PM to Greg Gaines

You know what to do. No mercy.

Comments
-
I just want a good clean Spring game with 1 injury.
-
-
Look what you have created Derek
-
Four posts in... and this thread is delivering like UPS.
-
-
till now. Where’s Billy Joe on this roster?PurpleBaze said: -
I’m hearing true frosh QBs can’t ever win in the CFB playoffs.
-
I never called for injuries, however with browning we will always have a very low ceiling. The floor won't be super low either though
-
Brunell was damn good. Remember the Huskeis only won one poll -- Miami won the other. With Brunell at the controls *we may have fucking won both, instead of Billy Joe Camaro. Brunell had mobility BJ didn't...
-
Also I object to hoping a player gets injured, although that is too puritanical for this shithole (in the most trumpian sense) bored.
-
There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
-
Nebraska would have been about the same but the Cal game would have been a beatdown instead of contest. Cal was the only team that year that put up a real fight that team.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
-
I dint buy this narrative. It’s probable we lose that game without Hobert but I can’t get down with zero chance.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
I agree the qb switch was for the best though. -
Maybe TTJ = BJH? No wonder then with Brunell it would have been "zero chance."dnc said:
I dint buy this narrative. It’s probable we lose that game without Hobert but I can’t get down with zero chance.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
I agree the qb switch was for the best though. -
There is an argument that, with Brunell at the controls, the Huskies would never have fallen into a 12-point hole by the late 3rd quarter. There may be some truth to that. Who knows?dnc said:
I dint buy this narrative. It’s probable we lose that game without Hobert but I can’t get down with zero chance.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
I agree the qb switch was for the best though.
But a 27-unanswered-point rally in the final 16 minutes, in a hostile environment, against a team bound for the Orange Bowl? Brunell wasn't gonna do that. Hobert did that shit by sheer force of will.
-
agreeTTJ said:
There is an argument that, with Brunell at the controls, the Huskies would never have fallen into a 12-point hole by the late 3rd quarter. There may be some truth to that. Who knows?dnc said:
I dint buy this narrative. It’s probable we lose that game without Hobert but I can’t get down with zero chance.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
I agree the qb switch was for the best though.
But a 27-unanswered-point rally in the final 16 minutes, in a hostile environment, against a team bound for the Orange Bowl? Brunell wasn't gonna do that. Hobert did that shit by sheer force of will.
-
Never noticed how Spacey is looking at them lustfully. Those brass balls must be underaged.TTJ said:
There is an argument that, with Brunell at the controls, the Huskies would never have fallen into a 12-point hole by the late 3rd quarter. There may be some truth to that. Who knows?dnc said:
I dint buy this narrative. It’s probable we lose that game without Hobert but I can’t get down with zero chance.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
I agree the qb switch was for the best though.
But a 27-unanswered-point rally in the final 16 minutes, in a hostile environment, against a team bound for the Orange Bowl? Brunell wasn't gonna do that. Hobert did that shit by sheer force of will. -
Hi @CokeGreaterThanPepsi!!dnc said:
Never noticed how Spacey is looking at them lustfully. Those brass balls must be underaged.TTJ said:
There is an argument that, with Brunell at the controls, the Huskies would never have fallen into a 12-point hole by the late 3rd quarter. There may be some truth to that. Who knows?dnc said:
I dint buy this narrative. It’s probable we lose that game without Hobert but I can’t get down with zero chance.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
I agree the qb switch was for the best though.
But a 27-unanswered-point rally in the final 16 minutes, in a hostile environment, against a team bound for the Orange Bowl? Brunell wasn't gonna do that. Hobert did that shit by sheer force of will. -
I met this POS in person. He put his arm around me. To this day, I still wonder if he wiped a booger on me. Also, I am ashamed.WilburHooksHands said:
Hi @CokeGreaterThanPepsi!!dnc said:
Never noticed how Spacey is looking at them lustfully. Those brass balls must be underaged.TTJ said:
There is an argument that, with Brunell at the controls, the Huskies would never have fallen into a 12-point hole by the late 3rd quarter. There may be some truth to that. Who knows?dnc said:
I dint buy this narrative. It’s probable we lose that game without Hobert but I can’t get down with zero chance.TTJ said:There is exactly zero chance Brunell escapes Lincoln with a win. No Hobert, no hardware.
I agree the qb switch was for the best though.
But a 27-unanswered-point rally in the final 16 minutes, in a hostile environment, against a team bound for the Orange Bowl? Brunell wasn't gonna do that. Hobert did that shit by sheer force of will.