why in a second.
A pertinent quote in the middle of it all..."if you don't pay attention to how they are going to pay for it or the rest of that..."
Her article that sparked it all...a much less flattering description of the event that basically says she sees how the HondoFSs of the world fall for it all. And here comes the man (?) himself on queue to prove her point...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/conservative-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-rally/
On a side note HondoFS...there is a much better twitter handle to follow if you want to follow her...
And the funniest news story of her today...
If she's just trolling I think she's kind of awesome. If she is really spending time and energy to go after Parker Brothers and Taco Bell, W.
JW.
Shes a young female version of HondoFS. There is a reason she was a bartender before she became the face of the new Democratic Party...I guess they are looking for a young, crazy Nancy Pelosi.
And no, her platform isn't my platform. But it is nice that it scares you, Race, sledog, and OBK. Pussies.
And yes she does say a bunch of stupid shit. In a bigger political race, she'll struggle to defend all the stupid shit she says. In her district, its mostly Democrats so they could run a communist and win.
The Dems should be kicking the shit out of the GOP at the mid-terms per the *script but they've got a serious problem in their own tent right now.
I'm pretty sure I'm on record saying that this girl getting elected in the primary was the best thing to happen for the GOP's midterms. Seems like that's how it's playing out to me. She's a great boogeyman that can't just be written off because of who it is she beat.
- Socialism
- Open borders
- Higher taxes
- "Gun control" (the end game here is gun confiscation or blocking gun sales, like socialist utopia Toronto is about to do)
- Restricted speech ('hate speech' laws, also rife in socialist Canada)
- A corrupt FBI/DOJ that they have no intention of investigating
- Racism and identity politics
Meanwhile Trump has been doing the following, among other accomplishments:
- Blitzed the EU and is forcing them to adopt a zero tariff policy
- Taking the offensive against China, building an alliance with other trade partners against them
- Passed tax cuts
- Increased American wealth in the stock market
- Is putting Kim Jong UN in his place
- Destroyed ISIS
Please explain why the fuck these imbeciles should be 'kicking the shit out of the GOP' in November. "Because it's the script," is not an acceptable answer.
You're a pussy and a liar at the same time. -
Call me when Republicans pass a bill with term limits. Until then they are just lying to you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Still waiting for the revolution of the 'new democrats' who are going to drag the country kicking and screaming into the 21st century.BearsWiin said:
You really shouldn't use words that you don't understandoregonblitzkrieg said:
Shocked that another democrat (and probably a socialist too) is against term limits. You guys don't want term limits because your party has no intention to adhere to the Constitution. You already don't. You want open borders so you can expand your voter base and give yourselves a permanent majority, like you've done in California, where you're free to fuck everything up with no opposition. Seizing guns in NJ in contradiction to the 2nd amendment. Not respecting the 1st amendment on college campuses, and attempting to create hate speech laws. Socialists don't want term limits because they're totalitarian minded faggots that want to re-impose failed systems of government from the 20th century.BearsWiin said:Term limits are fucking retarded. If somebody is good at their job, and the voters want them there enough to re-elect them, then so be it. Second-term presidents are lame ducks because members of Congress know they'll be there after he/she's out. Why make last-term congressmen lame ducks too? The threat/prospect of re-election is an important element of politics.
We have regular elections. We can impose term limits on anybody whom we see as not up to the job, or there's somebody better. Competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform are much more effective ways of prompting legislators to behave better. -
Go kill yourself.Sledog said:
This and 4 other words are pretty much Fleas entire response vocabulary.dflea said:
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your demwit masters have nothing to run on. Nothing that actually works and hasn't caused catastrophes in other nations throughout history. Case closed. Suck a dick. Burn the fucking script.dflea said:
Yeah except I've never said anything even close to that, you little crying bitch.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dopes like you keep spouting off about how the dems should be crushing it in November. Explain why or shut the fuck up, no one has, you've got nothing, because you know demwit policies are completely fucktarded and you can't defend them. They can't run against Trump's failures, because he's been winning bigly for America in every category.dflea said:
Quit demanding answers for your stupid fucking questions like you're in charge around here you worthless fucking goat.oregonblitzkrieg said:
We've heard this same tired line over and over and over again with ZERO explanation as to why the Demwits should be kicking the shit out of the other party. Demwits support, among other feckless policies:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, if anything I think this hurts the Dems. Progressives can think they are going to win elections by veering far left all they want but there's a reason the Green Party gets shit for votes. It's the same FS thing the bible thumpers think on the Right, "If only we could get a candidate who will impose a Christian Theocracy we could win it all! Why doesn't the GOP see that?"2001400ex said:
See Race. He sounds scared.UW_Doog_Bot said:
She beat Joe Crowley who was the chair of the democratic congress. That's not a minor immaterial thing. She basically replaced one of the standard bearers and heads of the Dems.GrundleStiltzkin said:
But she did win, beating some kinda swinging dick incumbent as I recall. Conservative media is helping fan the flames for their own aims, but she got hugely mainstream coverage following that primary win. The DNC can't disavow her, so she'll continue to raise mucho dinero for both sides.2001400ex said:
She's not any more vocal that any other candidate. Look at it..... If she didn't win that race, she'd still be doing the same thing but we would never have heard about her. Her voice is loud now because the conservative media is giving her air time. Free pub if you will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh? Call it propaganda if you want, but it's nothing exotic. And by cooperative, I mean that Cortez is very vocal and out there trying to make herself the standard bearer for the nueva Democratic Party. Furthermore, it would be extremely touchy for the DNC to do anything overt to rein her in. Plus she's young and says stupid shit earnestly.2001400ex said:
Isn't saying cooperative boogeywoman implying it takes a propaganda machine? Just saying.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, that's electoral politics. She provides a cooperative boogeywoman to campaign against.2001400ex said:
Only idiots like you and propaganda machines are making her the face of the Democratic party.HoustonHusky said:
She has a BA in "Economics" and "International Relations" and she literally said "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family" . That just skims the surface of her crazy. She didn't say she wanted to replace ICE. She said and ran on the platform of abolishing Ice. She said she wanted to "Re-imagine" a new version.allpurpleallgold said:
Race is somewhat right about Ocasio-Cortez getting a free pub bump. The difference between her pub and Trump’s is Trump gets it for being crazy while Ocasio-Cortez is getting it by being accused of holding crazy positions that she doesn’t actually hold.dnc said:
yesallpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?dnc said:
Querey for APAG and Tommy. As our intelligent bored lefties, can you tell me if this chick is for real or is she just trolling conservatives?HoustonHusky said:Another stellar HondoFS poast...you will see why in a second.
A pertinent quote in the middle of it all..."if you don't pay attention to how they are going to pay for it or the rest of that..."
Her article that sparked it all...a much less flattering description of the event that basically says she sees how the HondoFSs of the world fall for it all. And here comes the man (?) himself on queue to prove her point...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/conservative-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-rally/
On a side note HondoFS...there is a much better twitter handle to follow if you want to follow her...
And the funniest news story of her today...
If she's just trolling I think she's kind of awesome. If she is really spending time and energy to go after Parker Brothers and Taco Bell, W.
JW.
Shes a young female version of HondoFS. There is a reason she was a bartender before she became the face of the new Democratic Party...I guess they are looking for a young, crazy Nancy Pelosi.
And no, her platform isn't my platform. But it is nice that it scares you, Race, sledog, and OBK. Pussies.
And yes she does say a bunch of stupid shit. In a bigger political race, she'll struggle to defend all the stupid shit she says. In her district, its mostly Democrats so they could run a communist and win.
The Dems should be kicking the shit out of the GOP at the mid-terms per the *script but they've got a serious problem in their own tent right now.
I'm pretty sure I'm on record saying that this girl getting elected in the primary was the best thing to happen for the GOP's midterms. Seems like that's how it's playing out to me. She's a great boogeyman that can't just be written off because of who it is she beat.
- Socialism
- Open borders
- Higher taxes
- "Gun control" (the end game here is gun confiscation or blocking gun sales, like socialist utopia Toronto is about to do)
- Restricted speech ('hate speech' laws, also rife in socialist Canada)
- A corrupt FBI/DOJ that they have no intention of investigating
- Racism and identity politics
Meanwhile Trump has been doing the following, among other accomplishments:
- Blitzed the EU and is forcing them to adopt a zero tariff policy
- Taking the offensive against China, building an alliance with other trade partners against them
- Passed tax cuts
- Increased American wealth in the stock market
- Is putting Kim Jong UN in his place
- Destroyed ISIS
Please explain why the fuck these imbeciles should be 'kicking the shit out of the GOP' in November. "Because it's the script," is not an acceptable answer.
You're a pussy and a liar at the same time.
3 other words.
-
You missed one.dflea said:
Go kill yourself.Sledog said:
This and 4 other words are pretty much Fleas entire response vocabulary.dflea said:
Pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your demwit masters have nothing to run on. Nothing that actually works and hasn't caused catastrophes in other nations throughout history. Case closed. Suck a dick. Burn the fucking script.dflea said:
Yeah except I've never said anything even close to that, you little crying bitch.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dopes like you keep spouting off about how the dems should be crushing it in November. Explain why or shut the fuck up, no one has, you've got nothing, because you know demwit policies are completely fucktarded and you can't defend them. They can't run against Trump's failures, because he's been winning bigly for America in every category.dflea said:
Quit demanding answers for your stupid fucking questions like you're in charge around here you worthless fucking goat.oregonblitzkrieg said:
We've heard this same tired line over and over and over again with ZERO explanation as to why the Demwits should be kicking the shit out of the other party. Demwits support, among other feckless policies:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, if anything I think this hurts the Dems. Progressives can think they are going to win elections by veering far left all they want but there's a reason the Green Party gets shit for votes. It's the same FS thing the bible thumpers think on the Right, "If only we could get a candidate who will impose a Christian Theocracy we could win it all! Why doesn't the GOP see that?"2001400ex said:
See Race. He sounds scared.UW_Doog_Bot said:
She beat Joe Crowley who was the chair of the democratic congress. That's not a minor immaterial thing. She basically replaced one of the standard bearers and heads of the Dems.GrundleStiltzkin said:
But she did win, beating some kinda swinging dick incumbent as I recall. Conservative media is helping fan the flames for their own aims, but she got hugely mainstream coverage following that primary win. The DNC can't disavow her, so she'll continue to raise mucho dinero for both sides.2001400ex said:
She's not any more vocal that any other candidate. Look at it..... If she didn't win that race, she'd still be doing the same thing but we would never have heard about her. Her voice is loud now because the conservative media is giving her air time. Free pub if you will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Huh? Call it propaganda if you want, but it's nothing exotic. And by cooperative, I mean that Cortez is very vocal and out there trying to make herself the standard bearer for the nueva Democratic Party. Furthermore, it would be extremely touchy for the DNC to do anything overt to rein her in. Plus she's young and says stupid shit earnestly.2001400ex said:
Isn't saying cooperative boogeywoman implying it takes a propaganda machine? Just saying.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, that's electoral politics. She provides a cooperative boogeywoman to campaign against.2001400ex said:
Only idiots like you and propaganda machines are making her the face of the Democratic party.HoustonHusky said:
She has a BA in "Economics" and "International Relations" and she literally said "Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working 60, 70, 80 hours a week and can barely feed their family" . That just skims the surface of her crazy. She didn't say she wanted to replace ICE. She said and ran on the platform of abolishing Ice. She said she wanted to "Re-imagine" a new version.allpurpleallgold said:
Race is somewhat right about Ocasio-Cortez getting a free pub bump. The difference between her pub and Trump’s is Trump gets it for being crazy while Ocasio-Cortez is getting it by being accused of holding crazy positions that she doesn’t actually hold.dnc said:
yesallpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?dnc said:
Querey for APAG and Tommy. As our intelligent bored lefties, can you tell me if this chick is for real or is she just trolling conservatives?HoustonHusky said:Another stellar HondoFS poast...you will see why in a second.
A pertinent quote in the middle of it all..."if you don't pay attention to how they are going to pay for it or the rest of that..."
Her article that sparked it all...a much less flattering description of the event that basically says she sees how the HondoFSs of the world fall for it all. And here comes the man (?) himself on queue to prove her point...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/23/conservative-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-rally/
On a side note HondoFS...there is a much better twitter handle to follow if you want to follow her...
And the funniest news story of her today...
If she's just trolling I think she's kind of awesome. If she is really spending time and energy to go after Parker Brothers and Taco Bell, W.
JW.
Shes a young female version of HondoFS. There is a reason she was a bartender before she became the face of the new Democratic Party...I guess they are looking for a young, crazy Nancy Pelosi.
And no, her platform isn't my platform. But it is nice that it scares you, Race, sledog, and OBK. Pussies.
And yes she does say a bunch of stupid shit. In a bigger political race, she'll struggle to defend all the stupid shit she says. In her district, its mostly Democrats so they could run a communist and win.
The Dems should be kicking the shit out of the GOP at the mid-terms per the *script but they've got a serious problem in their own tent right now.
I'm pretty sure I'm on record saying that this girl getting elected in the primary was the best thing to happen for the GOP's midterms. Seems like that's how it's playing out to me. She's a great boogeyman that can't just be written off because of who it is she beat.
- Socialism
- Open borders
- Higher taxes
- "Gun control" (the end game here is gun confiscation or blocking gun sales, like socialist utopia Toronto is about to do)
- Restricted speech ('hate speech' laws, also rife in socialist Canada)
- A corrupt FBI/DOJ that they have no intention of investigating
- Racism and identity politics
Meanwhile Trump has been doing the following, among other accomplishments:
- Blitzed the EU and is forcing them to adopt a zero tariff policy
- Taking the offensive against China, building an alliance with other trade partners against them
- Passed tax cuts
- Increased American wealth in the stock market
- Is putting Kim Jong UN in his place
- Destroyed ISIS
Please explain why the fuck these imbeciles should be 'kicking the shit out of the GOP' in November. "Because it's the script," is not an acceptable answer.
You're a pussy and a liar at the same time.
3 other words.
