Kicker

JaWarrenJaHooker

One more year of this shit?




And don’t get me started on punting. Browning was the best one



FYFMFE

Mad_Son

Only 1?

Gladstone

wat

our Aussie punter was good

FireCohen

The punting game was on point. Wtf were you watching? Kicking was complete disaster one has strong leg but inconsistent the other is has no fucking leg and should sell his couch

JoeEDangerously

IMO if a no-playing fruity kicker misses one FG or PAT in a year then its a disaster. FTA

PurpleBaze

GrundleStiltzkin

PurpleBaze said:

Pitchfork51

GrundleStiltzkin said:

PurpleBaze said:

GRUNDLE STOp

Tequilla

FG kicking has a chance to be a major problem

Whitford is just fine as a P

BaldwinIV

it'll cost us at least one game this year

Dennis_DeYoung

BaldwinIV said:

it'll cost us at least one game this year

It cost us the Stanford game, too.

If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.

Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too).

Gilbystaint

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BaldwinIV said:

it'll cost us at least one game this year

It cost us the Stanford game, too.

If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.

Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too).

100% Agree. Made FG continues momentum. Was really a fuck show last year.

Rapeculturedawg

Peyton Henry looked better than Soderberg in the spring, which ultimately means nothing.

RoadDawg55

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BaldwinIV said:

it'll cost us at least one game this year

It cost us the Stanford game, too.

If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.

Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too).

I'll never agree with kicking FG's on 4th and 1 from inside the 20. Don't be soft. Get a yard.

We were still up 14-10 at halftime and got the ball first in the second half.

ThomasFremont

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BaldwinIV said:

it'll cost us at least one game this year

It cost us the Stanford game, too.

If we have a big time kicker, we just kick a FG to go up 17-7, we are dominating. No red zone stop for them. No momentum. We go on to win rather easily, say, 34-14.

Instead they tie it and we don’t score again until we are out of the game. Because that’s our safe space (it was vs PSU, too).

I'll never agree with kicking FG's on 4th and 1 from inside the 20. Don't be soft. Get a yard.

We were still up 14-10 at halftime and got the ball first in the second half.

Unless it’s for the win, or to tie at the end to force OT, agree. FGs are for pussy NFL coaches. If our running game can’t get 1 yard at will, why are we even here?