Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hillary news that doogie missed
Comments
-
There's plenty of things to bag on the Clinton's and Clinton foundation. You don't have to make sure up.pawz said:
If it weren't so fucking pathetic, it would be amusing that you try to play the middle road. You can't unmake your bed now.2001400ex said:
Again your news source is lying to you.Sledog said:
Or the book cooker is lying. Works both ways. Any IRS audits? Any charity delivering a whopping 6% of donations to the people being helped is obviously highly efficient.2001400ex said:
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.HoustonHusky said:Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
Don't get me wrong, the Clinton foundation is about enriching the Clinton's. But the shit you say is just fucktarded.
#aclockworkshill
As an aside. Sledogs newsmax shitpost got me thinking. They actually fired the auditor (PWC) after the 2015 audit. 2016 was the first year Cohn did the audit. It's very rare huge organizations like that change auditors from the big 4 firms. -
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
-
Damn phone!Sledog said:To many to post just Google it for yourself
-
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path. -
Not as fucktarded as your defense of them.2001400ex said:
Again your news source is lying to you.Sledog said:
Or the book cooker is lying. Works both ways. Any IRS audits? Any charity delivering a whopping 6% of donations to the people being helped is obviously highly efficient.2001400ex said:
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.HoustonHusky said:Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
Don't get me wrong, the Clinton foundation is about enriching the Clinton's. But the shit you say is just fucktarded. -
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.2001400ex said:
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
-
Yes I know what an opinion means and I'm a CPA lol. So yes I know the shit that goes on and is undetected. I've seen $600k casino thefts. I was actually involved in this (although that had nothing to do with the audit).PurpleThrobber said:
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.2001400ex said:
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
https://www.ocregister.com/2007/08/14/soboba-casino-heist-suspect-says-cocaine-made-him-do-it/
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first. -
$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front. -
Now we are getting somewhere. What money are the Clinton's laundering? I mean what is the underlying funds they are laundering and the purpose of laundering it?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
I'm genuinely curious. -
Now why would I out my cash cow?
Go find your own money to wash. -
Oh I see. It was the butler with the candlestick.PurpleThrobber said:Now why would I out my cash cow?
Go find your own money to wash. -
Gee golly well if the Democrats said so!
-
The bribe money goes into the Clinton foundation and out to pay the coconspirators. They handle the payoffs not money laundering in the classic sense. HTH2001400ex said:
Now we are getting somewhere. What money are the Clinton's laundering? I mean what is the underlying funds they are laundering and the purpose of laundering it?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
I'm genuinely curious. -
Hey Moron...they don’t have to launder anything. The charity is the slush fund. They have a charity that doesn’t do much charitable activities, and instead funds their opulent lifestyle (flying, dinners, lodging, etc) in the name of “charity”.2001400ex said:
Now we are getting somewhere. What money are the Clinton's laundering? I mean what is the underlying funds they are laundering and the purpose of laundering it?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
I'm genuinely curious.
Or, as a Clinton aide famously said about Chelsea:
“The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents..."
"I hope that you will speak to her and end this," -
That's not money laundering in any sense. Dumbass.Sledog said:
The bribe money goes into the Clinton foundation and out to pay the coconspirators. They handle the payoffs not money laundering in the classic sense. HTH2001400ex said:
Now we are getting somewhere. What money are the Clinton's laundering? I mean what is the underlying funds they are laundering and the purpose of laundering it?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
I'm genuinely curious. -
If an investigation into something made you guilty.....I think you'd have a different opinion of Trump.HoustonHusky said:
Hey Moron...they don’t have to launder anything. The charity is the slush fund. They have a charity that doesn’t do much charitable activities, and instead funds their opulent lifestyle (flying, dinners, lodging, etc) in the name of “charity”.2001400ex said:
Now we are getting somewhere. What money are the Clinton's laundering? I mean what is the underlying funds they are laundering and the purpose of laundering it?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
I'm genuinely curious.
Or, as a Clinton aide famously said about Chelsea:
“The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents..."
"I hope that you will speak to her and end this," -
Lets “reach”for a second and assume the promised $100+MM donation to the “charity” to be used by the Clintons to fund their lifestyle was given directly for influencing Hillary’s decision on Uranium One...is that $100+MM a legal payment? If not, only HondoFS would argue that it somehow isn’t “the act of concealing the transformation of profits from illegal activities and corruption into ostensibly "legitimate" assets”2001400ex said:
That's not money laundering in any sense. Dumbass.Sledog said:
The bribe money goes into the Clinton foundation and out to pay the coconspirators. They handle the payoffs not money laundering in the classic sense. HTH2001400ex said:
Now we are getting somewhere. What money are the Clinton's laundering? I mean what is the underlying funds they are laundering and the purpose of laundering it?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
I'm genuinely curious.
