Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

ruh roh

2»

Comments

  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    Big win guys. I always knew you would be back I just had no idea it would happen so soon

    image
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    Who GAF about gubernatorial races other than those that live in those states?









    I guess Loobs do though.




    Take em where you can get em, I guess.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    salemcoog said:

    Who GAF about gubernatorial races other than those that live in those states?









    I guess Loobs do though.




    Take em where you can get em, I guess.

    Sounds like you care.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    edited November 2017
    LebamDawg said:



    If your side worried more about improving the economy and less about screeching like a bunch of faggots over statues and letting men into womens' restrooms, you might actually become relevant again.

    Ironically a trans women beat the republican who sponsored the bathroom bill for his state house seat. Talk about embarrassing for that guy. I get it it's a state legislature seat, doesn't mean anything. But it's still fucking funny.

    They voted for him her because she is able to look at the issues without being chinfluenced by male priviledge - she isn't thinking with her dick anymore

    I can't tell which party you are describing.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    LebamDawg said:



    If your side worried more about improving the economy and less about screeching like a bunch of faggots over statues and letting men into womens' restrooms, you might actually become relevant again.

    Ironically a trans women beat the republican who sponsored the bathroom bill for his state house seat. Talk about embarrassing for that guy. I get it it's a state legislature seat, doesn't mean anything. But it's still fucking funny.

    They voted for him her because she is able to look at the issues without being chinfluenced by male priviledge - she isn't thinking with her dick anymore

    I can't tell which party you are describing.
    I thought the exact same thing.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2017
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    2001400ex said:

    LebamDawg said:



    If your side worried more about improving the economy and less about screeching like a bunch of faggots over statues and letting men into womens' restrooms, you might actually become relevant again.

    Ironically a trans women beat the republican who sponsored the bathroom bill for his state house seat. Talk about embarrassing for that guy. I get it it's a state legislature seat, doesn't mean anything. But it's still fucking funny.

    They voted for him her because she is able to look at the issues without being chinfluenced by male priviledge - she isn't thinking with her dick anymore

    I can't tell which party you are describing.
    I thought the exact same thing.

    First time for everything I suppose.

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    LebamDawg said:



    If your side worried more about improving the economy and less about screeching like a bunch of faggots over statues and letting men into womens' restrooms, you might actually become relevant again.

    Ironically a trans women beat the republican who sponsored the bathroom bill for his state house seat. Talk about embarrassing for that guy. I get it it's a state legislature seat, doesn't mean anything. But it's still fucking funny.

    They voted for him her because she is able to look at the issues without being chinfluenced by male priviledge - she isn't thinking with her dick anymore

    I can't tell which party you are describing.
    you don't get it.
    Only the left can't talk about statues, bathrooms, etc.
    when the right does it it's fine.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dhdawg said:

    LebamDawg said:



    If your side worried more about improving the economy and less about screeching like a bunch of faggots over statues and letting men into womens' restrooms, you might actually become relevant again.

    Ironically a trans women beat the republican who sponsored the bathroom bill for his state house seat. Talk about embarrassing for that guy. I get it it's a state legislature seat, doesn't mean anything. But it's still fucking funny.

    They voted for him her because she is able to look at the issues without being chinfluenced by male priviledge - she isn't thinking with her dick anymore

    I can't tell which party you are describing.
    you don't get it.
    Only the left can't talk about statues, bathrooms, etc.
    when the right does it it's fine.
    Left peddles the statues issue in an attempt to stoke racial division and play identity politics. It was the left who thought it was a good idea to let men start using women's restrooms. HTH
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    LebamDawg said:



    If your side worried more about improving the economy and less about screeching like a bunch of faggots over statues and letting men into womens' restrooms, you might actually become relevant again.

    Ironically a trans women beat the republican who sponsored the bathroom bill for his state house seat. Talk about embarrassing for that guy. I get it it's a state legislature seat, doesn't mean anything. But it's still fucking funny.

    They voted for him her because she is able to look at the issues without being chinfluenced by male priviledge - she isn't thinking with her dick anymore

    I can't tell which party you are describing.
    you don't get it.
    Only the left can't talk about statues, bathrooms, etc.
    when the right does it it's fine.
    Left peddles the statues issue in an attempt to stoke racial division and play identity politics. It was the left who thought it was a good idea to let men start using women's restrooms. HTH
    once again, I cannot tell which party you are referencing