Vegas sure likes our? Dwags
Comments
-
We beat Idaho.Mosster47 said:
What is UW's best win under Peterman? I'll give you a hint; it's super fucking unimpressive.Tequilla said:I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook
GTFO with that shit ...
Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff -
First (WE?) beat Stanford by 17 then we may lose that game? Which one is it MFS?Mosster47 said:
I don't think Oregon is back, but UW has been a paper tiger as much as any team in history the last two years. 2016 you had a schedule so easy you'd have to look at the way back to Oregon's schedule this season to find one easier. UW played two good teams that year and were physically dominated by both.PurpleJ said:
Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.Mosster47 said:
I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.PurpleJ said:I'll take the Oregon spread.
Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.
The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.
The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.
Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.
Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
Last year I thought Stanford and ASU were by far the most physical teams in the conference and both slapped UW around. The ASU/Oregon game with a healthy Herbie was the best comparison to where both programs are; fairly soft, but a 9 or 10 win team in a shit conference. It was Pete's four year plan to lose a Rose Bowl or whatever the shit they called that Penn State game.
This year UW is going to get absolutely bitch slapped up front to start the season, split the Oregon and Stanford games (don't know which will be the L), then lose their bowl game.
I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage. -
Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
-
-
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
-
It's far worse.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Arizona grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
-
I don't see the grandeur. The Ducks have a top 5 pick at QB, a deep but unproven RB stable, a total mystery at WR, great size but average receiving TE core, and ridiculous amount of riches on the O-line.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
The D-line has some promising youth with a 1st round caliber senior. The LB's are experienced with a sure fire NFL player leading the group. The DB's are young but have a crazy amount of depth.
The punter is back, the kicker will be new.
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
-
Uh, which 10 games do you expect to win?Mosster47 said:
I don't see the grandeur. The Ducks have a top 5 pick at QB, a deep but unproven RB stable, a total mystery at WR, great size but average receiving TE core, and ridiculous amount of riches on the O-line.
The D-line has some promising youth with a 1st round caliber senior. The LB's are experienced with a sure fire NFL player leading the group. The DB's are young but have a crazy amount of depth.
The punter is back, the kicker will be new.
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do. -
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3 -
We have a coaching staff that develops players and the best S&C program in the country. You have a Sark.Mosster47 said:
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
HTH -
Oregon had a pretty good thing going.
But finally losing to asu was proof that it's all over. -
All they keep taking about down here is how awesome the roster is. And Herbie (who got bent over by Mountain West).
Like it’s pro sports or something.
Casual fans, especially casual Oregon/Washington fans don’t get how important coaching is until their all world players are down 38-3 and still aren’t getting their reads down. -
JFC. Coaching.actually.mattersMosster47 said:
I don't see the grandeur. The Ducks have a top 5 pick at QB, a deep but unproven RB stable, a total mystery at WR, great size but average receiving TE core, and ridiculous amount of riches on the O-line.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
The D-line has some promising youth with a 1st round caliber senior. The LB's are experienced with a sure fire NFL player leading the group. The DB's are young but have a crazy amount of depth.
The punter is back, the kicker will be new.
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
Hth -
He's right about MW >>>>>>>>>> PACDerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
@TierbsHsotBoobs would have chinned that post -
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3 -
Good teams have physically dominated UW during the Peterman era. Try again with that. Bama looked like they were playing a junior high.whatshouldicareabout said:
We have a coaching staff that develops players and the best S&C program in the country. You have a Sark.Mosster47 said:
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
HTH -
BullshitMosster47 said:
Good teams have physically dominated UW during the Peterman era. Try again with that. Bama looked like they were playing a junior high.whatshouldicareabout said:
We have a coaching staff that develops players and the best S&C program in the country. You have a Sark.Mosster47 said:
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
HTH -
Junior high IN A FOOTBALL STATEMosster47 said:
Good teams have physically dominated UW during the Peterman era. Try again with that. Bama looked like they were playing a junior high.whatshouldicareabout said:
We have a coaching staff that develops players and the best S&C program in the country. You have a Sark.Mosster47 said:
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
HTH -
Chip had a tremendous six year run counting the two bonus years under Helfrich. Outside of that Oregon has been pedestrian. They only had 0, btw.Mosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3 -
Mikey B did have like five 10 win seasons with two conference titles, but still.dnc said:
Chip had a tremendous six year run counting the two bonus years under Helfrich. Outside of that Oregon has been pedestrian. They only had 0, btw.Mosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3 -
So you mean a true freshman QB who isn't ready for D-1 football resulting in the other team's offense getting way more possessions than normal mixed with the said team with young QB not having offensive success could lead to a lopsided game?haie said:All they keep taking about down here is how awesome the roster is. And Herbie (who got bent over by Mountain West).
Like it’s pro sports or something.
Casual fans, especially casual Oregon/Washington fans don’t get how important coaching is until their all world players are down 38-3 and still aren’t getting their reads down.
That is fascinating. I had no idea that could happen. Next you'll tell me a team like Clemson will lose their QB for a week and lose to Syracuse. Maybe something even more outlandish like FSU starting as a top 5 team, lose their QB in the first week and struggle to finish .500. Just a ridiculous premise that never happens, ever. -
Same as Oregon. USC's run was better. By a lotMosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
Bellotti was pedestrian -
Bama worked the Clemson defense and scored two TDs on UWSledog said:
BullshitMosster47 said:
Good teams have physically dominated UW during the Peterman era. Try again with that. Bama looked like they were playing a junior high.whatshouldicareabout said:
We have a coaching staff that develops players and the best S&C program in the country. You have a Sark.Mosster47 said:
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
HTH
Do you ever have a take that doesn't suck? -
Four 10 win seasons and one and a third conference titles, but still.Mosster47 said:
Mikey B did have like five 10 win seasons with two conference titles, but still.dnc said:
Chip had a tremendous six year run counting the two bonus years under Helfrich. Outside of that Oregon has been pedestrian. They only had 0, btw.Mosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
Oregon since 1993 (your stated 25 years):
220-93
6 1/3 conference championships
8 top 10 finishes
5 top 5 finishes
2 Rose Bowl wins
2 Fiesta Bowl wins
No national championships
USC since 1993:
219-84-2
6 1/2 conference titles
9 top 10 finishes
8 top 5 finishes
2 Orange Bowl wins
6 Rose Bowl wins
1 1/2 national championships,
Good job, good effort.
-
Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
Mosster.
Struggling. -
-
He lost to Mack Brown in Los Angeles.dnc said:
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc.
