Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sarkisian: 2012 Huskies couldn't overcome the youth factor
Comments
-
ASL?CheersWestDawg said:
Wanna cyber?NorthLakeDub said:
I figured out the inside joke. You don't talk about football, you guys jerk each other off all day.CheersWestDawg said:
Don't be such a vag about it. Form a compelling argument about why Sark should keep his job. I'll grant you that you won't get a lot of people on this board to change their mind, but the more you flip out about it, the more retarded you're going to look. Just try to figure out some of the inside jokes, don't take the people here (or yourself) too seriously, and if Sark wins the fucking Rose Bowl next year you can tell is all about how right you were on January 2nd, 2014. If you can't handle it, go over to Dawgman and pay $120/year for Kim's opinions and narcissism.NorthLakeDub said:
No disrespect to the owner of this website, because I like the content in the articles you have posted.CheersWestDawg said:
SAY IT TO HIS FACE!1!1!1!1!1!!!1!!!1!1!RaceBannon said:NorthLakeDub is sure a cunt
But from what I've seen so far, this board is fucking pathetic. It's basically like the same 5 or 10 guys saying the same fucking thing over and over and over and over. Fire Sark. Talk about beating a dead horse... Just keep talking about how much Sark sucks. I swear that's pretty much the only thing I've ever read from a lot of the posters on this board. -
racistNorthLakeDub said:
I bet you fuck your ugly wife's fat cuntRaceBannon said:NorthLakeDub is sure a cunt
-
-
You showed weakness. For that, you must die. #LordoftheFlies
-
I went back through the thread to see NorthLake's points. It was all doog shit we have seen a million times before.
"This is a new era for Husky football with the new stadium."
"Just because we have sucked the past few years doesn't mean we will this year."
"I think Sark is the guy because I think he's the guy. You guys have fun being negative."
NorthLake- Seriously, try dawgman. You will enjoy it there. -
NorthLake LOVES Dawgman like he BLEEDS purple and misses WASHINGTON, dammit.RoadDawg55 said:I went back through the thread to see NorthLake's points. It was all doog shit we have seen a million times before.
"This is a new era for Husky football with the new stadium."
"Just because we have sucked the past few years doesn't mean we will this year."
"I think Sark is the guy because I think he's the guy. You guys have fun being negative."
NorthLake- Seriously, try dawgman. You will enjoy it there.
-
I'm confused, you like the articles on this site and said Sark should be fired if he doesn't get 9 wins? Seems in-line with the vast majority here. Toughen up and next time use twat instead of cunt.
-
BRENTS? True?NorthLakeDub said:
Okay you are right, I overstated it when I said we started out good. It truly was a sickening game to watch.RoadDawg55 said:
Yeah, we sure played them great. It was 21-0 after the first fucking quarter you rotten, yeast infected cunt!NorthLakeDub said:
We were playing them pretty good in the Eugene last year until the stupid mistakes killed us and they ran away with it. If we play a smart, physical game we can beat them this year.RoadDawg55 said:
You were doing pretty well until the "even beating the Yucks (LOL), finally!NorthLakeDub said:
And if we don't get to at least 9-4 in 2013 then its time to make some changes. But like I said before, I think we'll get 10 wins. We will win out at home this year, yes even beating the Ducks, finally!ACSlaterDawg said:
7-6>7-6>7-6. Hope THAT helps.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I watch the games. That's all I need to see to know that Sark is not even close to building a winning team.NorthLakeDub said:
And after having a 12-1 season as BYU QB, and being a protege under Pete Carroll at USC, Sark knows absolutely nothing about how a winning team is built. He has never seen what a winning team looks like, has he?Steve_Bowman said:Nothing will change.
As a bench warmer in the SEC, I played very little, but I did see how winning teams are built. Cream Puff is not even close.Southerndawg said:Lack of preparedness, direction, attitude, toughness, player development and accountability. These are coaching problems. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see things changing until a new head coach takes over.
So I guess you must have some kind of privileged insider's perspective of the UW program and you see the daily ins and outs of the program that leads you to the conclusion that nothing will change and Sark is not even close to building a winning team?
HTH
Oh, we got an interception on Oregon's first drive. We played them so tough! We had them right where we wanted them!
But cool it with the name calling you fucking internet board coward. I guarantee you would not call me that to my face, and if you did I would put you fucking face into the pavement. -
Jim Harbaugh. Recent and very relevant example.NorthLakeDub said:
I am not on Dawgman. I don't pay for any internet subscriptions, including the Seattle Times.RoadDawg55 said:NorthLakeDub, what is your name on dawgman? Yeah, Nick Saban had a mediocre record after four years and Frank Beamer was terrible in his first few years at Virginia Tech, but those are exceptions to the norm. Do you realize that?
