UW is a "fraud" according to
No more sark players save for a couple and noodle arm on top of a shit conference and I guess it makes sense?
Comments
-
Dafuq? GIF got killed..... oh well, EVERYONE.gif
-
Overrated this year? Yes - definitely. But fuck this cunt of an author in the face. Empty calories or not, 20-4 is a pretty huge step in the right direction post 2001- 13.
-
It's hard.jecornel said:https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/columnist/dan-wolken/2017/11/12/misery-index-11-georgia-title-hopes-take-hit-exposed-auburn/856612001/
No more sark players save for a couple and noodle arm on top of a shit conference and I guess it makes sense? -
Ouch:jecornel said:https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/columnist/dan-wolken/2017/11/12/misery-index-11-georgia-title-hopes-take-hit-exposed-auburn/856612001/
No more sark players save for a couple and noodle arm on top of a shit conference and I guess it makes sense?
Washington: There’s not much worse feeling as a fan than to have the entire country calling your program a fraud and having very little ammunition to dispute it. But that’s kind of where we are with Washington, as there’s far more evidence during this two-year run to suggest the Huskies have been wildly overrated. Aside from that smashing win last September against Stanford that put them on the map nationally, what have they really done other than beat a bunch of mediocre Pac-12 teams?
There's always the academis smack. Well, at least as applied to WSU, Oregon, Oregon State, Utah and the Zonas. The Cali schoolz aren't having any of that from up north. -
UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like, fairly solid Stanford team with a better game plan.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet. -
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
-
We weren't that overrated last year and the play off spot was merited. We weren't on Bama or Clempson's level, but neither was fucking anyone else (hi Ohio State). 2016 was a YUGE achievement and any sports pundit that want to shit all over that can suck a BFC. Think about is this way: Since you? @creepycoug pushed our shit in in 2001, UW hadn't played an meaningful Nov football game until last year, when we made it to the playoffs. That's pretty dramatic turnaround and it's not a fluke. 23-4 since 2015 ASU - cup cakes or not - ain't something to poo, poo and evidence of the ship being skippered by a competent captain.creepycoug said:
Ouch:jecornel said:https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/columnist/dan-wolken/2017/11/12/misery-index-11-georgia-title-hopes-take-hit-exposed-auburn/856612001/
No more sark players save for a couple and noodle arm on top of a shit conference and I guess it makes sense?
Washington: There’s not much worse feeling as a fan than to have the entire country calling your program a fraud and having very little ammunition to dispute it. But that’s kind of where we are with Washington, as there’s far more evidence during this two-year run to suggest the Huskies have been wildly overrated. Aside from that smashing win last September against Stanford that put them on the map nationally, what have they really done other than beat a bunch of mediocre Pac-12 teams?
Ouch. -
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die. -
We were hoping that jake would take that next step in his development, but he didn't hence we suck. His fundamentals are so shitty, I want to kill babushka.
-
Agree with all that row boat. Good poast.YellowSnow said:
We weren't that overrated last year and the play off spot was merited, if only technically. We weren't on Bama or Clempson's or Ohio State's or USC's or ... level, but neither was fucking anyone elsecreepycoug said:
Ouch:jecornel said:https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/columnist/dan-wolken/2017/11/12/misery-index-11-georgia-title-hopes-take-hit-exposed-auburn/856612001/
No more sark players save for a couple and noodle arm on top of a shit conference and I guess it makes sense?
Washington: There’s not much worse feeling as a fan than to have the entire country calling your program a fraud and having very little ammunition to dispute it. But that’s kind of where we are with Washington, as there’s far more evidence during this two-year run to suggest the Huskies have been wildly overrated. Aside from that smashing win last September against Stanford that put them on the map nationally, what have they really done other than beat a bunch of mediocre Pac-12 teams?
Ouch.(hi Ohio State). 2016 was a YUGE achievement and any sports pundit that want to shit all over that can suck a BFC. Think about is this way: Since you? @creepycoug pushed our shit in in 2001, UW hadn't played an meaningful Nov football game until last year, when we made it to the playoffs, even if only by virtue of playing in the shittiest version of our conference in the last 100 years, a version which featured the Kewgs competing for the north and the Buffs winning the south. That's pretty dramatic turnaround and it's not a fluke, even if it made us look better than we actually were. 23-4 since 2015 ASU - cup cakes or not - ain't something to poo, poo and evidence of the ship being skippered by a competent captain. -
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
Try and think about it this way. Axe yourself how you'd score it if it had been Oregon on the field against the Furd. -
And I want to jump into that avatar of yours.WeakarmCobra said:We were hoping that jake would take that next step in his development, but he didn't hence we suck. His fundamentals are so shitty, I want to kill babushka.
