Here's a big question, can a black coach do a better job of making the slow strategy approach appeal to black kids? Obviously Bonerpopper and Lake do the best job of bringing in black kids on the staff, but they also recruit the blackest positions. Are they getting black kids because they're black, or because that's the position they recruit? I'm guessing with Lake it's A and Keif it's B. Would a black coach on the DL or LB do a better job getting Fast Strategy kids to buy into Slow Strategy life? Obviously it would have to be the right black coach, but it seems likely the answer is yes.The next question is how well do poly coaches sell fast strategy to black kids since we have two on our staff and another poised to be promoted?Final thought - how the fuck did Huff pull Curne from Texas??? That might have been the recruiting job of the year. I think curne comes from a fairly nice middle class black family that understand what Pete is selling. If curne was from the hood, then a different story. @Tequilla is the high school curne went to in the hood? Pretty sure Curne goes to a private school
Here's a big question, can a black coach do a better job of making the slow strategy approach appeal to black kids? Obviously Bonerpopper and Lake do the best job of bringing in black kids on the staff, but they also recruit the blackest positions. Are they getting black kids because they're black, or because that's the position they recruit? I'm guessing with Lake it's A and Keif it's B. Would a black coach on the DL or LB do a better job getting Fast Strategy kids to buy into Slow Strategy life? Obviously it would have to be the right black coach, but it seems likely the answer is yes.The next question is how well do poly coaches sell fast strategy to black kids since we have two on our staff and another poised to be promoted?Final thought - how the fuck did Huff pull Curne from Texas??? That might have been the recruiting job of the year. I think curne comes from a fairly nice middle class black family that understand what Pete is selling. If curne was from the hood, then a different story. @Tequilla is the high school curne went to in the hood?
Here's a big question, can a black coach do a better job of making the slow strategy approach appeal to black kids? Obviously Bonerpopper and Lake do the best job of bringing in black kids on the staff, but they also recruit the blackest positions. Are they getting black kids because they're black, or because that's the position they recruit? I'm guessing with Lake it's A and Keif it's B. Would a black coach on the DL or LB do a better job getting Fast Strategy kids to buy into Slow Strategy life? Obviously it would have to be the right black coach, but it seems likely the answer is yes.The next question is how well do poly coaches sell fast strategy to black kids since we have two on our staff and another poised to be promoted?Final thought - how the fuck did Huff pull Curne from Texas??? That might have been the recruiting job of the year.
My perception from reading this thread is that I'm the only non-white dude on this board. Why do you hate @Swaye @RoadDawg55 and @BrickSquad??? @Mad-Son is a jewSo we got red, yellow, black and Jew.#rainbow
My perception from reading this thread is that I'm the only non-white dude on this board. Why do you hate @Swaye @RoadDawg55 and @BrickSquad???
My perception from reading this thread is that I'm the only non-white dude on this board.
Remembering my conversations with Metrics Superiority guy about the demographic issue and it’s actually the Big Ten who is going to be the most fucked as black migration has reversed and has started to go back towards the south from the Midwest. And the rich (SEC) will continue to get richer.
Remembering my conversations with Metrics Superiority guy about the demographic issue and it’s actually the Big Ten who is going to be the most fucked as black migration has reversed and has started to go back towards the south from the Midwest. And the rich (SEC) will continue to get richer. That is one of the reasons why Delaney's main goal in expansion was his footprint. He didn't give a shit about Maryland or Rutgers as universities or athletic programs but they brought tv markets and black people.I've been predicting the downfall of the Big Ten for 20 years but they've maintained the status quo and maybe even gotten better at the top. Wisconsin went full whitey that has worked well for them.
There’s a lot of implications to this and UW ... a lot of good whiskey could be consumed while discussing ...Long story short though the positions where we struggle to recruit the most are at positions where you are most likely to be looking at “fast” type of individuals
It's great, I forgot that this board has a token black, a token native, a token asian. I can see how I fit in as a token latino. It's like I was born to do this. Now we just need a poly man so we can be a truly multiethnical board. That used to be @OscarZetaAcosta and then @topdawgnc but I think ICE got them both.What I'm saying is what your seis amigo. Fucking Trump and his fucking war on Messico.Been having to lay low ....
It's great, I forgot that this board has a token black, a token native, a token asian. I can see how I fit in as a token latino. It's like I was born to do this. Now we just need a poly man so we can be a truly multiethnical board. That used to be @OscarZetaAcosta and then @topdawgnc but I think ICE got them both.What I'm saying is what your seis amigo.
It's great, I forgot that this board has a token black, a token native, a token asian. I can see how I fit in as a token latino. It's like I was born to do this. Now we just need a poly man so we can be a truly multiethnical board.
I can make some more points about this at a later date, but just think of it like this... you think a Natty winning team would ever have a picture taken that looks like this?
There’s a lot of implications to this and UW ... a lot of good whiskey could be consumed while discussing ...Long story short though the positions where we struggle to recruit the most are at positions where you are most likely to be looking at “fast” type of individuals Even Alabama's punter is fast. Probably keeps brass knuckles in his locker.
I thought some people on this board were racist. Until I read this thread.
I thought some people on this board were racist. Until I read this thread. some? we all hate white people
@Dennis_DeYoung you forgot the Zulus in Soufffff Africa. Those guys tear shit up. In sports? I don't follow soccer, so they well could... there are a lot of theories about why West Africans seem to be so dominant in sport, but a) it doesn't seem equally distributed across all Africa and b) there's not really a good handle on it right now, partially because it's so controversial of a topic.