Honestly, no I did not realize that Saban is the exception to the norm. I also see that DJ was 6-5, 5-6, before 10-2 and winning the RB, and then went 7-4 again.
Please give me examples of coaches who took over a program from the depths of where UW was and won a conference title within 4 years. I am not asking that to be a smart ass either, I truly would like to know, to have something to compare our situation with.
And also, basically every situation is unique and different when a coaching hire is made, so I am not too overly concerned with "the norm".
2006: Pre-Harbaugh 1-11
2007: Harbaugh 4-8
2008: 5-7
2009: 8-5
2010: 12-1
In 4 years he took over a program that had far less talent than even us on our 0'fer year and had them winning a BCS bowl game and going 12-1. With the talent we have on hand, a Saban or Harbaugh type would have us at 9-10 wins next year, and competing for BCS bowls in year 2 imho. -
This shit just got real. Only way to settle this is at the Aurora 7-11.NorthLakeDub said:
I bet you fuck your ugly wife's fat cunt about once every 6 months, the rest of the time you need viagra and internet porn to get off you fucking pathetic loser.RaceBannon said:NorthLakeDub is sure a cunt
-
Haha yeah, anyone who want a piece of me, be there at 10pm tonight! I'll be wearing the Dawgman t-shirt and ball cap!Swaye said:
This shit just got real. Only way to settle this is at the Aurora 7-11.NorthLakeDub said:
I bet you fuck your ugly wife's fat cunt about once every 6 months, the rest of the time you need viagra and internet porn to get off you fucking pathetic loser.RaceBannon said:NorthLakeDub is sure a cunt
-
CuntNorthLakeDub said:
Haha yeah, anyone who want a piece of me, be there at 10pm tonight! I'll be wearing the Dawgman t-shirt and ball cap!Swaye said:
This shit just got real. Only way to settle this is at the Aurora 7-11.NorthLakeDub said:
I bet you fuck your ugly wife's fat cunt about once every 6 months, the rest of the time you need viagra and internet porn to get off you fucking pathetic loser.RaceBannon said:NorthLakeDub is sure a cunt
-
NorthLake did come up with one quote I had never heard before, even from the doogest of doogs.
"Not even Nick Saban could win the Pac 12 with the track around the field!"
We would be coming off back to back 10+ win seasons if Saban was our coach. Who knows if we would have won the Pac 12, but we would be right at the top instead of stuck in the middle. I guarantee our OL and DL would not still be a mess. I doubt all the top in state recruits would go elsewhere. What the fuck does the track have to do with soft, sloppy play with shitty playcalling and poor player development?
-
That's when I knew he was fucking with the board.RoadDawg55 said:NorthLake did come up with one quote I had never heard before, even from the doogest of doogs.
"Not even Nick Saban could win the Pac 12 with the track around the field!"
We would be coming off back to back 10+ win seasons if Saban was our coach. Who knows if we would have won the Pac 12, but we would be right at the top instead of stuck in the middle. I guarantee our OL and DL would not still be a mess. I doubt all the top in state recruits would go elsewhere. What the fuck does the track have to do with soft, sloppy play with shitty playcalling and poor player development?
-
I do like the articles on here because I enjoy hearing a different perspective. And seriously, I have never been on Dawgman in my life. I do check out the commit list on Scout and I have heard their radio program on KJR several times, which was okay I guess, but I like listening to or reading anything having to do with Husky Football, so take that with a grain of salt I guess. But no, I will not pay for a subscription when there is plenty of free content out there.ACSlaterDawg said:I'm confused, you like the articles on this site and said Sark should be fired if he doesn't get 9 wins? Seems in-line with the vast majority here. Toughen up and next time use twat instead of cunt.
And my expectations of having a championship level college football team are in line with the vast majority here. Where we differ is our belief in Sark being the right coach to get us there.
And to everyone saying I need to "toughen up" and stop "being a vag". Go fuck yourselves. I don't get butt hurt, I can take a joke. But I am not going to be insulted by some guy I don't even know and take it without responding with profanity. You guys sound like a clique of fucking high school girls the way you are reacting "if you don't like it here then go hang out with Kim on Dawgman"! Give me a fucking break. -
How does one who's "never been to Dawgman" find himself in this dark corner of the interweb?