-
Once again, more departure from actual reality. I guess that's what it takes to be you.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
Try and think about it this way. Axe yourself how you'd score it if it had been Oregon on the field against the Furd. -
You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close. -
(.5) ❤️ = (1) ❤️TurdBuffer said:
Once again, more departure from actual reality. I guess that's what it takes to be you.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
Try and think about it this way. Axe yourself how you'd score it if it had been Oregon on the field against the Furd.
Once again, saying "make shit up" and "departure from reality" over and over doesn't make you right or cogent or anything but redundant. You lost to a one-legged man in an ass kicking contest. Get over it and take it like a man. -
The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.YellowSnow said:
You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close. -
Only you would describe a RB who runs 30 times for 166 yards as having a "flat tire." Because only you would have such drizzly shit dripping from your mouth, as usual.creepycoug said:
(.5) ❤️ = (1) ❤️TurdBuffer said:
Once again, more departure from actual reality. I guess that's what it takes to be you.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
Try and think about it this way. Axe yourself how you'd score it if it had been Oregon on the field against the Furd.
Once again, saying "make shit up" and "departure from reality" over and over doesn't make you right or cogent or anything but redundant. You lost to a one-legged man in an ass kicking contest. Get over it and take it like a man. -
Well,Montana is a "quality opponent," just in a lower division....
-
a dreadful pass game led by a terrible QB when he faces anyone decent, a terrible OC, a good running game and a defense that is sound but doesn't make big plays and has yet to prove they can hold up against good passing offenses is what we are until proven otherwise.
Losing to auburn will only add more fuel to that argument -
I was making fun of the script from the announcers and not trying to put lipstick on a pig. The Defense had a bad game on the road against a mediocre team on the road. Funny thing is giving up 30 pts once in the while in the PAC shouldn't be that big of a deal; plenty of great teams have given that up and still won. But it's death sentence when your offense is "differently-abled" and that's the root issue here. UW should have been up 21- 7 at half and been able to win a 35- 30 type game.creepycoug said:
The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.YellowSnow said:
You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close. -
We've heard the argument that this defense, despite losing 3 guys to the draft, was "better" than last year's. I think that's a very relative conclusion, and not true. We are not as good on the back end, nor at LB, IMO, and the Buck position has not produced pressure like we saw with Psalm, even though his pressure was typically misdirected, out-of-whack, and ineffective. The DL has played well, and the LBs seem faster, but not as sure-handed when tackling as last year, and not hitting anyone very hard, compared to the last couple years.YellowSnow said:
I was making fun of the script from the announcers and not trying to put lipstick on a pig. The Defense had a bad game on the road against a mediocre team on the road. Funny thing is giving up 30 pts once in the while in the PAC shouldn't be that big of a deal; plenty of great teams have given that up and still won. But it's death sentence when your offense is "differently-abled" and that's the root issue here. UW should have been up 21- 7 at half and been able to win a 35- 30 type game.creepycoug said:
The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.YellowSnow said:
You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
The low scoring numbers have also been a little deceiving, because we haven't played against as many good QBs as last year. Rosen was gone after 1.5 quarters, Burmeister was a no-show, and Cal's & OSU's QBs were sub-par at best. Great scoring #'s against those anemic offenses does not indicate a D that's "better than last year" IMO.
Stats are for losers. -
You miss the point ass muncher. The results are in the books. Even a shit brain like you can’t revise it now. The only question is whether Love was hurt. Let’s check the facts (not your shit brain opinion, which matters less than the dump I took this morning):TurdBuffer said:
Only you would describe a RB who runs 30 times for 166 yards as having a "flat tire." Because only you would have such drizzly shit dripping from your mouth, as usual.creepycoug said:
(.5) ❤️ = (1) ❤️TurdBuffer said:
Once again, more departure from actual reality. I guess that's what it takes to be you.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
Try and think about it this way. Axe yourself how you'd score it if it had been Oregon on the field against the Furd.
Once again, saying "make shit up" and "departure from reality" over and over doesn't make you right or cogent or anything but redundant. You lost to a one-legged man in an ass kicking contest. Get over it and take it like a man.
1. He injured his ankle weeks ago and was hurt enough to sit out Oregon State.
2. He was Gimpy Gary against the Kewgs and ran for a whopping 69 yards.
3. He either aggravated the ankle against the Doogs or he fake aggravated it against the Doogs. Only the Doogs can be in charge of this theory; it’s just too fucking stupid for anyone else to maintain.