@Dennis_DeYoung you forgot the Zulus in Soufffff Africa. Those guys tear shit up.
@Dennis_DeYoung you forgot the Zulus in Soufffff Africa. Those guys tear shit up. In sports? I don't follow soccer, so they well could... there are a lot of theories about why West Africans seem to be so dominant in sport, but a) it doesn't seem equally distributed across all Africa and b) there's not really a good handle on it right now, partially because it's so controversial of a topic. Having read Soccernomics I can actually weigh in on this. South Africa (the country) is a very interestic example because of Apartheid. Obviously it caused the socioeconomic divide to split exactly based on racial differences. Even to this day, rich, middle class and poor are basically the exact same groops as white, mix-raced, and black.In South Africa, whites dominate rugby, whereas mixed-raced dominate soccer. Rugby is basically the rich people sport for cultural reasons. Soccer is the most popular sport, but is still dominated by mixed-race players, even though it's a smaller portion of the population than white people.For the record, the population breakdown (according to wikipedia) is this: Black 67%, White 21%, Mixed 9%. So why have mixed-race players dominated South Africa's most popular sport since the fall of Apartheid? The answer is really simple: They're in the sweet spot.Black people in South Africa often live in abject poverty. They often don't have access to enough food or medicine to develop physically, nor do they have the free time to pursue sports even if they did, in a lot of cases. Plus, y'know, AIDS.White people on the other hand, live a lot more comfortably. The will have a nice life even if they don't succeed in sports. The few that decide to pursue sports anyway usually end up in Rugby or Cricket. Or legless running (not really).Mixed-race people are poor enough to pursue sports as a way out, but not so poor that they don't have food and medicine to physically develop. Pretty much the same as urban black kids in America. That's why they succeed in sports at a very disproportionate rate.This is obviously very simplified, but it's the essence of it.
@Dennis_DeYoung you forgot the Zulus in Soufffff Africa. Those guys tear shit up. In sports? I don't follow soccer, so they well could... there are a lot of theories about why West Africans seem to be so dominant in sport, but a) it doesn't seem equally distributed across all Africa and b) there's not really a good handle on it right now, partially because it's so controversial of a topic. Having read Soccernomics I can actually weigh in on this. South Africa (the country) is a very interestic example because of Apartheid. Obviously it caused the socioeconomic divide to split exactly based on racial differences. Even to this day, rich, middle class and poor are basically the exact same groops as white, mix-raced, and black.In South Africa, whites dominate rugby, whereas mixed-raced dominate soccer. Rugby is basically the rich people sport for cultural reasons. Soccer is the most popular sport, but is still dominated by mixed-race players, even though it's a smaller portion of the population than white people.For the record, the population breakdown (according to wikipedia) is this: Black 67%, White 21%, Mixed 9%. So why have mixed-race players dominated South Africa's most popular sport since the fall of Apartheid? The answer is really simple: They're in the sweet spot.Black people in South Africa often live in abject poverty. They often don't have access to enough food or medicine to develop physically, nor do they have the free time to pursue sports even if they did, in a lot of cases. Plus, y'know, AIDS.White people on the other hand, live a lot more comfortably. The will have a nice life even if they don't succeed in sports. The few that decide to pursue sports anyway usually end up in Rugby or Cricket. Or legless running (not really).Mixed-race people are poor enough to pursue sports as a way out, but not so poor that they don't have food and medicine to physically develop. Pretty much the same as urban black kids in America. That's why they succeed in sports at a very disproportionate rate.This is obviously very simplified, but it's the essence of it. Good chit. This is definitely the smartest thread of 2018 ever. I'm learning and shit.
@Dennis_DeYoung you forgot the Zulus in Soufffff Africa. Those guys tear shit up. In sports? I don't follow soccer, so they well could... there are a lot of theories about why West Africans seem to be so dominant in sport, but a) it doesn't seem equally distributed across all Africa and b) there's not really a good handle on it right now, partially because it's so controversial of a topic. Having read Soccernomics I can actually weigh in on this. South Africa (the country) is a very interestic example because of Apartheid. Obviously it caused the socioeconomic divide to split exactly based on racial differences. Even to this day, rich, middle class and poor are basically the exact same groops as white, mix-raced, and black.In South Africa, whites dominate rugby, whereas mixed-raced dominate soccer. Rugby is basically the rich people sport for cultural reasons. Soccer is the most popular sport, but is still dominated by mixed-race players, even though it's a smaller portion of the population than white people.For the record, the population breakdown (according to wikipedia) is this: Black 67%, White 21%, Mixed 9%. So why have mixed-race players dominated South Africa's most popular sport since the fall of Apartheid? The answer is really simple: They're in the sweet spot.Black people in South Africa often live in abject poverty. They often don't have access to enough food or medicine to develop physically, nor do they have the free time to pursue sports even if they did, in a lot of cases. Plus, y'know, AIDS.White people on the other hand, live a lot more comfortably. The will have a nice life even if they don't succeed in sports. The few that decide to pursue sports anyway usually end up in Rugby or Cricket. Or legless running (not really).Mixed-race people are poor enough to pursue sports as a way out, but not so poor that they don't have food and medicine to physically develop. Pretty much the same as urban black kids in America. That's why they succeed in sports at a very disproportionate rate.This is obviously very simplified, but it's the essence of it. Good chit. This is definitely the smartest thread of 2018. I'm learning and shit.
Also, I forgot to add, FUCK RUGBY those guys are massive fags.