-
Must have been a regular in The Pit! Clearly.HillsboroDuck said:How does one who's "never been to Dawgman" find himself in this dark corner of the interweb?
-
Good Q. Wish jismdogs was here to ask CF or SE that Q?HillsboroDuck said:How does one who's "never been to Dawgman" find himself in this dark corner of the interweb?
-
Hi Harv!!CheersWestDawg said:
Good Q. Wish jismdogs was here to ask CF or SE that Q?HillsboroDuck said:How does one who's "never been to Dawgman" find himself in this dark corner of the interweb?
-
Disagree that you "can take a joke". Plenty of evidence so far that you clearly cannot. The above post is a great example of a someone who has sand in their vag.NorthLakeDub said:
I do like the articles on here because I enjoy hearing a different perspective. And seriously, I have never been on Dawgman in my life. I do check out the commit list on Scout and I have heard their radio program on KJR several times, which was okay I guess, but I like listening to or reading anything having to do with Husky Football, so take that with a grain of salt I guess. But no, I will not pay for a subscription when there is plenty of free content out there.ACSlaterDawg said:I'm confused, you like the articles on this site and said Sark should be fired if he doesn't get 9 wins? Seems in-line with the vast majority here. Toughen up and next time use twat instead of cunt.
And my expectations of having a championship level college football team are in line with the vast majority here. Where we differ is our belief in Sark being the right coach to get us there.
And to everyone saying I need to "toughen up" and stop "being a vag". Go fuck yourselves. I don't get butt hurt, I can take a joke. But I am not going to be insulted by some guy I don't even know and take it without responding with profanity. You guys sound like a clique of fucking high school girls the way you are reacting "if you don't like it here then go hang out with Kim on Dawgman"! Give me a fucking break.
-
WTFITP?Swaye said:
Must have been a regular in The Pit! Clearly.HillsboroDuck said:How does one who's "never been to Dawgman" find himself in this dark corner of the interweb?
FTPM
-
We don't "sound like" a clique of high school girls, we are a clique of high school girls. HTH.NorthLakeDub said:
I do like the articles on here because I enjoy hearing a different perspective. And seriously, I have never been on Dawgman in my life. I do check out the commit list on Scout and I have heard their radio program on KJR several times, which was okay I guess, but I like listening to or reading anything having to do with Husky Football, so take that with a grain of salt I guess. But no, I will not pay for a subscription when there is plenty of free content out there.ACSlaterDawg said:I'm confused, you like the articles on this site and said Sark should be fired if he doesn't get 9 wins? Seems in-line with the vast majority here. Toughen up and next time use twat instead of cunt.
And my expectations of having a championship level college football team are in line with the vast majority here. Where we differ is our belief in Sark being the right coach to get us there.
And to everyone saying I need to "toughen up" and stop "being a vag". Go fuck yourselves. I don't get butt hurt, I can take a joke. But I am not going to be insulted by some guy I don't even know and take it without responding with profanity. You guys sound like a clique of fucking high school girls the way you are reacting "if you don't like it here then go hang out with Kim on Dawgman"! Give me a fucking break. -
You left off the last part of my quote. I said with a track around the field, and a decade of miserable losing seasons. So basically I am saying that with the state the program was in, including the shitty facilities, not even Saban could win the Pac12 within 4 years. He wouldn't even be stupid enough to risk his coaching reputation by taking the job. Which is why I am impressed by a rookie head coach who has brought it back to respectability and created a buzz and an interest among big time recruits again.RoadDawg55 said:NorthLake did come up with one quote I had never heard before, even from the doogest of doogs.
"Not even Nick Saban could win the Pac 12 with the track around the field!"
We would be coming off back to back 10+ win seasons if Saban was our coach. Who knows if we would have won the Pac 12, but we would be right at the top instead of stuck in the middle. I guarantee our OL and DL would not still be a mess. I doubt all the top in state recruits would go elsewhere. What the fuck does the track have to do with soft, sloppy play with shitty playcalling and poor player development?
Let's be serious here. You really think that facilities don't matter? Yes, they do. The track completely killed the atmosphere in the stadium, it was ugly and embarrassing. Recruits like things like a shiny new stadium on a lake, yes they really do.
