Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is inconvenient

2»

Comments

  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    dflea said:

    "This one time..."
    "This one country..."
    "My gun could totally beat up your knife."

    Is that the best you guys got?

    It's better than what you got.

    Take your knife to a gun range and whip it out and confront someone. How long before you're dead? I'm guessing 30 seconds, tops. And that's assuming everyone clowns you for bringing your knife to a gun fight before they air you out.

    But that has nothing to do with whether or not banning guns will have a significant impact on overall murders.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited November 2017
    dflea said:

    "This one time..."
    "This one country..."
    "My gun could totally beat up your knife."

    Is that the best you guys got?

    It's better than what you got.

    Take your knife to a gun range and whip it out and confront someone. How long before you're dead? I'm guessing 30 seconds, tops. And that's assuming everyone clowns you for bringing your knife to a gun fight before they air you out.

    Only your dumb ass would be stupid enough to challenge someone at a gun range with any type of weapon. It's clear you have no idea what your talking about. You just want to chime in for your team, Hondo style.

    Stick to what you know.... Mom jokes and being a transparent, closeted homo.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:

    "This one time..."
    "This one country..."
    "My gun could totally beat up your knife."

    Is that the best you guys got?

    It's better than what you got.

    Take your knife to a gun range and whip it out and confront someone. How long before you're dead? I'm guessing 30 seconds, tops. And that's assuming everyone clowns you for bringing your knife to a gun fight before they air you out.

    Only your dumb ass would be stupid enough to challenge someone at a gun range with any type of weapon. It's clear you have no idea what your talking about. You just want to chime in for your team, Hondo style.

    Stick to what you know.... Mom jokes and being a transparent, closeted homo.
    You stick with what you know.

    Sucking cock and being a fucking retard.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    AZDuck said:

    ANFO bombs have to be pretty big to get decent bang + overpressure and require potent accelerant like TNT.

    Pipe bombs gonna pipe bomb, but black powder is lousy primary ingredient for explosive and blast wave dissipates really quickly.

    Decent bombs aren't easy to make, unless the Iranians are shipping Semtex to you by the ton, or you have thousands of 155 rounds lying around unattended.

    You're welcome BTW,I just got this whole bored followed by @NSA_Dawg

    It has nothing to do with blast radius and everything to do with fragmentation. A 9lb warhead doesn't sink a fighter jet, it's the hundreds of continuos rods that shoot out from it that does.

    Blowing up hardened structures is hard. Taking out fleshlings isn't. It's hard.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Mosster47 said:

    AZDuck said:

    ANFO bombs have to be pretty big to get decent bang + overpressure and require potent accelerant like TNT.

    Pipe bombs gonna pipe bomb, but black powder is lousy primary ingredient for explosive and blast wave dissipates really quickly.

    Decent bombs aren't easy to make, unless the Iranians are shipping Semtex to you by the ton, or you have thousands of 155 rounds lying around unattended.

    You're welcome BTW,I just got this whole bored followed by @NSA_Dawg

    It has nothing to do with blast radius and everything to do with fragmentation. A 9lb warhead doesn't sink a fighter jet, it's the hundreds of continuos rods that shoot out from it that does.

    Blowing up hardened structures is hard. Taking out fleshlings isn't. It's hard.
    Sort of.

    If I may, it has more to do with the overpressure that is going to fling the rods or disintegrate the seams in the frag lining that is necessary. Too many pipe bombs don't have enough to even properly shatter the pipe. Also, powder is super volatile, and I wouldn't pack that crap into a pipe even though I kinda sorta know what I'm doing. If you're going to take out more than a couple meters blast radius, you need real bang or a lot of ANFO.

    Look at the Boston Marathon bombings. Two pressure cooker devices loaded with shrapnel. 3 dead, and those went off in the middle of a veritable sardine can of people. Lots of people got hurt by the shrapnel, and some pretty badly. But compared to what Mr. Poker Player did from the Mandalay Bay with his rifles, it wasn't much.

    And holy fuck, those guys built theirs with gunpowder. Surprised they didn't blow their Uzbek or Tajik or whatever faces off. Although I guess the cops rectified that error.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,477 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    It doesnt really matter if a knife can kill 58 people at once or if a knife can defend against a gun. Or is there something about 58 people dying at once in one location that is worse tha n 58 people dying in separate isolated incidents? Last I checked, a life is a life, and there is no solid proof that the overall amount of people who are murdered over time are decreased when guns arent available.

    When we compare the US to other countries, we see that other countries already had a lower murder rate than the US before those countries banned guns, and that they were already trending toward that direction anyway. So there is nothing to conclude.

    Australia says to fuck off.
    Anti-liberty shill heard from.

    #stillhere