Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Vegas sure likes our? Dwags

13567…10

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,771
    Mosster47 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I'll take the Oregon spread.

    I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.

    Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.

    The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.

    The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.

    Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.

    Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
    Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,381 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I'll take the Oregon spread.

    I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.

    Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.

    The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.

    The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.

    Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.

    Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    PurpleJ said:

    Mosster47 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I'll take the Oregon spread.

    I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.

    Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.

    The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.

    The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.

    Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.

    Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
    Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.
    I don't think Oregon is back, but UW has been a paper tiger as much as any team in history the last two years. 2016 you had a schedule so easy you'd have to look at the way back to Oregon's schedule this season to find one easier. UW played two good teams that year and were physically dominated by both.

    Last year I thought Stanford and ASU were by far the most physical teams in the conference and both slapped UW around. The ASU/Oregon game with a healthy Herbie was the best comparison to where both programs are; fairly soft, but a 9 or 10 win team in a shit conference. It was Pete's four year plan to lose a Rose Bowl or whatever the shit they called that Penn State game.

    This year UW is going to get absolutely bitch slapped up front to start the season, split the Oregon and Stanford games (don't know which will be the L), then lose their bowl game.

    I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dannarc
    dannarc Member Posts: 2,743
    Mosster47 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Mosster47 said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I'll take the Oregon spread.

    I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.

    Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.

    The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.

    The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.

    Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.

    Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
    Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.
    I don't think Oregon is back, but UW has been a paper tiger as much as any team in history the last two years. 2016 you had a schedule so easy you'd have to look at the way back to Oregon's schedule this season to find one easier. UW played two good teams that year and were physically dominated by both.

    Last year I thought Stanford and ASU were by far the most physical teams in the conference and both slapped UW around. The ASU/Oregon game with a healthy Herbie was the best comparison to where both programs are; fairly soft, but a 9 or 10 win team in a shit conference. It was Pete's four year plan to lose a Rose Bowl or whatever the shit they called that Penn State game.

    This year UW is going to get absolutely bitch slapped up front to start the season, split the Oregon and Stanford games (don't know which will be the L), then lose their bowl game.

    I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage.
    Disagree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited May 2018
    Pitchfork51 said:

    so the most physical teams in the pac both lost to sdsu huh

    Are you surprised? The conference sent a record number of teams to bowls and they won one of them.

    The Mountain West was better than the Pac-12 last year, which is becoming a fairly common occurrence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,222
    I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook

    GTFO with that shit ...

    Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Tequilla said:

    I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook

    GTFO with that shit ...

    Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff

    What is UW's best win under Peterman? I'll give you a hint; it's super fucking unimpressive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter