Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
UW QB depth.....
Comments
-
Eason and Browning are comparable to BJH and Brunell, though not as athletic, will shatter both those guys in terms of numbers. Yankee and Sirmon are much better than huard-bjornson....now throw in Haener and DBG, (who will leave but is still on spring roster) which was the criteria, it aint fucking close!!!! Sinking in yet new fish?YellowSnow said:
"Newbie" my ass, Pops. My husky credentials are as solid as anyone here.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Not even close yella. Sorry newbie. 91-92 didnt have Sirmon and Yerkoff in the 'depth"YellowSnow said:It's Hobert and Brunell in 1992 until proven fucking otherwise. That was peak UW QB depth.
Sirmon and Yerkoff are hot shot, stud HS QBs. They haven't done shit in college, however. Hobert and Brunell were coming off a Natty/ Rose Bowl with a future NFLer as the 3rd string. 3 future NFL QB's >>>>>>>>>> theoretical, but unproven greatness with our 2018 - 19 depth.
Stick to the criteria I laid out in thread we are not comparing starters (bjh-brunell) to fucking true freshmen...come on yeller. Again, not a close comparison. Let me reiterate, d Huard was a crappy college qb who had a decent senior year. Bjornson? No comment needed. Strong ass arm but moved to WR for 2 reasons im sure you don't know of... -
Fuck stats. Cyler Miles had better stats than 92 QB's did and surely you're not arguing he's a better QB. It's a different era.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Eason and Browning are comparable to BJH and Brunell, though not as athletic, will shatter both those guys in terms of numbers. Yankee and Sirmon are much better than huard-bjornson....now throw in Haener and DBG, (who will leave but is still on spring roster) which was the criteria, it aint fucking close!!!! Sinking in yet new fish?YellowSnow said:
"Newbie" my ass, Pops. My husky credentials are as solid as anyone here.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Not even close yella. Sorry newbie. 91-92 didnt have Sirmon and Yerkoff in the 'depth"YellowSnow said:It's Hobert and Brunell in 1992 until proven fucking otherwise. That was peak UW QB depth.
Sirmon and Yerkoff are hot shot, stud HS QBs. They haven't done shit in college, however. Hobert and Brunell were coming off a Natty/ Rose Bowl with a future NFLer as the 3rd string. 3 future NFL QB's >>>>>>>>>> theoretical, but unproven greatness with our 2018 - 19 depth.
Stick to the criteria I laid out in thread we are not comparing starters (bjh-brunell) to fucking true freshmen...come on yeller. Again, not a close comparison. Let me reiterate, d Huard was a crappy college qb who had a decent senior year. Bjornson? No comment needed. Strong ass arm but moved to WR for 2 reasons im sure you don't know of...
Browning is not nearly as good as Brunell or Hobert. He's basically Huard.
Hobert and Brunell are more than likely the best two QB's of the entire group, which makes 92 the best QB collection. If and when Sirmon, Yankoff or Eason surpass one of those two then we can talk. I love their potential too. But that's all it is right now. -
-
It's fine to project pumpster. I think this could turn out to be the best depth chart at QB too. Thats a lot if fucking talent. I'm just not sure yet.