4. If he was faking, he did a good fucking job of it, sitting out on several key drives on which his shit backup couldn’t gain a yard.
5. Despite these facts, Turdeater says Creepycoug is just making shit up.
6. Turdy the Goon just keeps repeating himself but doesn’t ever say exactly what Creepy’s making up.
7. Just to rub Turdy’s fucking nose in it: the Kewgs held him to 69!!! The #1 defense gave up almost two hundy and three scores.
I mean, what in the fuck do you want me to do with this shit narrative of yours Sally?
-
Too bad Turdy the Gimp can't benefit from 1/4th of your IQ. Can't argue with any of that.YellowSnow said:
I was making fun of the script from the announcers and not trying to put lipstick on a pig. The Defense had a bad game on the road against a mediocre team on the road. Funny thing is giving up 30 pts once in the while in the PAC shouldn't be that big of a deal; plenty of great teams have given that up and still won. But it's death sentence when your offense is "differently-abled" and that's the root issue here. UW should have been up 21- 7 at half and been able to win a 35- 30 type game.creepycoug said:
The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.YellowSnow said:
You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close. -
Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.
In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks. -
Welcome to like every fucking year and every fucking team that doesn't go start to finish unbeaten. But even a broken clock is right twice a day.TurdBuffer said:Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.
In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks.
-
The Team isn't a Fraud. Brownsocks is. at one point he had 1:8 hiesman odds.
-
You realize you troll like a child-rapist, don't you?creepycoug said:
Welcome to like every fucking year and every fucking team that doesn't go start to finish unbeaten. But even a broken clock is right twice a day.TurdBuffer said:Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.
In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks.
The "creepy" all makes sense now. -
You guys are an 8 or 9 win team this year at best which is why preseason rankings are dumb.
Last year you got pushed around by Bama and USC. Bama I get, USC not so much. Your D was beyond stacked last year but the O was a liability. This year is a decent defense with the offense still being a liability. Next year both will be a liability.
It was a great one year run. The Seattle Times piece in 12 years will be great.
-
All that being saidTurdBuffer said:
We've heard the argument that this defense, despite losing 3 guys to the draft, was "better" than last year's. I think that's a very relative conclusion, and not true. We are not as good on the back end, nor at LB, IMO, and the Buck position has not produced pressure like we saw with Psalm, even though his pressure was typically misdirected, out-of-whack, and ineffective. The DL has played well, and the LBs seem faster, but not as sure-handed when tackling as last year, and not hitting anyone very hard, compared to the last couple years.YellowSnow said:
I was making fun of the script from the announcers and not trying to put lipstick on a pig. The Defense had a bad game on the road against a mediocre team on the road. Funny thing is giving up 30 pts once in the while in the PAC shouldn't be that big of a deal; plenty of great teams have given that up and still won. But it's death sentence when your offense is "differently-abled" and that's the root issue here. UW should have been up 21- 7 at half and been able to win a 35- 30 type game.creepycoug said:
The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.YellowSnow said:
You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.creepycoug said:
Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!TurdBuffer said:
Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.creepycoug said:
FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.TurdBuffer said:UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like,
fairly solidincredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.
The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.
Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.
Fuck off and die.
But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.
Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
The low scoring numbers have also been a little deceiving, because we haven't played against as many good QBs as last year. Rosen was gone after 1.5 quarters, Burmeister was a no-show, and Cal's & OSU's QBs were sub-par at best. Great scoring #'s against those anemic offenses does not indicate a D that's "better than last year" IMO.
Stats are for losers.Jake Browning Sucksit's still a pretty dang good defense. Whether or not it's better or not than last year or if the stats are skewed by cupcakes is superfluous in my estimation. It's still a D that is easily good enough to win PAC championships. We are fortunate as hell to have an evil genius like Kawasaki; fuck the entire offense though except for RB's, TE's and some of the OL pieces. We need better dudes and better coaching. -
Well, I guess even a full-blown short bus rider can catch up eventually.TurdBuffer said:
You realize you troll like a child-rapist, don't you?creepycoug said:
Welcome to like every fucking year and every fucking team that doesn't go start to finish unbeaten. But even a broken clock is right twice a day.TurdBuffer said:Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.
In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks.
The "creepy" all makes sense now.
Your protestations on Love are still nuclear fucking stoopid, poontless, doogy and nonsensical. And dripping with chunt juice.
Keep getting mad about it Kimmy the Mule. Kristvashon says 'hi'.
