Doog Recruiting Test: Do you agree?
Comments
-
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.
You’re Dad’s what?Rubberfist said:
6. Kinda guy you’d take home to meet your Dads’Bread said:I am a fan of the 5 star recruit. But I use my own star ranking not the stupid recruiting sites.
So far we have gotten 2 5* recruits under coach pete with Jake Eason and Jake Kizer.
I give 1* for each of the following.
1. Named Jake and will do everything possible to win the game.
2. BIG BACK* and ready to rumble.
3. Attitude and work ethic - everyone should be talking about the difference between highschool Jake and college Jake.
4. Speed, Speed, Speed.
5. This Ones Personal - I think UW will dominate with this TOP stat I made up given to recruits with a unique skills that make them standout.
*or whatever position they play -
Pick another board if you want to bash the kids.DubSixGamer said:
People who posts in tbs forums on HH are fags. Welcome to the club and grab a seat.PurpleJ said:Write in - Question is irrelevant because people who follow recruiting are FAGS and Stan Emptermman was a 2* try hard white guy. Case closed! WOOF!
-
I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy. -
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.
Fucking kill yourself.animate said:I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy. -
You want my 10.95 first?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fucking kill yourself.animate said:I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy. -
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.
Maseratis don't replace themselves.animate said:
You want my 10.95 first?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fucking kill yourself.animate said:I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy. -
Step up your insurance to Hagerty, and they do.Swaye said:
Maseratis don't replace themselves.animate said:
You want my 10.95 first?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fucking kill yourself.animate said:I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy. -
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.
Preferably paid up for 12 months!!!animate said:
You want my 10.95 first?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fucking kill yourself.animate said:I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy. -
Damn, that's expensive for self immolation.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Preferably paid up for 12 months!!!animate said:
You want my 10.95 first?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fucking kill yourself.animate said:I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy.
My position still stands Dennis.
Cardboard Pete + try hard white guys + some Lawrence Phillips types = natty!
Trust the coaches. Don't fight it... feel it.
-
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.
Fuck the coaches. No one is winning a natty with try hards you fucking idiots.animate said:
Damn, that's expensive for self immolation.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Preferably paid up for 12 months!!!animate said:
You want my 10.95 first?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fucking kill yourself.animate said:I don't know about the pole. Sounds like dance viewable from gyno-row.
But.
This what I want.
- if the coaches can make an efficient use of resources and find "3 star" rated players that have 5 star potential and talent? Fuck yeah. Get them.
- if the coaches identify 5 star talent like a ngata and have a realistic chance of getting them? Then fuck yeah, go for it. Good for pub and football elitism and Rep.
At the end of the day, win on the field and gather talented coaches that can recruit (and pay them too) - then recruiting will take care of itself.
Not worried at all.
It's like that other thread where you have a comparison between donte from Oregon showing off his grill... And lake showing off his nfl players. If the kids are more impressed by Golden teeth then fuck em.
Let the kids that want to be recruited that have no fucking clue what's important for them - let them go. Chances are they're potentially more trouble than they are worth.
Unless it's strategic value to add valuable fast strategy players.
I mean, even the Nebraska teams had guys like Lawrence Phillips. The ultimate fast strategy guy.
My position still stands Dennis.
Cardboard Pete + try hard white guys + some Lawrence Phillips types = natty!
Trust the coaches. Don't fight it... feel it.
