Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Kicker
JaWarrenJaHooker
Member Posts: 2,122
One more year of this shit?
And don’t get me started on punting. Browning was the best one
FYFMFE
Comments
-
Only 1?
-
wat
our Aussie punter was good -
The punting game was on point. Wtf were you watching? Kicking was complete disaster one has strong leg but inconsistent the other is has no fucking leg and should sell his couch
-
IMO if a no-playing fruity kicker misses one FG or PAT in a year then its a disaster. FTA
-
-
PurpleBaze said:
-
GRUNDLE STOpGrundleStiltzkin said: -
FG kicking has a chance to be a major problem
Whitford is just fine as a P -
it'll cost us at least one game this year
-
It cost us the Stanford game, too.BaldwinIV said:it'll cost us at least one game this year
If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.
Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too). -
100% Agree. Made FG continues momentum. Was really a fuck show last year.Dennis_DeYoung said:
It cost us the Stanford game, too.BaldwinIV said:it'll cost us at least one game this year
If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.
Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too). -
Peyton Henry looked better than Soderberg in the spring, which ultimately means nothing.
-
I'll never agree with kicking FG's on 4th and 1 from inside the 20. Don't be soft. Get a yard.Dennis_DeYoung said:
It cost us the Stanford game, too.BaldwinIV said:it'll cost us at least one game this year
If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.
Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too).
We were still up 14-10 at halftime and got the ball first in the second half. -
Unless it’s for the win, or to tie at the end to force OT, agree. FGs are for pussy NFL coaches. If our running game can’t get 1 yard at will, why are we even here?RoadDawg55 said:
I'll never agree with kicking FG's on 4th and 1 from inside the 20. Don't be soft. Get a yard.Dennis_DeYoung said:
It cost us the Stanford game, too.BaldwinIV said:it'll cost us at least one game this year
If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.
Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too).
We were still up 14-10 at halftime and got the ball first in the second half.