HondoFS... -
That is fucking awesome. Robbing a casino to get money for blow. I am now in my planning phase.2001400ex said:
Yes I know what an opinion means and I'm a CPA lol. So yes I know the shit that goes on and is undetected. I've seen $600k casino thefts. I was actually involved in this (although that had nothing to do with the audit).PurpleThrobber said:
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.2001400ex said:
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
https://www.ocregister.com/2007/08/14/soboba-casino-heist-suspect-says-cocaine-made-him-do-it/
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first. -
The Throbber is a CFA?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
That would qualify The Throbber as one of the smartest guys on the Bored. -
So the other thing we learned from this thread, is that HondoFS is such a successful CPA he needs to supplement his income by posting on this bored for the Clinton's.
#aclockworkshill -
That wasn't already evident?pawz said:
The Throbber is a CFA?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
That would qualify The Throbber as one of the smartest guys on the Bored.
-
You had clearly separated yourself from the pack.PurpleThrobber said:
That wasn't already evident?pawz said:
The Throbber is a CFA?PurpleThrobber said:$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
That would qualify The Throbber as one of the smartest guys on the Bored.
Now answer the question!!1! -
Yeah that robbery was crazy. Just straight up walked out of the front door of the casino like in oceans 11. When you go do it, here's a little bit of advice. Put a little more planning into the escape than they did and wait until you get to South America to buy some blow. It's more pure down there anyway.Swaye said:
That is fucking awesome. Robbing a casino to get money for blow. I am now in my planning phase.2001400ex said:
Yes I know what an opinion means and I'm a CPA lol. So yes I know the shit that goes on and is undetected. I've seen $600k casino thefts. I was actually involved in this (although that had nothing to do with the audit).PurpleThrobber said:
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.2001400ex said:
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
https://www.ocregister.com/2007/08/14/soboba-casino-heist-suspect-says-cocaine-made-him-do-it/
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first. -
Let's be clear...when I do my heist I'm sure I'll be drunk, and probably pass out in the getaway car. I hear they have computers in library prisons now. I'll post from there.2001400ex said:
Yeah that robbery was crazy. Just straight up walked out of the front door of the casino like in oceans 11. When you go do it, here's a little bit of advice. Put a little more planning into the escape than they did and wait until you get to South America to buy some blow. It's more pure down there anyway.Swaye said:
That is fucking awesome. Robbing a casino to get money for blow. I am now in my planning phase.2001400ex said:
Yes I know what an opinion means and I'm a CPA lol. So yes I know the shit that goes on and is undetected. I've seen $600k casino thefts. I was actually involved in this (although that had nothing to do with the audit).PurpleThrobber said:
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.2001400ex said:
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
https://www.ocregister.com/2007/08/14/soboba-casino-heist-suspect-says-cocaine-made-him-do-it/
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first. -
Fuck I was hoping to get a cut for the idea.Swaye said:
Let's be clear...when I do my heist I'm sure I'll be drunk, and probably pass out in the getaway car. I hear they have computers in library prisons now. I'll post from there.2001400ex said:
Yeah that robbery was crazy. Just straight up walked out of the front door of the casino like in oceans 11. When you go do it, here's a little bit of advice. Put a little more planning into the escape than they did and wait until you get to South America to buy some blow. It's more pure down there anyway.Swaye said:
That is fucking awesome. Robbing a casino to get money for blow. I am now in my planning phase.2001400ex said:
Yes I know what an opinion means and I'm a CPA lol. So yes I know the shit that goes on and is undetected. I've seen $600k casino thefts. I was actually involved in this (although that had nothing to do with the audit).PurpleThrobber said:
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.2001400ex said:
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
https://www.ocregister.com/2007/08/14/soboba-casino-heist-suspect-says-cocaine-made-him-do-it/
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first. -
Can confirm this is accurateSwaye said:
Let's be clear...when I do my heist I'm sure I'll be drunk, and probably pass out in the getaway car. I hear they have computers in library prisons now. I'll post from there.2001400ex said:
Yeah that robbery was crazy. Just straight up walked out of the front door of the casino like in oceans 11. When you go do it, here's a little bit of advice. Put a little more planning into the escape than they did and wait until you get to South America to buy some blow. It's more pure down there anyway.Swaye said:
That is fucking awesome. Robbing a casino to get money for blow. I am now in my planning phase.2001400ex said:
Yes I know what an opinion means and I'm a CPA lol. So yes I know the shit that goes on and is undetected. I've seen $600k casino thefts. I was actually involved in this (although that had nothing to do with the audit).PurpleThrobber said:
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.2001400ex said:
Go there. What are you getting at?PurpleThrobber said:
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.2001400ex said:
Cohn Reznik. Are you that fucking stupid or just playing dumb?Sledog said:
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
https://www.ocregister.com/2007/08/14/soboba-casino-heist-suspect-says-cocaine-made-him-do-it/
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first.
