Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Just need an insurance policy...

124

Comments

  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    The Republic of California could use talented people like Peter Strzok. When the time comes, hopefully soon, it will be good to know that civil liberties and civil society will be protected in the Golden Country.
    Peter Strzok should be shot by a firing squad like the traitor that he is.
    He will be my Country’s next Attorney General.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited December 2017
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    The Republic of California could use talented people like Peter Strzok. When the time comes, hopefully soon, it will be good to know that civil liberties and civil society will be protected in the Golden Country.
    Peter Strzok should be shot by a firing squad like the traitor that he is.
    He will be my Country’s next Attorney General.
    Move to Canada and take him with you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    The Republic of California could use talented people like Peter Strzok. When the time comes, hopefully soon, it will be good to know that civil liberties and civil society will be protected in the Golden Country.
    Peter Strzok should be shot by a firing squad like the traitor that he is.
    He will be my Country’s next Attorney General.
    Move to Canada and take him with you.
    I am a Californian.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,541 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    The Republic of California could use talented people like Peter Strzok. When the time comes, hopefully soon, it will be good to know that civil liberties and civil society will be protected in the Golden Country.
    Peter Strzok should be shot by a firing squad like the traitor that he is.
    He will be my Country’s next Attorney General.
    Move to Canada and take him with you.
    I am a Californian.
    We don't need idiots like Zotar here
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    It doesn't just look bad, it is bad, plain and simple. This is the same guy who toned down the language used to describe Hillary Clinton's actions with her private email server. He's a partisan hack who has used his position to serve his political leanings.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    edited December 2017
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    creepycoug said:

    Derek, Jesus man.

    Run and cry to Derek like a pussy. It's what you are.
    You're acting pretty tuff today. I'm impressed.

    PS: About the board function dummy. You react like a dog. Nobody needs help with a faggot like you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    The Republic of California could use talented people like Peter Strzok. When the time comes, hopefully soon, it will be good to know that civil liberties and civil society will be protected in the Golden Country.
    California civil? The place is a small islands of decent places to live in a sea of shit. And you get to pay for all the shit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    AZDuck said:

    I'm on team LIFPO

    No you're not.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    The Republic of California could use talented people like Peter Strzok. When the time comes, hopefully soon, it will be good to know that civil liberties and civil society will be protected in the Golden Country.
    Peter Strzok should be shot by a firing squad like the traitor that he is.
    He will be my Country’s next Attorney General.
    Move to Canada and take him with you.
    I am a Californian.
    crackle.gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    AZDuck said:

    This is going to sound crazy, but people who investigate the Mafia are allowed to dislike the Mafia. I also like how Muller pulled these folks off the case a long time back, before the media got involved.

    If there's any evidence that the investigations have been tainted by bias or influence, that will be an issue for the courts.

    I'm seeing an investigation that has racked up a couple of indictments and two convictions, which is better than Ken Starr's fishing expedition was able to do in the 1990's, and the Klinton Krime Konspiracy was killing people (and allegedly still are #neverforgetseth)

    It isn't a matter of disliking Trump. If they had just called Trump an idiot that is one thing. But suggesting you are going to protect the country from Trump being president, having an insurance policy in case he is, certainly looks bad and you would have to be a partisan not to see that (just as the Trump team meeting Russians looks bad or the Flynn lying to the FBI looks bad). This does not mean they were biased in what facts they discovered. But when another investigator's wife was working for Fusion GPS and the head of Fusion GPS said that investigator had called him in to talk about the Russian investigation, then it is not a good look for the DOJ and FBI.
    The Republic of California could use talented people like Peter Strzok. When the time comes, hopefully soon, it will be good to know that civil liberties and civil society will be protected in the Golden Country.
    The Golden Country first act would be to deport the dead weight.



    Mexico will take you though. There will be quite a bit of ditch digging to be done next year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter