Doog Recruiting Test: Do you agree?
Comments
-
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.
Different sport I know but Lorenzo Romar?CheersWestDawg said:When a coach gets fired in mid-February after a bad signing day, I'll give a shit about TBSing.
Until then, forget it. It's only part of the total function of winning.
Winning is one third talent, one third development, one third scheming/Gameday decisions, etc. -
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.
People who posts in tbs forums on HH are fags. Welcome to the club and grab a seat.PurpleJ said:Write in - Question is irrelevant because people who follow recruiting are FAGS and Stan Emptermman was a 2* try hard white guy. Case closed! WOOF!
-
I'm always happy for our? guys who make it to the NFL but my priority is to have the Dawgs be a national championship contender so I'll go for the 5 star guys who can help us win.
-
No - I actually want us to win, not just to make losing feel like winning.I’m somewhere in between ... we likely will never have a class full of 5 stars
What is very possible is to get classes that have characteristics of competing at the highest level, where we ultimately do develop players into stars, etc -
Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.

also this
-
I'm abstaining because the premise that the original quote is based on is complete bullshit. Recruiting has improved every year under Petersen and he has clearly put an emphasis on it with his coaching and wardrobe changes.
That being said, I dont give a fuck how many guys go to the NFL. Our entire team could declare for ISIS after graduation and I wouldn't care as long as they won a national championship. -
Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.I forget the magic ratio number of 4/5 stars it takes to win a natty if someone wants to link the article, but isn't Pete trending up and about to surpass it? Are we not about to be one of 15 schools that make the cut?
Petes 3 stars aren't limping into the NFL in the late rounds. They are generally going top two rounds. That's talent bitch. -
5 star talent is great but typically comes with some baggage. These players have always been the best but being god given their work et
You have to be a top 15 recruiter to have any kind of chance. Also if you are in that 11-15 group you better have a transcendant QB or you are fucked. Bama can win with shit QB's because they are good everywhere else. Petersen is trending us into that 10-15 level but after Eason we are going to have to hit homeruns with QB play because we have never been serious players for the 5 stars and that is unlikely to change. You might get one every 3 or 4 years but there are about 8 elite programs that battle it out for the studs.Doogles said:I forget the magic ratio number of 4/5 stars it takes to win a natty if someone wants to link the article, but isn't Pete trending up and about to surpass it? Are we not about to be one of 15 schools that make the cut?
Petes 3 stars aren't limping into the NFL in the late rounds. They are generally going top two rounds. That's talent bitch. -
whatshouldicareabout said:

Youshouldcareabout getting an avatar. It should contain all pertinent information a sex offender would provide for their risk assessment. This is necessary to protect our credibility with the youngins who read these threads for the reliable information we provide.
In conclusion to my thorough investigation, you've been here since December 2013. The fact that you have been able to roam freely for such an extensive period of time is at least criminal and at worst unnecessary. -
Yes - I'm a low standards fuckbag Doog and I deserve Owens.
So same as it ever was. And UW historically can get big time QBs. Eason, Yankoff, Sirmon, Morris, and most likely Huard are all in the pipeline. QB play is trending nicely.whuggy said:5 star talent is great but typically comes with some baggage. These players have always been the best but being god given their work et
You have to be a top 15 recruiter to have any kind of chance. Also if you are in that 11-15 group you better have a transcendant QB or you are fucked. Bama can win with shit QB's because they are good everywhere else. Petersen is trending us into that 10-15 level but after Eason we are going to have to hit homeruns with QB play because we have never been serious players for the 5 stars and that is unlikely to change. You might get one every 3 or 4 years but there are about 8 elite programs that battle it out for the studs.Doogles said:I forget the magic ratio number of 4/5 stars it takes to win a natty if someone wants to link the article, but isn't Pete trending up and about to surpass it? Are we not about to be one of 15 schools that make the cut?
Petes 3 stars aren't limping into the NFL in the late rounds. They are generally going top two rounds. That's talent bitch.
It sucks that our good QB is really shitty when it matters. If this team had Mcsorely I would bet we'd have a chance to win it all. We're right there, even Grandpa Sankey can see it.