In a previous post you also said:
"I agree that UW was not a great job when Sark took over, but it also was not that bad. 0-12 was a mirage, the team had plenty of talent. Look at the talent on the 2009 team. Jake Locker (1st round), Donald Butler (3rd round), Mason Foster (3rd Round), Daniel Teo' Nesheim (3rd round), Alameda Ta'Amu (4th round), Senio Kelemete (4th Round), Desmond Trufant (first round), Chris Polk (NFL RB, one of the best RB's in school history), Jermaine Kearse (NFL player, productive college WR), Devin Aguillar (Productive WR). Sure we had some holes, but if we are honest, we can admit that is nowehere near cellar dweller talent."
How is that poor player development? None of those guys were guaranteed NFL players. And yes we had some decent talent at the starting positions, but winning consistently is about overall team depth, which we had none. Now we have depth at many positions.
-
Yes, I can take a joke. Sorry but I don't see the humor in some guy I don't even know calling me a smelly yeast infected cunt. That kind of thing gets your jaw broken in real life.MikeDamone said:
Disagree that you "can take a joke". Plenty of evidence so far that you clearly cannot. The above post is a great example of a someone who has sand in their vag.NorthLakeDub said:
I do like the articles on here because I enjoy hearing a different perspective. And seriously, I have never been on Dawgman in my life. I do check out the commit list on Scout and I have heard their radio program on KJR several times, which was okay I guess, but I like listening to or reading anything having to do with Husky Football, so take that with a grain of salt I guess. But no, I will not pay for a subscription when there is plenty of free content out there.ACSlaterDawg said:I'm confused, you like the articles on this site and said Sark should be fired if he doesn't get 9 wins? Seems in-line with the vast majority here. Toughen up and next time use twat instead of cunt.
And my expectations of having a championship level college football team are in line with the vast majority here. Where we differ is our belief in Sark being the right coach to get us there.
And to everyone saying I need to "toughen up" and stop "being a vag". Go fuck yourselves. I don't get butt hurt, I can take a joke. But I am not going to be insulted by some guy I don't even know and take it without responding with profanity. You guys sound like a clique of fucking high school girls the way you are reacting "if you don't like it here then go hang out with Kim on Dawgman"! Give me a fucking break. -
Why would you be offended? You are a smelly yeast infected cunt.NorthLakeDub said:
Yes, I can take a joke. Sorry but I don't see the humor in some guy I don't even know calling me a smelly yeast infected cunt. That kind of thing gets your jaw broken in real life.MikeDamone said:
Disagree that you "can take a joke". Plenty of evidence so far that you clearly cannot. The above post is a great example of a someone who has sand in their vag.NorthLakeDub said:
I do like the articles on here because I enjoy hearing a different perspective. And seriously, I have never been on Dawgman in my life. I do check out the commit list on Scout and I have heard their radio program on KJR several times, which was okay I guess, but I like listening to or reading anything having to do with Husky Football, so take that with a grain of salt I guess. But no, I will not pay for a subscription when there is plenty of free content out there.ACSlaterDawg said:I'm confused, you like the articles on this site and said Sark should be fired if he doesn't get 9 wins? Seems in-line with the vast majority here. Toughen up and next time use twat instead of cunt.
And my expectations of having a championship level college football team are in line with the vast majority here. Where we differ is our belief in Sark being the right coach to get us there.
And to everyone saying I need to "toughen up" and stop "being a vag". Go fuck yourselves. I don't get butt hurt, I can take a joke. But I am not going to be insulted by some guy I don't even know and take it without responding with profanity. You guys sound like a clique of fucking high school girls the way you are reacting "if you don't like it here then go hang out with Kim on Dawgman"! Give me a fucking break.
-
What killed the atmosphere in the stadium was the losing and terrible coaches, not the track.
Sark hasn't done jack shit since 2009-2010. Its a square root recovery...no progress in 3 years. And the offense has fucking sucked, been disjointed and inconsistent since he's been here. He got spirits up and raised expectations right away but since then he's flat-lined.
What does 5-7-7-7 tell you? There hasn't been improvement since he's gotten his own recruits here.
The only progress is the much better defensive staff also responsible for the improved recruiting. Everything has been changed except the head coach.
Recruits will like the stadium but they don't want to play for a 7 win team regardless of if its in the new or old husky stadium. They'd rather play for a championship team in a dump. Oregon's recruiting classes (go to scout and look) didn't reach a new level until after 2009-2010.
