Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Peterson: Better or Worse than Sark

DoogieMcDoogerson
Member Posts: 2,509
Comments
-
DowngradeI don't want any coach who managed to lose to Ty and Sark.
-
UpgradeLet's be real, he's a huge upgrade.
-
UpgradeI don't think he's interested ... I feel he's an upgrade ... But so is a monkey. I am not a huge Petersen fan.
-
UpgradeFuck Tui would be an upgrade. That's how shitty Sark is. Peterson doesn't interest me.
-
UpgradeDon't get the Petersen hate. Ever see Boise's recruit rankings? Don't think he leaves Boise for any job but he's a terrific coach.
-
UpgradeAgreed.
Peterson's concern is Hawkins and that other BS fuckwad.
Maybe Mark Few in disguise.
Still better than Sark though.fivehundredmileDAWG said:I don't think he's interested ... I feel he's an upgrade ... But so is a monkey. I am not a huge Petersen fan.
-
UpgradeI would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
-
UpgradeSomething about Petersen doesn't sit right with me.
But his players love him - long after their BSU tenure. Players get better through the program as well. Something we've all longed for many moons... -
Upgrade
Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.dnc said:I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
-
Upgrade
Better hire than Sark was, IMO. Not a homerun hire, more like a solid B. Sark was C-, at best.Mad_Son said:
Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.dnc said:I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
-
Upgrade
I agree he is better than Sark, I just think I'd feel about the same since I am less optimistic now. Additionally Sark was much more of an unknown. I have seen a lot of Peterson and I think I have a better sense of what he does.dnc said:
Better hire than Sark was, IMO. Not a homerun hire, more like a solid B. Sark was C-, at best.Mad_Son said:
Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.dnc said:I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
-
UpgradeHe's an upgrade but Sark was an upgrade over Ty.
Just because you are an upgrade over a fucking turd doesn't mean you are good either. -
Upgrade
#IncrementalProgressHe_Needs_More_Time said:He's an upgrade but Sark was an upgrade over Ty.
Just because you are an upgrade over a fucking turd doesn't mean you are good either.
-
Where is the field? Is a rabbit pellet shit or a log crap better...the idea of both is to get them out of my system.
-
UpgradeData: ( Yes, I know their conference sucks )
http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/mountainwest/boise_state/2010-2014_yearly_results.php
and
http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/mountainwest/boise_state/2005-2009_yearly_results.php
I think it would be a substantial upgrade. -
UpgradeSark had as much head coaching experience as woody has heterosexual intercourse