Doog Recruiting Test: Do you agree?

Dennis_DeYoung

"Everyone gets your argument, if you sign 5 stars you win. Here’s a reality check - that won’t happen here. This coaching staff is about developing talent, not relying on natural ability from the truly elite athletes in the country to make them look good. There is a reason Chris Petersen has developed so many 3* guys into NFL prospects."

Swaye

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

I answered no because I didn't want to be a fuckbag.

DubSixGamer

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

If he can develop and get 3 stars to the pros imagine what he and the staff can do with 5 stars? National Championship anyone? #FoodForThought #WeWant5Stars

NorwegianHusky

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

I voted no because every time someone even less statistically literate than me unironically says that star ratings don't matter I wish I had the ability to reach through my computer screen and rip their spine out of their neck like the Predator.

Your average star rating matters. Yes, evaluating and developing is also important, but the blue chip ratio is a real thing.

AEB

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

Being held to winning standards is the minimum you should expect for making 4-5mm/year

CheersWestDawg

When a coach gets fired in mid-February after a bad signing day, I'll give a shit about TBSing.

Until then, forget it. It's only part of the total function of winning.

Winning is one third talent, one third development, one third scheming/Gameday decisions, etc.

haie

Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.

Whyte Viking

Rubberfist

Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.

#EverythingMatters

PurpleJ

Write in - Question is irrelevant because people who follow recruiting are FAGS and Stan Emptermman was a 2* try hard white guy. Case closed! WOOF!

DoogCourics

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

I said no because I enjoy watching awesome things get super awesome.

But I wanted to say yes because it’s doog shit and free pub.

CuntWaffle

Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.

Christ

DubSixGamer

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

CheersWestDawg said:

When a coach gets fired in mid-February after a bad signing day, I'll give a shit about TBSing.

Until then, forget it. It's only part of the total function of winning.

Winning is one third talent, one third development, one third scheming/Gameday decisions, etc.

Different sport I know but Lorenzo Romar?

DubSixGamer

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

PurpleJ said:

Write in - Question is irrelevant because people who follow recruiting are FAGS and Stan Emptermman was a 2* try hard white guy. Case closed! WOOF!

People who posts in tbs forums on HH are fags. Welcome to the club and grab a seat.

Meek

I'm always happy for our? guys who make it to the NFL but my priority is to have the Dawgs be a national championship contender so I'll go for the 5 star guys who can help us win.

Tequilla

No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.

I’m somewhere in between ... we likely will never have a class full of 5 stars

What is very possible is to get classes that have characteristics of competing at the highest level, where we ultimately do develop players into stars, etc

whatshouldicareabout

Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.

also this

bananasnblondes

I'm abstaining because the premise that the original quote is based on is complete bullshit. Recruiting has improved every year under Petersen and he has clearly put an emphasis on it with his coaching and wardrobe changes.

That being said, I dont give a fuck how many guys go to the NFL. Our entire team could declare for ISIS after graduation and I wouldn't care as long as they won a national championship.

Doogles

Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.

I forget the magic ratio number of 4/5 stars it takes to win a natty if someone wants to link the article, but isn't Pete trending up and about to surpass it? Are we not about to be one of 15 schools that make the cut?

Petes 3 stars aren't limping into the NFL in the late rounds. They are generally going top two rounds. That's talent bitch.

whuggy

5 star talent is great but typically comes with some baggage. These players have always been the best but being god given their work et

Doogles said:

I forget the magic ratio number of 4/5 stars it takes to win a natty if someone wants to link the article, but isn't Pete trending up and about to surpass it? Are we not about to be one of 15 schools that make the cut?

Petes 3 stars aren't limping into the NFL in the late rounds. They are generally going top two rounds. That's talent bitch.

You have to be a top 15 recruiter to have any kind of chance. Also if you are in that 11-15 group you better have a transcendant QB or you are fucked. Bama can win with shit QB's because they are good everywhere else. Petersen is trending us into that 10-15 level but after Eason we are going to have to hit homeruns with QB play because we have never been serious players for the 5 stars and that is unlikely to change. You might get one every 3 or 4 years but there are about 8 elite programs that battle it out for the studs.

[Deleted User]

whatshouldicareabout said:

Youshouldcareabout getting an avatar. It should contain all pertinent information a sex offender would provide for their risk assessment. This is necessary to protect our credibility with the youngins who read these threads for the reliable information we provide.

In conclusion to my thorough investigation, you've been here since December 2013. The fact that you have been able to roam freely for such an extensive period of time is at least criminal and at worst unnecessary.

Doogles

Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.

whuggy said:

5 star talent is great but typically comes with some baggage. These players have always been the best but being god given their work et

Doogles said:

I forget the magic ratio number of 4/5 stars it takes to win a natty if someone wants to link the article, but isn't Pete trending up and about to surpass it? Are we not about to be one of 15 schools that make the cut?

Petes 3 stars aren't limping into the NFL in the late rounds. They are generally going top two rounds. That's talent bitch.

You have to be a top 15 recruiter to have any kind of chance. Also if you are in that 11-15 group you better have a transcendant QB or you are fucked. Bama can win with shit QB's because they are good everywhere else. Petersen is trending us into that 10-15 level but after Eason we are going to have to hit homeruns with QB play because we have never been serious players for the 5 stars and that is unlikely to change. You might get one every 3 or 4 years but there are about 8 elite programs that battle it out for the studs.

So same as it ever was. And UW historically can get big time QBs. Eason, Yankoff, Sirmon, Morris, and most likely Huard are all in the pipeline. QB play is trending nicely.

It sucks that our good QB is really shitty when it matters. If this team had Mcsorely I would bet we'd have a chance to win it all. We're right there, even Grandpa Sankey can see it.