-
ACSlaterDawg basically nailed it. Yes, of course facilities matter. The atmosphere was destroyed because of losing, not because of the track. Even with the shitty facilities, our recruiting has been pretty good. We have had a top 25 class 4 out the last 5 years yet we still are average. Sark has done a pretty good job upgrading the talent besides the OL and DL (I'm downplaying the fact that these are the most important position groups along with QB.) I would love to see what a good coach could do with our talent because Sark looks to be an average (at best) coach at this point. We have been underachieving under him and this year is going to be nothing special either. I don't give a shit how cool a guy Sark is or how media savvy he is, the product he is putting on the field is marginal.NorthLakeDub said:
You left off the last part of my quote. I said with a track around the field, and a decade of miserable losing seasons. So basically I am saying that with the state the program was in, including the shitty facilities, not even Saban could win the Pac12 within 4 years. He wouldn't even be stupid enough to risk his coaching reputation by taking the job. Which is why I am impressed by a rookie head coach who has brought it back to respectability and created a buzz and an interest among big time recruits again.RoadDawg55 said:NorthLake did come up with one quote I had never heard before, even from the doogest of doogs.
"Not even Nick Saban could win the Pac 12 with the track around the field!"
We would be coming off back to back 10+ win seasons if Saban was our coach. Who knows if we would have won the Pac 12, but we would be right at the top instead of stuck in the middle. I guarantee our OL and DL would not still be a mess. I doubt all the top in state recruits would go elsewhere. What the fuck does the track have to do with soft, sloppy play with shitty playcalling and poor player development?
Let's be serious here. You really think that facilities don't matter? Yes, they do. The track completely killed the atmosphere in the stadium, it was ugly and embarrassing. Recruits like things like a shiny new stadium on a lake, yes they really do.
In a previous post you also said:
"I agree that UW was not a great job when Sark took over, but it also was not that bad. 0-12 was a mirage, the team had plenty of talent. Look at the talent on the 2009 team. Jake Locker (1st round), Donald Butler (3rd round), Mason Foster (3rd Round), Daniel Teo' Nesheim (3rd round), Alameda Ta'Amu (4th round), Senio Kelemete (4th Round), Desmond Trufant (first round), Chris Polk (NFL RB, one of the best RB's in school history), Jermaine Kearse (NFL player, productive college WR), Devin Aguillar (Productive WR). Sure we had some holes, but if we are honest, we can admit that is nowehere near cellar dweller talent."
How is that poor player development? None of those guys were guaranteed NFL players. And yes we had some decent talent at the starting positions, but winning consistently is about overall team depth, which we had none. Now we have depth at many positions.
Have you seen Sark teams on the road? His record is terrible, and I don't see that changing. I would love for it to happen, but I will believe it when I see it. You see us beating Stanford, ASU, UCLA, and Oregon State on the road? We are really going to beat Oregon? Vegas has us in underdogs in five games and that sounds about right to me. We will probably win one that we shouldn't, but we will also probably blow one we should win. Is 7-5 a special season to you? Is getting blown out two or three times per season acceptable to you (we will again this year)? Shouldn't pre season expectations be higher going into year?
When it comes to player development, I'm going to steal a quote from Mike Damone. Look at the overall picture. Sure, there have been some successes in player development. The failures are just as glaring, see: current OL, DL, WR, Keith Price. It's been average at best. Average is not gonna cut it, especially if we want to get where all of us want us to be.
-
Had to bump thisNorthLakeDub said:This is what I am trying to say. Sark is the one. He is the next Dawgfather. He is a great leader and he knows what he is doing. That is my opinion. If I am wrong and we only win 8 games next year, then I will say fire him. I say we will win 10 games next year. After that, the next great Husky QB will be Troy Williams, he will take us to Rose Bowls and a NC.
I just don't get where you're getting this, seeing examples of this etc.
There have been way too many lapses and breakdowns in discipline, not to mention some of the pourous defense.
Is it possible he can become a decent coach given time? Maybe, I'd put him as probably the 8th or 9th best coach in the Pac 12 right now, and that's being kind because there are some unproven guys. He hasn't shown anything resembling DJ. I watch old games from the 80s and early 90s (because I have no life) and those teams were solid and disciplined. The coaching schemes were also solid. There wasn't confusion about assignments. There was some celebrating, but only when the games were already beyond reach.
When they got destroyed by Bammer in the SUn Bowl, he recruited better speed. When the defense got sliced in 1989, they changed it within the season. Did Holt do that? Hell no. Even during that mediocre stretch in the late 80s, DJ's teams were 21-13-1. What is Sark? 26-25? Even with these pussy schedules, I doubt he can do any better than DJ's down period over the next three years, and sadly, unless he has some losing seasons, he probably won't get canned.
-
I didn't remember Pup being a Sarkbot
-
Such fag, pup.
