Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Commitments and Visits in the Petersen Era (2014-2017 data)

2

Comments

  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    DodgyBloke said:

    When does your shit recruiting website launch?

    As soon as Coker drinks a beer, never.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    Your stats don't mean what you think they mean.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    FremontTroll said:

    Your stats don't mean what you think they mean.

    Well duh it's not detailed enough. Kids take random visits just because, some schools just bring in a shit ton of kids, different visit strategies etc. I just thought it was chintresting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298

    Can you group the data by stars?

    Also, don't do powerpoint. Microsoft products suck.

    Can you do it in R?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    FremontTroll said:

    backthepack said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Your stats don't mean what you think they mean.

    Well duh it's not detailed enough. Kids take random visits just because, some schools just bring in a shit ton of kids, different visit strategies etc. I just thought it was chintresting.
    Naw, my point is that we close such a high percentage because we bring in so few. For the most part kids that are already committed or have very high interest.

    If we brought in as many kids as the other schools you listed our percentage would drop to a similar number.
    I agree. Bama has a lower percentage of kids that visit and commit but that’s just because it’s all 5 Star kids who want to trip to Bama not because Bama is worse at selling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    Edwin_Bambino said:

    FremontTroll said:

    backthepack said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Your stats don't mean what you think they mean.

    Well duh it's not detailed enough. Kids take random visits just because, some schools just bring in a shit ton of kids, different visit strategies etc. I just thought it was chintresting.
    Naw, my point is that we close such a high percentage because we bring in so few. For the most part kids that are already committed or have very high interest.

    If we brought in as many kids as the other schools you listed our percentage would drop to a similar number.
    I agree. Bama has a lower percentage of kids that visit and commit but that’s just because it’s all 5 Star kids who want to trip to Bama not because Bama is worse at selling.
    I bet a lot of them go "Wow Mr. Saban is a dick"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    those other schols bring in a shit ton of guys and only truly offer a few of tehm, so the data doesn't work as well as you'd hope.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    PurpleBaze said:

    backthepack said:

    Should I create a group to compare it to (Bama, USC, OSU, Clemson, and Oklahoma)?

    Sure... & create a PowerPoint presentation.
    I approve but only if there's a chart included. @Dardanus might have some ideas.
    uzi said:


    Can you group the data by stars?

    Also, don't do powerpoint. Microsoft products suck.

    Can you do it in R?

    I'll break it down by stars.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter